1887
Volume 43, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Shot-profile-based prestack depth migration is quite attractive for sparse-shot wide-azimuth geometries. Meanwhile, angle-domain common image gathers (ADCIGs) have become an essential tool in seismic processing (e.g. velocity analysis). In this paper, we first revisit the popular schemes of generating ADCIGs by wavefield continuation migration. Then we present an alternative approach to produce common-angle image gathers after shot-profile migration based on a one-way wave equation. The angle information is obtained from a division of two images: the conventional image and the angle-weighted image. The effects of sparse shot sampling on extracting ADCIGs have been investigated. Numerical results demonstrate that the described scheme is efficient and stable and can handle the problem of shot-aliasing well.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG11038
2012-03-01
2026-01-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Biondi B. Symes W. W. 2004 Angle-domain common-image gathers for migration velocity analysis by wavefield-continuation imaging: Geophysics 69 1283 1298 10.1190/1.1801945
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1801945 [Google Scholar]
  2. Brandsberg-Dahl, S., de Hoop, M., and Ursin, B., 1999, Velocity analysis in the common scattering-angle/azimuth domain: 69th Annual International Meeting Society Explororation Geophysics, Expanded Abstracts, 1715–1718.
  3. Claerbout, J. F., 1985, Imaging the earth’s interior: Blackwell Scientific Publications, Inc.
  4. de Bruin C. G. M. Wapenaar C. P. A. Berkhout A. J. 1990 Angle dependent reflectivity by means of prestack migration: Geophysics 55 1223 1234 10.1190/1.1442938
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442938 [Google Scholar]
  5. Fomel S. 2011 Theory of 3-D angle gathers in wave-equation seismic imaging: Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technologies 1 11 16 10.1007/s13202‑011‑0004‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-011-0004-8 [Google Scholar]
  6. Mosher, C., and Foster, D., 2000, Common angle imaging conditions for prestack depth migration: 70th Annual International Meeting Society Explororation Geophysics, Expanded Abstracts, 830–833.
  7. Prucha, M., Biondi, B., and Symes, W., 1999, Angle-domain common image gathers by wave-equation migration: 69th Annual International Meeting Society Explororation Geophysics, Expanded Abstracts, 824–827.
  8. Rickett J. Sava P. 2002 Offset and angle-domain common imagepoint gathers for shot-profile migration: Geophysics 67 883 889 10.1190/1.1484531
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1484531 [Google Scholar]
  9. Sava P. C. Fomel S. 2003 Angle-domain common-image gathers by wavefield continuation methods: Geophysics 68 1065 1074 10.1190/1.1581078
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1581078 [Google Scholar]
  10. Stoffa P. L. Fokkema J. T. Freire R. M. L. Kessinger W. P. 1990 Split-step Fourier migration: Geophysics 55 410 421 10.1190/1.1442850
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442850 [Google Scholar]
  11. Stolk C. C. Symes W. W. 2004 Kinematic artifacts in prestack depth migration: Geophysics 69 562 575 10.1190/1.1707076
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1707076 [Google Scholar]
  12. Sun W. Zhou B. Fu L. Y. 2010 Dip angle-compensated one-way wave equation migration: Exploration Geophysics 41 137 145 10.1071/EG09027
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG09027 [Google Scholar]
  13. Thorbecke J. Berkhout A. J. 2006 Recursive prestack depth migration using CFP gathers: Geophysics 71 S273 S283 10.1190/1.2348517
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2348517 [Google Scholar]
  14. Tygel M. Schleicher J. Hubral P. Hanitzch C. 1993 Multiple weights in diffraction stack migration: Geophysics 58 1820 1830 10.1190/1.1443397
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443397 [Google Scholar]
  15. van Vliet., L. J, and Verbeek, P. W., 1995, Estimators for orientation and anisotropy in digitized images: Proceedings of the first Conference of the Advanced School for Computing and Imaging, Heijen (The Netherlands), 442–450.
  16. Xie, X. B., and Wu, R. S., 2002, Extracting angle domain information from migrated wavefield: 72nd Annual International Meeting Society Explororation Geophysics, Expanded Abstracts, 1360–1363.
  17. Xu S. Chauris H. Lambaré G. Noble M. 2001 Common-angle migration: a strategy for imaging complex media Geophysics 66 1877 1894 10.1190/1.1487131
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1487131 [Google Scholar]
  18. Xu S. Zhang Y. Tang B. 2011 3D angle gathers from reverse time migration: Geophysics 76 S77 S92 10.1190/1.3536527
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3536527 [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhang, Y., Xu, S., Zhang, G., and Bleistein, N., 2005, Angle domain true amplitudewave equation migration: 67th Annual Conference and Exhibition, EAGE, Extended Abstracts, F045.
  20. Zhang Y. Xu S. Bleistein N. Zhang G. 2007 True-amplitude, angle-domain, common-image gathers from one-way wave-equation migrations Geophysics 72 S49 S58 10.1190/1.2399371
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2399371 [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhang Y. Xu S. Tang B. Huang Y. Huang T. 2010 Angle gathers from reverse time migration The Leading Edge 29 1364 1371 10.1190/1.3517308
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3517308 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1071/EG11038
Loading
/content/journals/10.1071/EG11038
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): common-angle image gathers; one-way wave equation; shot-profile migration.

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error