1887
Volume 41, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

The goal of automatic velocity analysis is to extract accurate velocity from voluminous seismic data with efficiency. In this study, we developed an efficient automatic velocity analysis algorithm by using bootstrapped differential semblance (BDS) and Monte Carlo inversion. To estimate more accurate results from automatic velocity analysis, the algorithm we have developed uses BDS, which provides a higher velocity resolution than conventional semblance, as a coherency estimator. In addition, our proposed automatic velocity analysis module is performed with a conditional initial velocity determination step that leads to enhanced efficiency in running time of the module. A new optional root mean square (RMS) velocity constraint, which prevents picking false peaks, is used. The developed automatic velocity analysis module was tested on a synthetic dataset and a marine field dataset from the East Sea, Korea. The stacked sections made using velocity results from our algorithm showed coherent events and improved the quality of the normal moveout-correction result. Moreover, since our algorithm finds interval velocity () first with interval velocity constraints and then calculates a RMS velocity function from the interval velocity, we can estimate geologically reasonable interval velocities. Boundaries of interval velocities also match well with reflection events in the common midpoint stacked sections.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG10004
2010-03-01
2026-01-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abbad B. Ursin B. Rappin D. 2009 Automatic nonhyperbolic velocity analysis: Geophysics 74 U1 U12 doi:10.1190/1.3075144
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brandsberg-Dahl S. Ursin B. De Hoop M. V. 2003 Seismic velocity analysis in the scattering-angle/azimuth domain: Geophysical Prospecting 51 295 314 doi:10.1046/j.1365-2478.2003.00370.x
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Choi H. , Byun J. , and Seol S. J. 2009, Application of automatic velocity analysis using global search method: Proceedings of the 9th SEGJ International Symposium, Sapporo, Japan, 17.
  4. Dix C. H. 1955 Seismic velocity from surface measurements: Geophysics 20 68 89 doi:10.1190/1.1438126
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Falk J. Tessmer E. Gajewski D. 1996 Tube wave modeling by the finite-difference method with varying grid spacing: Pure and Applied Geophysics 148 77 93 doi:10.1007/BF00882055
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lumley D. E. 1997, Monte Carlo automatic velocity picks: Stanford Exploration Project SEP-75, 1–25.
  7. Sacchi M. D. 1998 A bootstrap procedure for high-resolution velocity analysis: Geophysics 63 1716 1725 doi:10.1190/1.1444467
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Symes W. Carazzone J. 1991 Velocity inversion by differential semblance optimisation: Geophysics 56 654 663 doi:10.1190/1.1443082
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Taner M. T. Koehler F. 1969 Velocity spectra-digital computer derivation and applications of velocity function: Geophysics 34 859 881 doi:10.1190/1.1440058
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Toldi J. L. 1989 Velocity analysis without picking: Geophysics 54 191 199 doi:10.1190/1.1442643
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1071/EG10004
Loading
/content/journals/10.1071/EG10004
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error