1887
Volume 43, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

[

To simulate wave propagation in a tilted transversely isotropic (TTI) medium with a tilting symmetry-axis of anisotropy, we develop a 2D elastic forward modelling algorithm. In this algorithm, we use the staggered-grid finite-difference method which has fourth-order accuracy in space and second-order accuracy in time. Since velocity-stress formulations are defined for staggered grids, we include auxiliary grid points in the -direction to meet the free surface boundary conditions for shear stress. Through comparisons of displacements obtained from our algorithm, not only with analytical solutions but also with finite element solutions, we are able to validate that the free surface conditions operate appropriately and elastic waves propagate correctly. In order to handle the artificial boundary reflections efficiently, we also implement convolutional perfectly matched layer (CPML) absorbing boundaries in our algorithm. The CPML sufficiently attenuates energy at the grazing incidence by modifying the damping profile of the PML boundary. Numerical experiments indicate that the algorithm accurately expresses elastic wave propagation in the TTI medium. At the free surface, the numerical results show good agreement with analytical solutions not only for body waves but also for the Rayleigh wave which has strong amplitude along the surface. In addition, we demonstrate the efficiency of CPML for a homogeneous TI medium and a dipping layered model. Only using 10 grid points to the CPML regions, the artificial reflections are successfully suppressed and the energy of the boundary reflection back into the effective modelling area is significantly decayed.

,

In this study, we developed a forward modelling algorithm with the staggered-grid finite-difference method. The elastic wave propagation in 2D tilted transversely isotropic media is well simulated using this algorithm. We also implement convolutional perfectly matched layer absorbing boundaries in our algorithm in order to handle the artificial boundary reflection efficiently.

]
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG12015
2012-06-01
2026-01-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alkhalifah T. 2000 An acoustic wave equation for anisotropic media: Geophysics 65 1239 1250 10.1190/1.1444815
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444815 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bécache E. Fauqueux S. Joly P. 2003 Stability of perfectly matched layers, group velocities and anisotropic waves: Journal of Computational Physics 188 399 433 10.1016/S0021‑9991(03)00184‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9991(03)00184-0 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bérenger J. P. 1994 A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves: Journal of Computational Physics 114 185 200 10.1006/jcph.1994.1159
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1994.1159 [Google Scholar]
  4. Cerjan C. Kosloff D. Kosloff R. Reshef M. 1985 A nonreflecting boundary condition for discrete acoustic and elastic wave equation: Geophysics 50 705 708 10.1190/1.1441945
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441945 [Google Scholar]
  5. Clayton R. Engquist B. 1977 Absorbing boundary conditions for acoustic and elastic wave equations: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 67 1529 1540
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Collino F. Tsogka C. 2001 Application of the PML absorbing layer model to the linear elastodynamic problem in anisotropic heterogeneous media: Geophysics 66 294 307 10.1190/1.1444908
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444908 [Google Scholar]
  7. Elapavuluri, P., and Bancroft, J. C., 2005, Finite difference modeling in structurally complex anisotropic medium: 75th Ann. Internat. Mtg. Soc. Explor. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 100–103.
  8. Engquist B. Majda A. 1977 Absorbing boundary conditions for the numerical simulation of waves: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 31 629 651
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ewing, W. M., Tardetzky, W. S., and Press, F., 1957, Elastic waves in layered media: McGraw–Hill.
  10. Faria E. L. Stoffa P. L. 1994 Finite-difference modeling in transversely isotropic media: Geophysics 59 282 289 10.1190/1.1443590
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443590 [Google Scholar]
  11. Graves R. W. 1996 Simulating seismic wave propagation in 3D elastic media using staggered-grid finite differences: Bulletin of the Seismic Society of America 86 1091 1106
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hastings F. D. Schneider J. B. Broschat S. L. 1996 Application of the perfectly matched layer (PML) absorbing boundary condition to elastic wave propagation: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100 3061 3069 10.1121/1.417118
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.417118 [Google Scholar]
  13. Higdon R. L. 1991 Absorbing boundary conditions for elastic waves: Geophysics 56 231 241 10.1190/1.1443035
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443035 [Google Scholar]
  14. Igel H. Mora P. Riollet B. 1995 Anisotropic wave propagation through finite-difference grids: Geophysics 60 1203 1216 10.1190/1.1443849
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443849 [Google Scholar]
  15. Juhlin C. 1995 Finite-difference elastic wave propagation in 2D heterogeneous transversely isotropic media: Geophysical Prospecting 43 843 858 10.1111/j.1365‑2478.1995.tb00284.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1995.tb00284.x [Google Scholar]
  16. Komatitsch D. Martin R. 2007 An unsplit convolutional perfectly matched layer improved at grazing incidence for the seismic wave equation: Geophysics 72 SM155 SM167 10.1190/1.2757586
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2757586 [Google Scholar]
  17. Komatitsch D. Tromp J. 2003 A Perfectly Matched Layer (PML) absorbing condition for the second-order elastic wave equation: Geophysical Journal International 154 146 153 10.1046/j.1365‑246X.2003.01950.x
    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01950.x [Google Scholar]
  18. Komatitsch D. Barnes C. Tromp J. 2000 Simulation of anisotropic wave propagation based upon a spectral element method: Geophysics 65 1251 1260 10.1190/1.1444816
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444816 [Google Scholar]
  19. Levander A. R. 1988 Fourth-order finite-difference P-SV seismograms: Geophysics 53 1425 1436 10.1190/1.1442422
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442422 [Google Scholar]
  20. Martin R. Komatitsch D. Ezziani A. 2008 An unsplit convolutional perfectly matched layer improved at grazing incidence for seismic wave propagation in poroelastic media: Geophysics 73 T51 T61 10.1190/1.2939484
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2939484 [Google Scholar]
  21. Mur G. 1981 Absorbing boundary conditions for the finite-difference approximation of the time-domain electromagnetic field equations: Electromagnetic Compatibility 23 377 382 10.1109/TEMC.1981.303970
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMC.1981.303970 [Google Scholar]
  22. Operto S. Virieux J. Ribodetti A. Anderson J. E. 2009 Finite-difference frequency-domain modeling of viscoacoustic wave propagation in 2D tilted transversely isotropic (TTI) media: Geophysics 74 T75 T95 10.1190/1.3157243
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3157243 [Google Scholar]
  23. Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., Flannery, B. P., 1992, Numerical recipes in Fortran: the art of scientific computing: Cambridge University Press.
  24. Reynolds A. C. 1978 Boundary conditions for the numerical solution of wave propagation problems: Geophysics 43 1099 1110 10.1190/1.1440881
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440881 [Google Scholar]
  25. Roden J. A. Gedney S. D. 2000 Convolution PML (CPML): an efficient FDTD implementation of the CFS-PML for arbitrary media: Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 27 334 339 10.1002/1098‑2760(20001205)27:5<334::AID‑MOP14>3.0.CO;2‑A
    https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2760(20001205)27:5<334::AID-MOP14>3.0.CO;2-A [Google Scholar]
  26. Shin C. 1995 Sponge boundary condition for frequency-domain modelling: Geophysics 60 1870 1874 10.1190/1.1443918
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443918 [Google Scholar]
  27. Thomsen L. 1986 Weak elastic anisotropy: Geophysics 51 1954 1966 10.1190/1.1442051
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442051 [Google Scholar]
  28. Virieux J. 1984 SH-wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity-stress finite-difference method: Geophysics 49 1933 1957 10.1190/1.1441605
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441605 [Google Scholar]
  29. Virieux J. 1986 P-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity-stress finite-difference method: Geophysics 51 889 901 10.1190/1.1442147
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442147 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1071/EG12015
Loading
/content/journals/10.1071/EG12015
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): anisotropy; boundary condition; elastic modelling; TTI media

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error