Discussion: On ‘Negative apparent resistivity in dipole–dipole electrical surveys’ (Jung, H.K., Min, D.J., Lee, H.S., Oh, S.H., and Chung, H., Exploration Geophysics, 40, 33–40)

References

1. Beasley C. W. Ward S. H. 1986 Three-dimensional mise-a-la-masse modeling applied to mapping fracture zones: Geophysics 51 98 113 doi:10.1190/1.1442044
   [Google Scholar]
2. Cho I. K. 1989, Three-dimensional modeling and interpretation of cross-hole resistivity and magnetometric resistivity method: Ph.D dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea [in Korean with English abstract]
3. Cho I. K. Kim J. H. Chung S. H. Suh J. H. 2002 Negative apparent resistivity in resistivity method: Mulli-Tamsa 5 199 205 [in Korean with English abstract]
   [Google Scholar]
4. Jung H. K. Min D. J. Lee H. S. Oh S. H. Chung H. C. 2009 Negative apparent resistivity in dipole–dipole electrical survey: Exploration Geophysics 40 33 40 doi:10.1071/EG08111
   [Google Scholar]
5. Kaufman A. A. 1992, Geophysical field theory and method, part (A): Academic Press.
6. Okabe M. 1978, Time saving application of finite element method to Geophysics: US-Japan Seminar on Interdisciplinary Finite Element Analysis: Cornell University, Ithaca.
7. Pridmore D. F. Hohmann G. W. Ward S. H. Sill W. R. 1981 An investigation of finite element modeling for electrical and electromagnetic data in three dimensions: Geophysics 46 1009 1024 doi:10.1190/1.1441239
   [Google Scholar]
8. Snyder D. D. 1976 A method for modeling the resistivity and IP response of two dimensional bodies: Geophysics 41 997 1015 doi:10.1190/1.1440677
   [Google Scholar]
9. Spitzer K. 1995 A 3-D finite difference algorithm for DC resistivity modeling using conjugate gradient methods: Geophysical Journal International 123 903 914 doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.1995.tb06897.x
   [Google Scholar]
10. Ting S. C. Hohmann G. W. 1981 Integral equation modeling of three-dimensional magnetotelluric response: Geophysics 46 182 197 doi:10.1190/1.1441188
    [Google Scholar]