1887
Volume 45, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

[

Ocean bottom topography significantly influences the application of marine controlled source electromagnetics. Distortions in the electromagnetic field shape and behaviour associated with the airwave, bathymetry and potential hydrocarbon targets can be observed using streamlines and can point towards survey designs that may not have been considered.

,

Seafloor topography must influence the strength and direction of electromagnetic fields generated during deep ocean controlled source electromagnetic surveying. Neither mathematical equation nor rules of thumb provide a clear perspective of how changes in water column thickness alters electromagnetic fields that engulf hundreds of cubic kilometres of air, ocean, host and reservoir. We use streamline visualisation to provide a generalised representation of how electromagnetic fields propagate into a 2D geo-electrical setting that includes strong bathymetry. Of particular interest are: (i)’ dead zones’ where electric fields at the ocean floor are demonstrated to be weak and (ii) the ’airwave’ that appears in the electric field streamlines as circulating vortices with a shape that is clearly influenced by changes in ocean depth. Our analysis of the distribution of electric fields for deep and shallow water examples alludes to potential benefits from placement of receivers and/or transmitters higher in the water column as is the case for towed receiver geometries. Real-time streamline representation probably holds the most value at the survey planning stage, especially for shallow water marine EM surveys where ocean bottom topography is likely to be consequential.

]
© 2014 ASEG
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG13050
2014-09-01
2026-01-18

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1071/EG13050
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amundsen L. Laseth L. Mittet R. Ellingsrud S. Ursin B. 2006 Decomposition of electromagnetic fields into upgoing and downgoing components: Geophysics 71 G211 G223
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Andreis D. MacGregor L. 2008 Controlled-source electromagnetic sounding in shallow water: principles and applications: Geophysics 73 F21 F32
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barsukov P. O. Fainberg E. B. 2013 A mobile time-domain sounding system for shallow water: First Break 31 53 63
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen J. Alumbaugh D. L. 2011 Three methods for mitigating airwaves in shallow water marine controlled-source electromagnetic data: Geophysics 76 F89 F99
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Davydycheva S. Rykhlinski N. 2011 Focused-source electromagnetic survey versus standard CSEM: 3D modeling in complex geometries: Geophysics 76 F27 F41
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fischer P. 2005 New EM technology offerings are growing quickly: World Oil 226 1 9
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Han N. Nam M. Kim H. 2010 An analysis on 3D marine CSEM responses based on a finite difference method: 1 4
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hansen, C., and Johnson, C., 2004, Visualization handbook: Elsevier Science.
  9. Hesthammer J. Stefatos A. Boulaenko M. Vereshagin A. Gelting P. Wedberg T. Maxwell G. 2010 CSEM technology as a value driver for hydrocarbon exploration: Marine and Petroleum Geology 27 1872 1884
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Li Y. Constable S. 2007 2D marine controlled-source electromagnetic modeling: part 2 – the effect of bathymetry: Geophysics 72 WA63 WA71
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Maxwell, J. C., 1881, A treatise on electricity and magnetism, Volume 1: Clarendon Press.
  12. Nguyen, A. K., and Roth, F., 2010, Application of the frequency differenced field to 3D inversion of shallow water CSEM data: EGM 2010 International Workshop: Adding New Value to Electromagnetic, Gravity and Magnetic Methods for Exploration, 1–5.
  13. Pethick, A., and Harris, B., 2012, Open source interactive electromagnetic modelling: ASEG Extended Abstracts 2012, 1–4.
  14. Pethick A. Harris B. 2013 a Interpreting marine controlled source electromagnetic field behaviour with streamlines: Computers & Geosciences 60 1 10
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Pethick, A., and Harris, B., 2013b, Poynting vector streamlines and the marine controlled source electromagnetic airwave: 75th EAGE Conference and Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2013, Extended Abstracts, 1–10.
  16. Pound G. 2007 Multi-transient EM technology at PGS: Tech Link 7 1 8
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Scholl, C., and Sinkevich, V. A., 2012, Modeling MCSEM data with a finite difference approach and an unstructured model grid in the presence of bathymetry: 21st EM Induction Workshop, 1.
  18. Thirud P. 2002 Waves of information: Scandinavian Oil and Gas Magazine 3 8 9
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang, S., and Zhdanov, M. S., 2010, Removal of the airwave effect on MCSEM data by separation of the main part of the anomalous field: SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 732–736. 10.1190/1.3513887
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3513887
  20. Weidelt P. 2007 Guided waves in marine CSEM: Geophysical Journal International 171 153 176
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhdanov, M., 2009, Geophysical electromagnetic theory and methods: Elsevier.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG13050
Loading
Bathymetry, electromagnetic streamlines and the marine controlled source electromagnetic methodFN1
Exploration Geophysics 45, 208 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1071/EG13050
/content/journals/10.1071/EG13050
/content/journals/10.1071/EG13050
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): bathymetry, CSEM, marine, MCSEM, seafloor, streamlines, topography, visualisation.

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error