1887
Volume 41, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

A novel approach to the inversion of concentric loop electromagnetic (EM) data is through transformation of moving-source EM data to an equivalent fixed-source potential field. This equivalent potential field has been named as the surrogate potential field. The proposed approach then provides for example, efficient target depth estimates through Euler deconvolution. Under the quasi-static approximation, at each instant in the earth, diffuse loops of induced current are the source of the recorded response. Successive samples of the magnetic field of confined current loops can be mathematically manipulated to create a surrogate potential field from an equivalent constant induced current, as the surrogate potential field is proportional to the square root of the concentric loop EM response. Processing includes inspecting data and correcting for the sign ambiguity at suitably stable locations.

Correct surrogate potential field transformation relies on induced current systems being geometrically fixed in location, and as such will be predominantly correct for tabular conductors that are of relatively small size. For these small targets, stitched 1D layered-earth EM inversions often overestimate the depth of a small near-surface body. Unconfined currents induced in conductive overburden introduce a ‘background’ which requires subtraction before transformation to a surrogate potential. Confidence limits on solutions are part of a least-squares regression involving a cluster analysis. These form the basis for evaluation of the reliability with which the proposed method has estimated the target parameters from EM data. Successful estimations of target depth and location have been performed for synthetic horizontal and vertical tabular plate models, and with limitations for compact bodies represented by a spherical conductor. Three case studies illustrate the characteristics of the proposed method, illustrating useful results with limitations arising in field data and its processing.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG10022
2010-12-01
2026-01-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Blakely, R., 1996, Potential Theory in Gravity & Magnetic Applications: Cambridge.
  2. Cooper, G., Combrinck, M., and Cowan, D., 2004, The Application of Euler Deconvolution to Airborne EM Data: ASEG Extended Abstracts.
  3. Grant, F. S., and West, G. F., 1965, Interpretation Theory in Applied Geophysics: McGraw-Hill.
  4. Hill, S. M., Thomas, M., Earl, K., and Foster, K. A., 2005, Flying Doctor Ag-Pb-Zn Prospect Northern Leases Broken Hill in M. Cornelius C.R.M. Butt, K.M. Scott and I.D.M. Robertson (ed.) Regolith Expression of Australian Ore Systems: A Compilation of Geochemical Case Histories and Conceptual Models, CRC LEME Monograph, 146–148.
  5. Macnae, J., 1986, A Manual of Large-Loop EM Interpretation: Lamontagne Geophsyics.
  6. Macnae J. King A. Stolz N. Osmakoff A. Blaha A. 1998 Fast AEM data processing and inversion: Exploration Geophysics 29 163 169 10.1071/EG998163
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG998163 [Google Scholar]
  7. McDonald, P., 2008, A VTEM Survey Along the 2006 Central Victorian Seismic Transect: Department of Primary Industries.
  8. Mushayandebvu M. F. Lesur V. Reid A. B. Fairhead J. D. 2004 Grid Euler deconvolution with constraints for 2D structures: Geophysics 69 489 496 10.1190/1.1707069
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1707069 [Google Scholar]
  9. Reid A. B. Allsop J. M. Granser H. Millett A. J. Somerton I. W. 1990 Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution: Geophysics 55 80 91 10.1190/1.1442774
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442774 [Google Scholar]
  10. Reid J. Fitzpatrick A. Godber K. 2010 An overview of the skytem airborne EM system with Australian examples: Preview 145 26 37
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Roy A. 1966 Downward continuation and its application to electromagnetic data Interpretation: Geophysics 31 167 184 10.1190/1.1439727
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1439727 [Google Scholar]
  12. Ugalde H. Morris W. A. 2010 Cluster analysis of Euler deconvolution solutions: new filtering techniques and geologic strike determination: Geophysics 75 L61 L70 10.1190/1.3429997
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3429997 [Google Scholar]
  13. Wolfgram P. Sattel D. Christensen N. B., 2003 Approximate 2D inversion of AEM data: Exploration Geophysics 34 29 33 10.1071/EG03029
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG03029 [Google Scholar]
  14. Wolfgram P. Hyde M. Thomson S., 1998 How to find localised conductors in GEOTEM data: Exploration Geophysics 29 665 670 10.1071/EG998665
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG998665 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1071/EG10022
Loading
/content/journals/10.1071/EG10022
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error