1887
Volume 45, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

[

Analysing seismic data for direct hydrocarbon indicators (DHIs) and amplitude variation with offset (AVO) can be instrumental in identifying the presence of hydrocarbons. Inversion converts seismic data into acoustic impedance, which can be used to estimate geological properties. This paper reviews the literature and commonly used techniques for seismic amplitude analysis.

,

The acquisition of seismic data is a non-invasive technique used for determining the sub surface geology. Changes in lithology and fluid fill affect the seismic wavelet. Analysing seismic data for direct hydrocarbon indicators (DHIs), such as full stack amplitude anomalies, or amplitude variation with offset (AVO), can help a seismic interpreter relate the geophysical response to real geology and, more importantly, to distinguish the presence of hydrocarbons. Inversion is another commonly used technique that attempts to tie the seismic data back to the geology. Much has been written about these techniques, and attempting to gain an understanding on the theory and application of them by reading through various journals can be quite daunting. The purpose of this paper is to briefly outline DHI analysis, including full stack amplitude anomalies, AVO and inversion and show the relationship between all three. The equations presented have been included for completeness, but the reader can pass over the mathematical detail.

]
© 2014 ASEG
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG13070
2014-09-01
2026-01-23

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1071/EG13070
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aki, K., and Richards, P. G., 1980, Quantitative seismology: theory and methods: W. H. Freeman and Co.
  2. Bortfeld R. 1961 Approximations to the reflection and transmission coefficients of plane longitudinal and transverse waves: Geophysical Prospecting 9 485 502 10.1111/j.1365‑2478.1961.tb01670.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1961.tb01670.x [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown, A., 2004, Interpretation of three-dimensional seismic data: AAPG Memoir42.
  4. Brown, A., 2005, Pitfalls in 3-D seismic interpretation: AAPG 3-D Seismic Symposium, March 2005, Denver.
  5. Carter, D., Mandhiri, D., Park, R. K., Asjhari, I., Syaiful Basyuni, S., Birdus, S., Bradfield, J. P., Iriawan, A., Nasfiah, M., and Nugroho, M. A. A., 2005, Interpretation methods in exploration of Oligocene-Miocene carbonate reservoirs, offshore northwest Madura, Indonesia: Thirtieth Annual IPA Convention & Exhibition, August 2005, Jakarta, 179–215.
  6. Castagna, J. P., and Backus, M. M., 1993, Offset-dependent reflectivity – theory and practice of AVO analysis: SEG
  7. Castagna J. P. Swan H. W. 1997 Principles of AVO crossplotting: The Leading Edge 16 337 344 10.1190/1.1437626
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1437626 [Google Scholar]
  8. Castagna J. P. Batzle M. L. Eastwood R. L. 1985 Relationship between compressional and shear-wave velocities in clastic silicate rocks: Geophysics 50 571 581 10.1190/1.1441933
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441933 [Google Scholar]
  9. Castagna J. P. Swan H. W. Foster D. J. 1998 Framework for AVO gradient and intercept interpretation: Geophysics 63 948 956 10.1190/1.1444406
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444406 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chopra, S., and Marfurt, K., 2007, Seismic attributes for prospect identification and reservoir characterisation: SEG Monogaph 11.
  11. Connolly P. 1999 Elastic impedance: The Leading Edge 18 438 452 10.1190/1.1438307
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1438307 [Google Scholar]
  12. Fatti J. L. Vail P. J. Smith G. C. Strauss P. J. Levitt P. R. 1994 Detection of gas in sandstone reservoirs using AVO analysis: A 3-D seismic case history using the geostack technique: Geophysics 59 1362 1376 10.1190/1.1443695
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443695 [Google Scholar]
  13. Goodway, B., Chen, T., and Downton, J., 1997, Improved AVO fluid detection and lithology discrimination using Lamé petrophysical parameters: ‘λρ’, ‘μρ’ and ‘λ/μ fluid stack’, from P- and S-inversions: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, Dallas, 183–186.
  14. Hampson-Russell, 2009, Hampson Russell strata and AVO workshop - course notes: Hampson Russell Software.
  15. Hilterman, F. J., 2001, Seismic amplitude interpretation: SEG Monograph 4.
  16. Kallweit R. S. Wood L. C. 1982 The limits of resolution of zero-phase wavelets: Geophysics 47 1035 1046 10.1190/1.1441367
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441367 [Google Scholar]
  17. Koefoed O. 1955 On the effect of Poisson’s ratios of rock strata on the reflection coefficients of plane waves: Geophysical Prospecting 3 381 387 10.1111/j.1365‑2478.1955.tb01383.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1955.tb01383.x [Google Scholar]
  18. Kunjan, B. K., 2010, Bahamas – a large unconventional biogenic gas play in the Taranaki Basin – New Zealand: Petromin.
  19. Ostrander W. J. 1984 Plane-wave reflection coefficients for gas sands at non-normal angles of incidence: Geophysics 49 1637 1648 10.1190/1.1441571
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441571 [Google Scholar]
  20. Rutherford S. R. Williams R. H. 1989 Amplitude-versus-offset variations in gas sands: Geophysics 54 680 688 10.1190/1.1442696
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442696 [Google Scholar]
  21. Shuey R. T. 1985 A simplification of the Zoeppritz equations: Geophysics 50 609 614 10.1190/1.1441936
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441936 [Google Scholar]
  22. Smith G. C. Gidlow P. M. 1987 Weighted stacking for rock property estimation and detection of gas: Geophysical Prospecting 35 993 1014 10.1111/j.1365‑2478.1987.tb00856.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1987.tb00856.x [Google Scholar]
  23. Veeken P. C. H. Rauch-Davies M. 2006 AVO attribute analysis and seismic reservoir characterization: First Break 24 41 52
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Whitcombe D. N. Connolly P. A. Reagan R. L. Redshaw T. C. 2002 Extended elastic impedance for fluid and lithology prediction: Geophysics 67 63 67
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Wiggins, R., Kenny, G. S., and McClure, C. D., 1983, A method for determining and displaying the shear-velocity reflectivities of a geologic formation: European Patent Application 0113944.
  26. Zoeppritz K. 1919 Erdbebenwellen viiib on the reflection and propagation of seismic waves: Gottinger Nachrichten 1 66 84
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1071/EG13070
Loading
A description of seismic amplitude techniques
Exploration Geophysics 45, 154 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1071/EG13070
/content/journals/10.1071/EG13070
/content/journals/10.1071/EG13070
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): amplitude variation with offset (AVO), direct hydrocarbon indicators (DHIs), seismic inversion.

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error