1887
Volume 41, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

We compute the depth to the top of magnetic basement using the Tilt-Depth method from the best available magnetic anomaly grids covering the continental USA and Australia. For the USA, the Tilt-Depth estimates were compared with sediment thicknesses based on drilling data and show a correlation of 0.86 between the datasets. If random data were used then the correlation value goes to virtually zero. There is little to no lateral offset of the depth of basinal features although there is a tendency for the Tilt-Depth results to be slightly shallower than the drill depths. We also applied the Tilt-Depth method to a local-scale, relatively high-resolution aeromagnetic survey over the Olympic Peninsula of Washington State. The Tilt-Depth method successfully identified a variety of important tectonic elements known from geological mapping. Of particular interest, the Tilt-Depth method illuminated deep (3 km) contacts within the non-magnetic sedimentary core of the Olympic Mountains, where magnetic anomalies are subdued and low in amplitude. For Australia, the Tilt-Depth estimates also give a good correlation with known areas of shallow basement and sedimentary basins. Our estimates of basement depth are not restricted to regional analysis but work equally well at the micro scale (basin scale) with depth estimates agreeing well with drill hole and seismic data. We focus on the eastern Officer Basin as an example of basin scale studies and find a good level of agreement between previously-derived basin models. However, our study potentially reveals depocentres not previously mapped due to the sparse distribution of well data. This example thus shows the potential additional advantage of the method in geological interpretation. The success of this study suggests that the Tilt-Depth method is useful in estimating the depth to crystalline basement when appropriate quality aeromagnetic anomaly data are used (i.e. line spacing on the order of or less than the expected depth to basement). The method is especially valuable as a reconnaissance tool in regions where drillhole or seismic information are either scarce, lacking, or ambiguous.

ASEG
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG10007
2010-09-01
2026-01-13

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1071/EG10007
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bally A. W. 1989, Phanerozoic basins of North America, in A. W. Bally and A. R. Palmer, eds, The Geology of North America – an overview: Geological Society of America, pp. 397–446.
  2. Blakely R. J. , Wells R. E. , and Weaver C. S. 1999, Puget Sound aeromagnetic maps and data: U.S Geological Survey Open-File Report 99–514, http://geopubs.wr.usgs.gov/open-file/of99-514, verified August 2010.
  3. Blakely R. J. Sherrod B. L. Hughes J. F. Anderson M. L. Wells R. E. Weaver C. S. 2009 Saddle Mountain fault deformation zone, Olympic Peninsula, Washington: Western boundary of the Seattle uplift: Geosphere 5 105 125 doi:10.1130/GES00196.1
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Borissova I. , and Kilgour B. 2000, Basement Relief Image of Australian Onshore and Offshore Sedimentary Basins Geoscience Australia GIS dataset, http://www.ga.gov.au/meta/ANZCW0703002747.html, verified August 2010.
  5. Haddad D. Watts A. B. Lindsay J. 2001 Evolution of the intracratonic Officer Basin, central Australia: implications from subsidence analysis and gravity modeling: Basin Research 13 217 238 doi:10.1046/j.1365-2117.2001.00147.x
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Heine C. 2007, Formation and evolution of intracontinental basins, PhD Thesis, University of Sydney.
  7. Jachens R. C. Griscom A. Roberts C. W. 1995 Regional extent of Great Valley basement west of the Great Valley, California: implications for extensive tectonic wedging in the California Coast Ranges: Journal of Geophysical Research 100 12 769 12 790 doi:10.1029/95JB00718
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Laske G. Masters S. G. 1997 A global digital map of sediment thickness: Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union 78 F483
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lee M. Morris B. Uglade H. 2010 Effect of signal amplitude on magnetic depth estimations: Leading Edge 29 672 677 doi:10.1190/1.3447778
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Miller H. G. Singh V. 1994 Potential field tilt – A new concept for location of potential field sources: Journal of Applied Geophysics 32 213 217 doi:10.1016/0926-9851(94)90022-1
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Milligan P. R. Franklin R. Ravat D. 2004 A new generation Magnetic Anomaly Grid Database of Australia (MAGDA): Preview 113 25 29
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Mushayandebvu M. F. van Driel P. Reid A. B. Fairhead J. D. 2001 Magnetic source parameters of two-dimensional structures using extended Euler deconvolution: Geophysics 66 814 823 doi:10.1190/1.1444971
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Mushayandebvu M. F. Lesur V. Reid A. B. Fairhead J. D. 2004 Grid Euler deconvolution with constraints for 2D structures: Geophysics 69 489 496 doi:10.1190/1.1707069
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Nabighian M.N. Grauch V.J.S. Hansen R.O. LaFehr T.R. Li Y. Peirce J.W. Phillips J.D. Ruder M.E. 2005 The historical development of the magnetic method in exploration: Geophysics 70 33ND 61ND doi:10.1190/1.2133784
    [Google Scholar]
  15. North American Magnetic Anomaly Group 2002, Magnetic anomaly map of North America: U.S Geological Survey Special Map, http://pubs.usgs.gov/sm/mag_map/, verified August 2010.
  16. Rajagopalan S. Milligan P. 1994 Image enhancement of aeromagnetic data using automatic gain control: Exploration Geophysics 25 173 178 doi:10.1071/EG994173
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ravat D. 1996 Analysis of the Euler method and its applicability in environmental magnetic investigations: Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics 1 229 238 doi:10.4133/JEEG1.3.229
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Reid A. B. Allsop J. M. Granser H. Millet A. J. Somerton I. W. 1990 Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution: Geophysics 55 80 91 doi:10.1190/1.1442774
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Salem A. Ravat D. 2003 A combined analytic signal and Euler method (AN-EUL) for automatic interpretation of magnetic data: Geophysics 68 1952 1961 doi:10.1190/1.1635049
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Salem A. Williams S. Fairhead J. D. Ravat D. Smith R. 2007 Tilt-Depth method: A simple depth estimation method using first-order magnetic derivatives: Leading Edge 26 1502 1505 doi:10.1190/1.2821934
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Snavely P. D. Jr , and Wagner H. C. 1963, Tertiary geologic history of western Oregon and Washington: Report of Investigation 22: Washington Division of Mines and Geology.
  22. Swain C. J. 2000 Reduction-to-the-pole of regional magnetic data with variable field direction, and its stabilisation at low inclinations: Exploration Geophysics 31 78 83 doi:10.1071/EG00078
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Tabor R. W. , and Cady W. M. 1978, The structure of the Olympic Mountains, Washington – analysis of a subduction zone: Professional Paper 1033: U.S Geological Survey.
  24. Thomas W. A. 1991 The Appalachian-Ouachita rifted margin of southeastern North America: Geological Society of America Bulletin 103 415 431 doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1991)103<0415:TAORMO>2.3.CO;2
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Thompson D. T. 1982 EULDPH: A new technique for making computer-assisted depth estimates from magnetic data: Geophysics 47 31 37 doi:10.1190/1.1441278
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Thurston J. B. Smith R. S. 1997 Automatic conversion of magnetic data to depth, dip, susceptibility contrast using the SPI™ method: Geophysics 62 807 813 doi:10.1190/1.1444190
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Vacquier V. , Steenland N. C. , Henderson R. G. , and Zietz I. 1951, Interpretation of Aeromagnetic Maps: Geological Society of America, Memoir47.
  28. Verduzco B. Fairhead J. D. Green C. M. MacKenzie C. 2004 New insights into magnetic derivatives for structural mapping: Leading Edge 23 116 119 doi:10.1190/1.1651454
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Wells R. E. Weaver C. S. Blakely R. J. 1998 Fore-arc migration in Cascadia and its neotectonic significance: Geology 26 759 762 doi:10.1130/0091-7613(1998)026<0759:FAMICA>2.3.CO;2
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Williams S. Fairhead J. D. Flanagan G. 2005 Comparison of grid Euler deconvolution with and without 2D constraints using realistic magnetic basement models: Geophysics 70 L13 L21 doi:10.1190/1.1925745
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1071/EG10007
Loading
Sedimentary basins reconnaissance using the magnetic Tilt-Depth method
Exploration Geophysics 41, 198 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1071/EG10007
/content/journals/10.1071/EG10007
/content/journals/10.1071/EG10007
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Australia, basement, USA.

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error