The application of Monte Carlo modelling to downhole total-count logging of uranium: part II – high grade mineralisation

References

1. Agostinelli S. et al 2003 Geant4—a simulation toolkit: Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 506 250 303 10.1016/S0168‑9002(03)01368‑8
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8 [Google Scholar]
2. ASTM, 2006, ASTM D6274–98 (2004) standard guide for conducting borehole geophysical logging – gamma: ASTM International.
3. Borshoff, J., and Faris, I., 1990, Angela and Pamela uranium deposits, in F. E. Hughes, ed., Geology of the mineral deposits of Australia and Papua New Guinea: Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Monograph 15, 1139–1142.
4. Crew M. E. Berkoff E. W. 1970 TWOPIT, a different approach to calibration of gamma-ray logging equipment: The Log Analyst 11 26 32
   [Google Scholar]
5. Czubek, J. A., 1976, Comparison of nuclear well logging data with the results of core analysis: the significance of well logging in geological exploration: Nuclear Technology in Geochemistry & Geophysics, IAEA Vienna, 93–106.
6. Dickson B. L. 2012 Reassessment of the grades of the Adelaide model logging pits: Preview 159 20 23
   [Google Scholar]
7. Dickson B. L. Beckitt G. 2013 The application of Monte Carlo modelling to downhole total-count logging of uranium: part I – low grade mineralisation: Exploration Geophysics 44 56 62 10.1071/EG12018
   https://doi.org/10.1071/EG12018 [Google Scholar]
8. Dickson B. L. Craig M. 2012 Deconvolving gamma-ray logs by adaptive zone refinement: Geophysics 77 D159 D169 10.1190/geo2012‑0036.1
   https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2012-0036.1 [Google Scholar]
9. Dodd, P. H., and Eschliman, D. H., 1971, Borehole logging techniques for uranium exploration and evaluation, in S. H. U. Bowie, M. Davis, and D. Ostle, eds., Uranium prospecting handbook: proceedings of a NATO sponsored advanced study institute on methods of prospecting for uranium minerals: Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, London, 244–276.
10. George, D. C., 1982, Total count gamma-ray logging: correction factors and logging model grade assignments, in Uranium exploration methods, proceedings symposium Paris: Nuclear Energy Agency, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 729–751.
11. Guatelli S. Mantero A. Mascialino B. Nieminen P. Pia M. G. 2007 Geant4 atomic relaxation: IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 54 585 593 10.1109/TNS.2007.896214
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2007.896214 [Google Scholar]
12. Jackson, D. G., and Andrew, R. L., 1990, Kintyre uranium deposit, in F. E. Hughes, ed., Geology of the mineral deposits of Australia and PNG: The AusIMM (Melbourne), 653–658.
13. Root, J. C., and Robertson, W. J., 1994, Geophysical signature of the Kintyre uranium deposit, WA, in M. C. Dentith, K. F. Frankcombe, S. E. Ho, J. M. Shepherd, D. I. Groves, and A. Trench, eds., Geophysical signatures of WA mineral deposits: Geology and Geophysics Department (Key Centre) and UWA Extension, The University of Western Australia, Pub. No. 26, 371–381.
14. Scott, J. H., 1980, Pitfalls in determining the dead time of nuclear well-logging probes: Twenty-First Annual Logging Symposium Transactions, Society of Professional Well Log Analysts, Paper H.