Response to comments by Robert J. Whiteley on: Palmer, D., 2010. Is visual interactive ray trace an efficacious strategy for refraction inversion? Exploration Geophysics, 41, 260-267FN1

References

1. Backus G. E. Gilbert J. F. 1967Numerical applications of a formalism for geophysical inverse problems: Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 13 247 276
   [Google Scholar]
2. Backus G. E. Gilbert J. F. 1968The resolving power of gross earth data: Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 16 169 205
   [Google Scholar]
3. Backus G. E. Gilbert J. F. 1970Uniqueness in the inversion of inaccurate gross earth data: Philosophical Transactions Royal Society A 266 123 192 10.1098/rsta.1970.0005
   https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1970.0005 [Google Scholar]
4. Fell, R., MacGregor, P., and Stapledon, D., 2005, Geotechnical engineering of dams. CRC Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Harley, B. F., 1983, A geophysical case history of the Mt. Bulga Prospect: 3rd ASEG Conference and Exhibition, Brisbane (Extended Abstract), 110–115.
6. Helton J. C. , and Oberkampf W. L. 2004, Editors “Special Issue: Alternative Representations of Epistemic Uncertainty,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 85, nos. 1–3, July–Sept.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Helton J. C. Johnson J. D. Oberkampf W. L. 2004An Exploration of Alternative Approaches to the Representation of Uncertainty in Model Predictions: Reliability Engineering & System Safety 85 39 71 10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.025
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.025 [Google Scholar]
8. Ivanov J. Miller R. D. Xia J. Steeples D. Park C. B. 2005 a The inverse problem of refraction travel times, part I; types of geophysical nonuniqueness through minimization: Pure and Applied Geophysics 162 447 459 10.1007/s00024‑004‑2615‑1
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-004-2615-1 [Google Scholar]
9. Ivanov J. Miller R. D. Xia J. Steeples D. 2005 b The inverse problem of refraction travel times, part II; quantifying refraction nonuniqueness using a three-layer model: Pure and Applied Geophysics 162 461 477 10.1007/s00024‑004‑2616‑0
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-004-2616-0 [Google Scholar]
10. McKee M. Diethelm P. 2009Denialism: what is it and how should scientists respond? European Journal of Public Health 19 2 4 http://eurpub.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/19/1/2
    [Google Scholar]
11. Nichols T. C. 1980Rebound – its nature and effect on engineering works: Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology 13 133 152 10.1144/GSL.QJEG.1980.013.03.01
    https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.QJEG.1980.013.03.01 [Google Scholar]
12. Oberkampf W. L. 2005, Uncertainty quantification using evidence theory. Advanced simulation & computing workshop: Error estimation, uncertainty quantification, and reliability in numerical simulations. Stanford University.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Oldenburg D. W. 1984An introduction to linear inverse theory: Trans IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing GE-22 665 674
    [Google Scholar]
14. Oldenburg D. W. and Li Y. 2005, Inversion for applied geophysics: a tutorial, Dwain K Butler (ed.) Investigations in geophysics no. 13, 89–150, SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Palmer D. 1980, The generalized reciprocal method of seismic refraction interpretation. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 104p.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Palmer D. 1981An introduction to the generalized reciprocal method of seismic refraction interpretation: Geophysics 46 1508 1518 10.1190/1.1441157
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441157 [Google Scholar]
17. Palmer D. 1986, Refraction seismics: the lateral resolution of structure and seismic velocity. Geophysical Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Palmer D. 1992Is forward modeling as efficacious as minimum variance for refraction inversion? Exploration Geophysics 23 261 262, 521 10.1071/EG992261
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG992261 [Google Scholar]
19. Palmer D. 2001 a Imaging refractors with the convolution section: Geophysics 66 1582 1589 10.1190/1.1487103
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1487103 [Google Scholar]
20. Palmer D. 2001 b Resolving refractor ambiguities with amplitudes: Geophysics 66 1590 1593 10.1190/1.1487104
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1487104 [Google Scholar]
21. Palmer, D., 2003, Application of amplitudes in shallow seismic refraction inversion. 16th ASEG Conference and Exhibition, Adelaide (Extended Abstract).
22. Palmer D. 2006Refraction traveltime and amplitude corrections for very near-surface inhomogeneities: Geophysical Prospecting 54 589 604 10.1111/j.1365‑2478.2006.00567.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2006.00567.x [Google Scholar]
23. Palmer, D., 2007, Is it time to re-engineer geotechnical seismic refraction methods? 19th ASEG Conference and Exhibition, Perth (Extended Abstract).
24. Palmer D. 2008 a Is it time to re-engineer geotechnical seismic refraction methods? First Break 26 69 77
    [Google Scholar]
25. Palmer D. 2008b, Non-Uniqueness in near-surface refraction inversion, in Y. X. Xu, J. H. Xia, eds., Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Wuhan, China. Science Press, Beijing. 42–54.
26. Palmer D. 2009 a Maximising the lateral resolution of near-surface seismic refraction methods: Exploration 40 85 98 Geophysics 62 85 98 Butsuri-Tansa Mulli-Tamsa 12 85 98 10.1071/EG08119
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG08119 [Google Scholar]
27. Palmer D. 2009 b Integrating short and long wavelength time and amplitude statics: First Break 27 57 65
    [Google Scholar]
28. Palmer D. 2010 a Non-uniqueness with refraction inversion – a syncline model study: Geophysical Prospecting 58 203 218 10.1111/j.1365‑2478.2009.00818.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00818.x [Google Scholar]
29. Palmer D. 2010 b Non-uniqueness with refraction inversion – the Mt Bulga shear zone: Geophysical Prospecting 58 561 575 10.1111/j.1365‑2478.2009.00855.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00855.x [Google Scholar]
30. Palmer D. 2010 c Are refraction attributes more useful than refraction tomography? First Break 28 43 52
    [Google Scholar]
31. Palmer D. 2010 d Characterizing the near surface with detailed refraction attributes, in R. D Miller, J. H. Bradford and K. Hollinger, eds., Advances in near-surface seismology and ground-penetrating radar: SEG Geophysical Development Series No. 15, Chapter 14, 233–250.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Palmer D. 2010 e Is visual interactive ray trace an efficacious strategy for refraction inversion? Exploration Geophysics 41 260 267 10.1071/EG09028
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG09028 [Google Scholar]
33. Palmer D. 2010 f, Generating density models with seismic refraction data. 21st ASEG Conference & Exhibition, Sydney, (Extended Abstract).
34. Palmer D. 2010 g, Non-uniqueness with refraction inversion – a syncline model study: 21st ASEG Conference and Exhibition, Sydney (Extended Abstract).
35. Palmer D. 2010 h, Detailed refractor imaging with the RCS. 21st ASEG Conference & Exhibition, Sydney, (Extended Abstract).
36. Palmer D. 2010 i, Imaging the base of the weathering by stacking shot records. 21st ASEG Conference & Exhibition, Sydney, (Extended Abstract).
37. Palmer D. Shadlow J. 2008Integrating long- and short-wavelength statics with the generalized reciprocal method and the refraction convolution section: Exploration Geophysics 39 139 147 10.1071/EG08019
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG08019 [Google Scholar]
38. Reading A. M. Cracknell M. J. Sambridge M. 2011Turning geophysical data into geological information or why a broader range of mathematical strategies is needed to better enable discovery: Preview 151 24 29
    [Google Scholar]
39. Rohdewald S. Sheehan J. and Burton B. 2010, Processing of seismic refraction tomography data, SAGEEP Short Course Manual, Keystone, Colorado.http://rayfract.com/SAGEEP10.pdf
40. Schuster G. T. Quintus-Bosz A. 1993Wavepath eikonal traveltime inversion: theory: Geophysics 58 1314 1323 10.1190/1.1443514
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443514 [Google Scholar]
41. Sheehan J. R. Doll W. E. Mandell W. A. 2005An evaluation of methods and available software for seismic refraction tomography analysis: Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 10 21 34 10.2113/JEEG10.1.21
    https://doi.org/10.2113/JEEG10.1.21 [Google Scholar]
42. Simpson G. 2004Role of river incision in enhancing deformation: Geology 32 341 344 10.1130/G20190.2
    https://doi.org/10.1130/G20190.2 [Google Scholar]
43. 2010 Various authors State of Denial: A Special Report: New Scientist 206 2760 35 45
    [Google Scholar]
44. Whiteley R. J. 2004Shallow seismic refraction interpretation with visual interactive ray trace (VIRT) modeling: Exploration Geophysics 35 116 123 10.1071/EG04116
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG04116 [Google Scholar]
45. Whiteley R. J. 2011Comments on: Palmer, D., 2010. Is visual interactive ray trace an efficacious strategy for refraction inversion? Exploration Geophysics 41 260 267 Exploration Geophysics 42 207 217 10.1071/EG11023
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG11023 [Google Scholar]
46. Whiteley R. J. Eccleston P. J. 2006Comparison of shallow seismic refraction interpretation methods for regolith mapping: Exploration Geophysics 37 340 347 10.1071/EG06340
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG06340 [Google Scholar]
47. Whiteley R. J. and Leung T. M. undated, Mt Bulga revisited:http://rayfract.com/pub/Mt_Bulga_Revisited.pdf
48. Whiteley, R. J., Hawkins, L. V., and Govett, G. J. S., 1984, The seismic, electrical, and electrogeochemical character of the Mount Bulga massive sulphide orebody, NSW., Australia. SEG Expanded Abstracts 310 – 314.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Zaruba, Q., 1956, Bulged valleys and their importance for foundations of dams: Transactions of the Sixth International Congress for large dams, New York, pp. 509–515.