1887
Volume 43, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

[

Based on the assumption of the equivalent velocity and offset, the converted wave travel-time equation, which has a double square root due to the asymmetric ray-path of the down-going -wave and the up-coming -wave, can be transformed into a single square root equation if the common scatterpoint (CSP) gathers are binned. This method simplifies the equation and decreases the errors of converted wave migration transferred by -wave velocity error, compared to the equivalent offset method (EOM) migration proposed by Bancroft, Geiger and Foltinek . In this paper, the errors caused by the introduction of equivalent velocity for the -wave are analysed in detail. The discrete errors and effects introduced by discretization of the equivalent offset are presented, and finally the conditions for applying CSP gathers for -wave processing under the control of reasonable error limits are derived.

,

Under the assumption of the equivalent velocity, the converted wave can be easily migrated in the time domain based on the equivalent offset method (EOM). In this paper, the analysis of errors caused by the introduction of the equivalent velocity for the -wave and the conditions for applying common scatterpoint (CSP) gathers are presented.

]
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG11039
2012-09-01
2026-01-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bancroft, J. C., and Geiger, H. D., 1996, Velocity sensitivity for equivalent offset prestack migration: a contrast in robustness and fragility: CSEG National Convention, Expanded Abstracts, 149–150.
  2. Bancroft, J. C., and Wang, S., 1994, Converted-wave prestack migration and velocity analysis by equivalent offsets and CCP gathers: CREWES Research Report, 6, 28.1–28.7.
  3. Bancroft, J. C., Geiger, H. D., and Foltinek, D., 1994, Prestack migration by equivalent offset and CSP gathers: CREWES Research Report, 6, 27.1–27.13.
  4. Bancroft, J. C., Geiger, H., Wang, S., and Foltinek, D., 1995, Prestack migration by equivalent offset and CSP gathers: an update: CREWES Research Report, 7, 27.1–27.10.
  5. Bancroft J. C. Geiger H. D. Margrave G. F. 1998 The equivalent offset method of prestack time migration: Geophysics 63 2042 2053 10.1190/1.1444497
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444497 [Google Scholar]
  6. Dai H. Li X.-Y. 2007 Velocity model updating in prestack Kirchhoff time migration for PS converted waves: Part I – Theory: Geophysical Prospecting 55 525 547 10.1111/j.1365‑2478.2007.00629.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00629.x [Google Scholar]
  7. Li, X. Y., and Bancroft, J. C., 1997, Converted wave migration and common conversion point binning by equivalent offset: 67th Annual International Management Social Exploration Geophysics Expanded Abstracts, 1587–1590.
  8. Wang, S., Bancroft, J. C., and Lawton, D. C., 1996, Converted-wave (P-SV) prestack migration and migration velocity analysis: 66th Annual International Management Social Exploration Geophysics Expanded Abstracts, 1575–1578.
  9. Wei W. Junjie Y. Xuewei L. Junmeng Z. Yun W. Ying H. 2007 Equivalent offset method and its application: Chinese Journal of Geophysics 50 1580 1587
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1071/EG11039
Loading
/content/journals/10.1071/EG11039
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): converted wave; EOM; equivalent offset; equivalent velocity; error analysis

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error