1887
Volume 46, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

[

We propose a process to effectively use the modified shortest path method for extracting the maximum amplitude around the first-arrival events. Then, the excitation amplitude imaging condition is applied to obtain a continuous and clear migration image. Numerical tests show that the improvement is feasible and effective in complex-structure media.

,

In wave-equation-based migration, the imaging condition is an important factor that impacts migration accuracy and efficiency. Among the commonly used imaging conditions, the excitation amplitude imaging condition has high resolution, accuracy and low storage and input/output burden when compared with others. However, the excitation amplitude extracted by this imaging condition in its current form will produce a distorted migration image for certain scenarios. In this paper, a modified excitation amplitude imaging condition is proposed that addresses the above problem and produces migrated images free from distortion for complicated geologic models. In this paper, we propose a method to effectively use the modified shortest path method (MSPM) for extracting the maximum amplitude around the first-arrival events. Then, the excitation amplitude imaging condition is applied to obtain a continuous and clear migration image. This process can, to some extent, improve the distorted migration image produced by the traditional excitation amplitude imaging condition. Some numerical tests with synthetic data of Sigsbee2a and Marmousi-II models show that the improvement is feasible and effective in complex-structure media.

]
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG14039
2015-12-01
2026-01-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bai C. Y. Greenhalgh S. Zhou B. 2007 3D ray tracing using a modified shortest-path method: Geophysics 72 T27 T36 10.1190/1.2732549
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2732549 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bai C. Y. Huang G. J. Zhao R. 2010 2-D/3-D irregular shortest-path ray tracing for multiple arrivals and its applications: Geophysical Journal International 183 1596 1612 10.1111/j.1365‑246X.2010.04817.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04817.x [Google Scholar]
  3. Bai C. Y. Li X. L. Tang X. P. 2011 Seismic wavefront evolution of multiply reflected, transmitted, and converted phases in 2D/3D triangular cell model: Journal of Seismology 15 637 652 10.1007/s10950‑011‑9242‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-011-9242-y [Google Scholar]
  4. Baysal E. Kosloff D. Sherwood J. 1983 Reverse time migration: Geophysics 48 1514 1524 10.1190/1.1441434
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441434 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chang W. F. McMechan G. A. 1986 Reverse-time migration of offset vertical seismic profiling data using the excitation-time imaging condition: Geophysics 51 67 84 10.1190/1.1442041
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442041 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chang W. F. McMechan G. A. 1990 3D acoustic prestack reverse-time migration: Geophysical Prospecting 38 737 755 10.1111/j.1365‑2478.1990.tb01872.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1990.tb01872.x [Google Scholar]
  7. Chattopadhyay S. McMechan G. A. 2008 Imaging conditions for prestack reverse-time migration: Geophysics 73 S81 S89 10.1190/1.2903822
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2903822 [Google Scholar]
  8. Clapp, R. G., 2009, Reverse time migration with random boundaries: 79th Annual International Meeting and Exposition, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 2809–2813.
  9. Collino F. Tsogka C. 2001 Application of the perfectly matched absorbing layer model to the linear elastodynamic problem in anisotropic heterogeneous media: Geophysics 66 294 307 10.1190/1.1444908
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444908 [Google Scholar]
  10. Gray S. H. Etgen J. Dellinger J. Whitmore D. 2001 Seismic migration problems and solutions: Geophysics 66 1622 1640 10.1190/1.1487107
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1487107 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hemon C. 1978 Equations D’onde et Modeles: Geophysical Prospecting 26 790 821 10.1111/j.1365‑2478.1978.tb01634.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1978.tb01634.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Kaelin, B., and Guitton, A., 2006, Imaging condition for reverse time migration: 76th Annual International Meeting and Exposition, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 2594–2598.
  13. Liu F. Zhang G. Morton S. A. Leveille J. P. 2011 An effective imaging condition for reverse-time migration using wavefield decomposition: Geophysics 76 S29 S39 10.1190/1.3533914
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3533914 [Google Scholar]
  14. Loewenthal D. Mufti I. R. 1983 Reverse time migration in the spatial frequency domain: Geophysics 48 627 635 10.1190/1.1441493
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441493 [Google Scholar]
  15. Martin, G. S., Marfurt, K. J., and Larsen, S., 2002, Marmousi-2: an updated model for the investigation of AVO in structurally complex areas: 72nd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1979–1982.
  16. McMechan G. A. 1983 Migration by extrapolation of time-dependent boundary values: Geophysical Prospecting 31 413 420 10.1111/j.1365‑2478.1983.tb01060.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1983.tb01060.x [Google Scholar]
  17. Nguyen B. D. McMechan G. A. 2013 Excitation amplitude imaging condition for prestack reverse-time migration: Geophysics 78 S37 S46 10.1190/geo2012‑0079.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2012-0079.1 [Google Scholar]
  18. Nichols D. E. 1996 Maximum energy traveltimes calculated in the seismic frequency band: Geophysics 61 253 263 10.1190/1.1443946
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443946 [Google Scholar]
  19. O’Brien M. Gray S. 1996 Can we image beneath salt?: The Leading Edge 15 17 22 10.1190/1.1437194
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1437194 [Google Scholar]
  20. Paffenholz, J., Mclain, B., Zaske, J., and Keliher, P., 2002, Subsalt multiple attenuation and imaging: observations from the Sigsbee2B synthetic data set: 72nd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 2122–2125.
  21. Ravasi M. Curtis A. 2013 Nonlinear scattering based imaging in elastic media: theory, theorems, and imaging conditions: Geophysics 78 S137 S155 10.1190/geo2012‑0286.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2012-0286.1 [Google Scholar]
  22. Shin, S., Shin, C., and Kim, W., 2000, Traveltime calculation using monochromatic one way wave equation: 70th Annual International Meeting and Exposition, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 2313–2316.
  23. Shin C. Min D. Marfurt K. Lim H. Yang D. Cha Y. Ko S. Yoon K. Ha T. Hong S. 2002 Traveltime and amplitude calculations using the damped wave solution: Geophysics 67 1637 1647 10.1190/1.1512811
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1512811 [Google Scholar]
  24. Shin C. Ko S. Marfurt K. Yang D. 2003 Wave equation calculation of most energetic traveltimes and amplitudes for Kirchhoff prestack migration: Geophysics 68 2040 2042 10.1190/1.1635057
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1635057 [Google Scholar]
  25. Symes W. M. 2007 Reverse time migration with optimal checkpointing: Geophysics 72 SM213 SM221 10.1190/1.2742686
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2742686 [Google Scholar]
  26. Vidale J. 1988 Finite-difference calculation of travel times: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 78 2062 2076
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Whitmore, N. D., 1983, Iterative depth migration by backward time propagation: 53th Annual International Meeting and Exposition, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 382–385.
  28. Yan J. Sava P. 2008 Isotropic angle-domain elastic reverse-time migration: Geophysics 73 S229 S239 10.1190/1.2981241
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2981241 [Google Scholar]
  29. Yan R. Xie X. B. 2012 An angle-domain imaging condition for elastic reverse time migration and its application to angle gather extraction: Geophysics 77 S105 S115 10.1190/geo2011‑0455.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011-0455.1 [Google Scholar]
  30. Yoon K. Marfurt K. J. 2006 Reverse-time migration using the Poynting vector: Exploration Geophysics 37 102 107 10.1071/EG06102
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG06102 [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhou B. Greenhalgh S. A. 2005 ‘Shortest path’ ray tracing for most general 2D/3D anisotropic media: Journal of Geophysics and Engineering 2 54 63 10.1088/1742‑2132/2/1/008
    https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/2/1/008 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1071/EG14039
Loading
/content/journals/10.1071/EG14039
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error