Alternative local wavenumber methods to estimate magnetic source parameters

References

1. Blakely, R. J., 1995, Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bracewell, R. N., 1965, The Fourier transform and its application: McGraw Hill Book Co.
3. Huang, D., Gubbins, D., Clark, R. A., and Whaler, K. A., 1995, Combined study of Euler’s homogeneity equation for gravity and magnetic field: 57th EAGE conference, Glasgow, UK, Extended Abstracts, 144.
4. Keating P. 2009 Improved use of the local wavenumber in potential-field interpretation: Geophysics 74 L75 L85 10.1190/1.3242270
   https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3242270 [Google Scholar]
5. Kirkham, K., 2001, Investigations of a high-resolution aeromagnetic survey over the southeastern portion of the Illinois Basin: M.Sc. thesis, Southern Illinois University of Carbondale.
6. Ma G. Q. 2013 Improved local wavenumber methods in the interpretation of potential field data: Pure and Applied Geophysics 170 633 643 10.1007/s00024‑012‑0551‑z
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-012-0551-z [Google Scholar]
7. Ma G. Du X. Li L. 2012 Interpretation of potential field tensor data using the tensor local wavenumber method and the comparison with the conventional local wavenumber method: Chinese Journal of Geophysics 55 380 393 10.1002/cjg2.1733
   https://doi.org/10.1002/cjg2.1733 [Google Scholar]
8. Nabighian N. Grauch V. J. S. Hansen R. O. LaFehr T. R. Li Y. Peirce J. W. Phillips J. D. Ruder M. E. 2005 The historical development of the magnetic method in exploration: Geophysics 70 33 61
   [Google Scholar]
9. Pilkington M Keating P. 2006 The relationship between local wavenumber and analytic signal in magnetic interpretation: Geophysics 71 L1 L3 10.1190/1.2163911
   https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2163911 [Google Scholar]
10. Reid A. B. Allsop J. M. Granser H. Millet A. J. Somerton I. W. 1990 Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution.: Geophysics 55 80 91 10.1190/1.1442774
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442774 [Google Scholar]
11. Salem A. 2005 Interpretation of magnetic data using analytic signal derivatives: Geophysical Prospecting 53 75 82 10.1111/j.1365‑2478.2005.00434.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2005.00434.x [Google Scholar]
12. Salem A. Smith R. S. 2005 Depth and structural index from the normalized local wavenumber of 2D magnetic anomalies: Geophysical Prospecting 53 83 89 10.1111/j.1365‑2478.2005.00435.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2005.00435.x [Google Scholar]
13. Salem A. Ravat D. Smith R. Ushijima K. 2005 Interpretation of magnetic data using an enhanced local wavenumber (ELW) method: Geophysics 70 L7 L12 10.1190/1.1884828
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1884828 [Google Scholar]
14. Salem A. Williams S. Fairhead D. Smith R. Ravat D. 2008 Interpretation of magnetic data using tilt-angle derivatives: Geophysics 73 L1 L10 10.1190/1.2799992
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2799992 [Google Scholar]
15. Smith R. S. Salem A. 2005 Imaging depth, structural and susceptibility from magnetic data: the advanced source-parameter imaging method: Geophysics 70 141 151
    [Google Scholar]
16. Smith R. S. Thurston J. B. Dai T. Macleod I. N. 1998 iSPI — the improved source parameter imaging method: Geophysical Prospecting 46 141 151 10.1046/j.1365‑2478.1998.00084.x
    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2478.1998.00084.x [Google Scholar]
17. Thompson D. T. 1982 EULDPH: a new technique for making computer-assisted depth estimates from magnetic data: Geophysics 47 31 37 10.1190/1.1441278
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441278 [Google Scholar]
18. Thurston J. B. Smith R. S. 1997 Automatic conversion of magnetic data to depth, dip, and susceptibility contrast using the SPI method: Geophysics 62 807 813 10.1190/1.1444190
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444190 [Google Scholar]
19. Thurston J. B. Smith R. S. Guillon J. 2002 A multi-model method for depth estimation from magnetic data: Geophysics 67 555 561 10.1190/1.1468616
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1468616 [Google Scholar]