1887
Volume 47, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

[

Seismic inverse problems aim to infer the properties of subsurface geology, such as elastic and petrophysical properties. Existing seismic inversion methods for the joint estimation of these properties are mainly based either on Gassmann theory for prestack seismic data processed with stochastic optimisation techniques or on the Wyllie formula for poststack seismic data processed by deterministic optimisation techniques. The purpose of this study is to develop a strategy for the joint estimation of elastic and petrophysical properties from prestack seismic data based on Gassmann equations with deterministic optimisation techniques. Given poor-quality prestack seismic data, two regularisation parameters are introduced to control the trade-off between fidelity to the data and the smoothness of the solution. An appropriate linearised system of equations for the joint model update is derived from Newton’s method, which fits seismic data, the description of the rock physics medium and prior information, simultaneously. We show the preliminary results obtained with the proposed framework for synthetic and real data examples.

,

We present a strategy for the joint estimation of elastic and petrophysical properties from prestack seismic data based on Gassmann equations with deterministic optimisation techniques. Given poor-quality prestack seismic data, two regularisation parameters are introduced to control the trade-off between fidelity to the data and the smoothness of the solution.

]
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG14074
2016-12-01
2026-01-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aki, K., and Richards, P. G., 1980, Quantitative seismology: theory and methods: Freeman.
  2. Asnaashari A. Brossier R. Garambois S. Audebert F. Thore P. Virieux J. 2013 Regularized seismic full waveform inversion with prior model information: Geophysics 78 R25 R36 10.1190/geo2012‑0104.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2012-0104.1 [Google Scholar]
  3. Avseth P. Mukerji T. Jørstad A. Mavko G. Veggeland T. 2001 Seismic reservoir mapping from 3-D AVO in a North Sea turbidite system: Geophysics 66 1157 1176 10.1190/1.1487063
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1487063 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bachrach R. 2006 Joint estimation of porosity and saturation using stochastic rock-physics modeling: Geophysics 71 O53 O63 10.1190/1.2235991
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2235991 [Google Scholar]
  5. Biot M. A. 1962 Generalized theory of acoustic propagation in porous dissipative media: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 34 1254 1264 10.1121/1.1918315
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1918315 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bosch M. 2004 The optimization approach to lithological tomography: combining seismic data and petrophysics for porosity prediction: Geophysics 69 1272 1282 10.1190/1.1801944
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1801944 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bosch M. Cara L. Rodrigues J. Navarro A. Díaz M. 2007 A Monte Carlo approach to the joint estimation of reservoir and elastic parameters from seismic amplitudes: Geophysics 72 O29 O39 10.1190/1.2783766
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2783766 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bosch M. Carvajal C. Rodrigues J. Torres A. Aldana M. Sierra J. 2009 Petrophysical seismic inversion conditioned to well-log data: methods and application to a gas reservoir: Geophysics 74 O1 O15 10.1190/1.3043796
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3043796 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bosch M. Mukerji T. Gonzalez E. F. 2010 Seismic inversion for reservoir properties combining statistical rock physics and geostatistics: a review: Geophysics 75 75A165 75A176 10.1190/1.3478209
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3478209 [Google Scholar]
  10. Buland A. Kolbjørnsen O. Hauge R. Skjæveland Ø. Duffaut K. 2008 Bayesian lithology and fluid prediction from seismic prestack data: Geophysics 73 C13 C21 10.1190/1.2842150
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2842150 [Google Scholar]
  11. Eidsvik J. Avseth P. Omre H. Mukerji T. Mavko G. 2004 Stochastic reservoir characterization using prestack seismic data: Geophysics 69 978 993 10.1190/1.1778241
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1778241 [Google Scholar]
  12. Gassmann F. 1951 Elastic waves through a packing of spheres: Geophysics 16 673 685 10.1190/1.1437718
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1437718 [Google Scholar]
  13. González E. F. Mukerji T. Mavko G. 2008 Seismic inversion combining rock physics and multiple-point geostatistics: Geophysics 73 R11 R21 10.1190/1.2803748
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2803748 [Google Scholar]
  14. Grana D. Della Rossa E. 2010 Probabilistic petrophysical-properties estimation integrating statistical rock physics with seismic inversion: Geophysics 75 O21 O37 10.1190/1.3386676
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3386676 [Google Scholar]
  15. Grana, D., Rossa, E. D., and D’Agosto, C., 2009, Petrophysical properties estimation in a crosswell study integrated with statistical rock physics: 2009 SEG Annual Meeting, 25–30 October, Houston, Texas, 1805–1809.
  16. Grana D. Mukerji T. Dvorkin J. Mavko G. 2012 Stochastic inversion of facies from seismic data based on sequential simulations and probability perturbation method: Geophysics 77 M53 M72 10.1190/geo2011‑0417.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011-0417.1 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gunning J. Glinsky M. E. 2007 Detection of reservoir quality using Bayesian seismic inversion: Geophysics 72 R37 R49 10.1190/1.2713043
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2713043 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hill R. 1952 The elastic behaviour of a crystalline aggregate: Proceedings of the Physical Society, Section A 65 349 354 10.1088/0370‑1298/65/5/307
    https://doi.org/10.1088/0370-1298/65/5/307 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kjønsberg H. Hauge R. Kolbjørnsen O. Buland A. 2010 Bayesian Monte Carlo method for seismic predrill prospect assessment: Geophysics 75 O9 O19 10.1190/1.3339678
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3339678 [Google Scholar]
  20. Larsen A. L. Ulvmoen M. Omre H. Buland A. 2006 Bayesian lithology/fluid prediction and simulation on the basis of a Markov-chain prior model: Geophysics 71 R69 R78 10.1190/1.2245469
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2245469 [Google Scholar]
  21. Mukerji T. Jørstad A. Avseth P. Mavko G. Granli J. R. 2001 Mapping lithofacies and pore-fluid probabilities in a North Sea reservoir: seismic inversions and statistical rock physics: Geophysics 66 988 1001 10.1190/1.1487078
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1487078 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ostrander W. 1984 Plane-wave reflection coefficients for gas sands at nonnormal angles of incidence: Geophysics 49 1637 1648 10.1190/1.1441571
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441571 [Google Scholar]
  23. Reuss A. 1929 Berechnung der Fließgrenze von Mischkristallen auf Grund der Plastizitätsbedingung für Einkristalle: Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics 9 49 58
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Rimstad K. Omre H. 2010 Impact of rock-physics depth trends and Markov random fields on hierarchical Bayesian lithology/fluid prediction: Geophysics 75 R93 R108 10.1190/1.3463475
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3463475 [Google Scholar]
  25. Saltzer R. Finn C. Burtz O. 2005 Predicting VShale and porosity using cascaded seismic and rock physics inversion: The Leading Edge 24 732 736 10.1190/1.1993269
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1993269 [Google Scholar]
  26. Sauvageau M. Gloaguen E. Claprood M. Lefebvre R. Bêche M. 2014 Multimodal reservoir porosity simulation: an application to a tight oil reservoir: Journal of Applied Geophysics 107 71 79 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.05.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.05.007 [Google Scholar]
  27. Ulvmoen M. Omre H. 2010 Improved resolution in Bayesian lithology/fluid inversion from prestack seismic data and well observations: Part 1—Methodology: Geophysics 75 R21 R35 10.1190/1.3294570
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3294570 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1071/EG14074
Loading
/content/journals/10.1071/EG14074
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error