1887
Volume 44, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

A discrete conductive sphere model in which current paths are constrained to a single planar orientation (the ‘dipping sphere’) is used to calculate the secondary response from Geotech Ltd’s VTEM airborne time domain electromagnetic (EM) system. In addition to calculating the time constants of the B-field and responses, we focus on the time-constant ratio at a late time interval and compare numerical results with several field examples. For very strong conductors with conductivity above a critical value, both the B-field and responses show decreasing values as the conductivity increases. Therefore response does not uniquely define conductivity. However, calculation of time constants for the decay removes the ambiguity and allows discrimination of high and low conductivity targets. A further benefit is gained by comparing the time constants of the B-field and decays, which co-vary systematically over a wide range of target conductance. An advantage of calculating time constant ratios is that the ratios are insensitive to the dip and the depth of the targets and are stable across the conductor. Therefore we propose to use their ratio  = / as a tool to estimate the size and conductivity of mineral deposits. Using the VTEM base frequency, the magnitude of reaches a limiting value of 1.32 for the most highly conductive targets. Interpretations become more complicated in the presence of conductive overburden, which appears to cause the limiting value of to increase to 2 or more.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG13042
2013-12-01
2026-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abramowitz, M., and Stegun, I. A., 1965, Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables: US Government Print Off.
  2. Asten M. W. Duncan A. W. 2012 The quantitative advantage of using B-field sensors in time-domain EM measurement for mineral exploration and unexploded ordnance search: Geophysics 77 WB137 WB148 10.1190/geo2011‑0385.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011-0385.1 [Google Scholar]
  3. Balch, S. J., Mungall, J. E., and Niemi, J., 2010, Present and future geophysical methods for Ni-Cu-PGE exploration: lessons from McFaulds Lake, Northern Ontario: SEG Special Publication 15, 559–572.
  4. Fiset, N., Acorn, W., Legault, J., and Smith, G., 2010, Report on a helicopter-borne versatile time-domain electromagnetic (VTEM) and aeromagnetic geophysical survey: Geotech Ltd, Project 10034.
  5. Grant, F. S., and West, G. F., 1965, Interpretation theory in applied geophysics: McGraw Hill.
  6. Gray, M. J., 1989, 1988 Diamond Drill Programme Assessment Report - TH Option - Cartier Area: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Assessment Report 41112NE0064 16.
  7. Hurley D. G. 1977 The effect of a conductive overburden on the transient electromagnetic response of a sphere: Geoexploration 15 77 85 10.1016/0016‑7142(77)90014‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7142(77)90014-X [Google Scholar]
  8. Kuzmin, P. V., and Morrison, E. B., 2008, Bucking coil and B-field measurement and apparatus for time domain electromagnetic measurements: United States patent application publication No. US2010/0052685 A1.
  9. Lamontagne, Y., 1975, Applications of wideband, time domain, EM measurements in mineral exploration: Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto
  10. McCracken K. G. Oritaglio M. L. Hohmann G. W. 1986 A comparison of electromagnetic exploration systems: Geophysics 51 810 818 10.1190/1.1442133
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442133 [Google Scholar]
  11. Pearce C. I. Pattrick R. A. D. Vaughan D. J. 2006 Electrical and magnetic properties of sulphides: Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry 61 127 180 10.2138/rmg.2006.61.3
    https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2006.61.3 [Google Scholar]
  12. Riedel, M., Willoughby E. C., and Chopra, S., 2010, Gas hydrates geophysical exploration techniques and methods, in M. Riedel, E. C. Willoughby, and S. Chopra, eds., Geophysical Characterization of Gas Hydrates: SEG Geophysical Development Series, 14, 1–22.
  13. Smith R. S. Annan A. P. 1998 The use of B-field measurement in an airborne time-domain system: Part I. Benefits of B-field versus dB/dt: Exploration Geophysics 29 24 29 10.1071/EG998024
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG998024 [Google Scholar]
  14. Smith R. S. Annan A. P. 2000 Using an induction coil sensor to indirectly measure the B-field response in the bandwidth of the transient electromagnetic method: Geophysics 65 1489 1494 10.1190/1.1444837
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444837 [Google Scholar]
  15. Smith R. S. Lee T. J. 2001 The impulse-response moments of a conductive sphere in a uniform field, a versatile and efficient electromagnetic model: Exploration Geophysics 32 113 118 10.1071/EG01113
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG01113 [Google Scholar]
  16. Smith R. S. Wasylechko R. 2012 Sensitivity cross-sections in airborne electromagnetic methods using discrete conductors: Exploration Geophysics 43 95 103 10.1071/EG11048
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG11048 [Google Scholar]
  17. Smith R. S. West G. F. 1988 Inductive interaction between polarizable conductors: an explanation of a negative coincident-loop transient electromagnetic response: Geophysics 53 677 690 10.1190/1.1442502
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442502 [Google Scholar]
  18. Ward, S. H., and Hohmann, G. W. 1988, Electromagnetic theory for geophysical applications, in M. N. Nabighian, ed., Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics: SEG Special Volume 2, 131–311.
  19. West, G. F., and Macnae, J. C., 1991, Physics of the electromagnetic induction exploration method, in M. N. Nabighian, ed., Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics: SEG Special Volume 2, Part A, 1–45.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG13042
Loading
/content/journals/10.1071/EG13042
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): B-field, dB/dt; decay constant; overburden; time constant ratio; time-domain EM

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error