1887
Volume 47, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

[

We present an inversion tool for airborne gravity gradient data that yields a 3D density model using stochastic methods i.e. cokriging and conditional simulation. This method uses geostatistical properties of the measured gravity gradient to estimate a 3D density model whose gravity response fits the measured gravity gradient anomaly. Linearity between gravity gradient data and density allows estimation of the model (density) covariance using observed data, i.e. we adjust iteratively the density covariance matrix by fitting experimental and theoretical gravity gradient covariance matrices. Inversion can be constrained by including densities known at some locations. In addition we can explore various reasonable solutions that honour both the estimated density covariance model and the gravity gradient data using geostatistical simulation.

The proposed method is first tested with two synthetic datasets generated from a sharp-boundary model and a smooth stochastic model respectively. The results show the method to be capable of retrieving models compatible with the true models; it also allows the integration of complex information. The technique is then applied to gravity gradient survey data collected for the Geological Survey of Canada in the area of McFaulds Lake (Ontario, Canada) using the Falcon airborne gravity system. Unconstrained inversion returns a density model that is geologically plausible and the computed response exactly fits the observed gravity gradient anomaly.

,

This article presents an inversion tool for airborne gravity gradient data that yields a 3D density model using stochastic methods i.e. cokriging and conditional simulation. This method uses geostatistical properties of the measured gravity gradient to estimate a 3D density model. Applications to modelled and survey data demonstrate the performance of the method.

]
ASEG
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG14084
2016-03-01
2026-01-22

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1071/EG14084
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Asli, M., Marcotte, D., and Chouteau, M., 2000, Direct inversion of gravity data by cokriging, in W. J. Kleingeld, and D. G. Krige, eds., Proceedings of the 6th International Geostatistics Congress – Geostat 2000: Geostatistical Association of South Africa, 64–73.
  2. Blakely, R. J., 1995, Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Boggs, D. B., and Dransfield, M. H., 2004, Analysis of errors in gravity derived from the Falcon airborne gravity gradiometer, in R. J. L. Lane, ed., Airborne Gravity 2004 – Abstracts from the ASEG-PESA Airborne Gravity 2004 Workshop: Geoscience Australia Record 2004/18, 135–141.
  4. Bosch M Meza R Jiménez R Hönig A 2006 Joint gravity and magnetic inversion in 3D using Monte Carlo methods: Geophysics 71 G153 G156 10.1190/1.2209952
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2209952 [Google Scholar]
  5. Boulanger O. Chouteau M. 2001 Constraints in 3D gravity inversion: Geophysical Prospecting 49 265 280 10.1046/j.1365‑2478.2001.00254.x
    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00254.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Camacho A. G. Montesinos F. G. Vieira R. 2000 Gravity inversion by means of growing bodies: Geophysics 65 95 101 10.1190/1.1444729
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444729 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chasseriau P. Chouteau M. 2003 3D gravity inversion using a model of parameter covariance: Journal of Applied Geophysics 52 59 74 10.1016/S0926‑9851(02)00240‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(02)00240-9 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen J. Macnae J. C. 1997 Terrain corrections are critical for airborne gravity gradiometer data: Exploration Geophysics 28 21 25 10.1071/EG997021
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG997021 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen J. B. Liu G. F. Liu H. 2012 Seismic imaging based on spectral differentiation matrix and GPU implementation: Journal of Applied Geophysics 79 1 5 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.01.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chilès, J. P., and Delfiner, P., 1999, Geostatistics: modeling spatial uncertainty: John Wiley and Sons.
  11. Condi, F., and Talwani, M., 1999, Resolution and efficient inversion of gravity gradiometry: 69th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 18, 358–361.
  12. Cox, L., and Zhdanov, M., 2007, Large-scale 3D inversion of HEM data using a moving footprint: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2007, 467–471.
  13. Davis K. Kass M. A. Li Y. 2011 Rapid gravity and gravity gradiometry terrain corrections via an adaptive quadtree mesh discretization: Exploration Geophysics 42 88 97 10.1071/EG10016
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG10016 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dransfield M. Zeng Y. 2009 Airborne gravity gradiometry: terrain corrections and elevation error: Geophysics 74 I37 I42 10.1190/1.3170688
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3170688 [Google Scholar]
  15. Forsberg, R., 1984, A study of terrain reductions, density anomalies and geophysical inversion methods in gravity field modeling: Report no. 355, Department of Geodesic Science and Survey, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 129 pp.
  16. Franklin J. 1970 Well-posed stochastic extensions of ill posed linear problems: Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 31 682 716
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gabell, A., Tuckett, H., and Olson, D., 2004, The GT-1A mobile gravimeter, in R. J. L. Lane, ed., Airborne Gravity 2004 – Abstracts from the ASEG-PESA Airborne Gravity 2004 Workshop: Geoscience Australia Record 2004/18, 55–61.
  18. Gloaguen E. Marcotte D. Chouteau M. Perroud H. 2005 Borehole radar velocity inversion using cokriging and cosimulation: Journal of Applied Geophysics 57 242 259 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2005.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2005.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hammond S. Murphy C. A. 2003 Air-FTG™: Bell Geospace’s gravity gradiometer – a description and case study: Preview 105 24 26
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hansen T. Journel A. Tarantola A. Mosegaard K. 2006 Linear inverse Gaussian theory and geostatistics: Geophysics 71 R101 R111 10.1190/1.2345195
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2345195 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kass M. A. Li Y. 2008 Practical aspects of terrain correction in airborne gravity gradiometry surveys: Exploration Geophysics 39 198 203 10.1071/EG08021
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG08021 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kirkendall B. Li Y. Oldenburg D. 2007 Imaging cargo containers using gravity gradiometry: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 45 1786 1797 10.1109/TGRS.2007.895427
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2007.895427 [Google Scholar]
  23. Le Ravalec M. Noetinger B. Hu L. 2000 The FFT moving average (FFT-MA) generator: an efficient numerical method for generating and conditioning Gaussian simulations: Mathematical Geology 32 701 723 10.1023/A:1007542406333
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007542406333 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lee J. B. 2001 FALCON gravity gradiometer technology: Exploration Geophysics 32 247 250 10.1071/EG01247
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG01247 [Google Scholar]
  25. Lee, J., Li, Y., and Lane, R., 2005, Effects of data filtering on inversion of gravity gradient data: 75th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 24, 627–631.
  26. Li, Y., 2001, 3-D inversion of gravity gradiometer data: 71st Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1470–1473.
  27. Li X. Chouteau M. 1998 Three-dimensional gravity modeling in all space: Surveys in Geophysics 19 339 368 10.1023/A:1006554408567
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006554408567 [Google Scholar]
  28. Li Y. Oldenburg D. 1998 3-D inversion of gravity data: Geophysics 63 109 119 10.1190/1.1444302
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444302 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lukaschewitsch M. Maass P. Pidcock M. 2003 Tikhonov regularization for electrical impedance tomography on unbounded domains: Inverse Problems 19 585 610 10.1088/0266‑5611/19/3/308
    https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/19/3/308 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lyrio, J. C. S., 2009, Processing and inversion of full tensor gravity gradiometry data: Ph.D. thesis, Colorado School of Mines.
  31. Martinez, C. Y., Li, Y., Krahenbuhl, R., and Braga, M., 2010, 3D inversion of airborne gravity gradiometry for iron ore exploration in Brazil: 80thAnnual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1753–1757.
  32. Menke, W., 1989, Geophysical data analysis: discrete inverse theory: Academic Press.
  33. Metsaranta, R. T., and Houlé, M. G., 2011, McFaulds Lake area regional compilation and bedrock mapping project update, in Summary of Field Work and Other Activities 2011: Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 6270, 12-1–12-12.
  34. Nowak W Tenkleve S Cirpka O. A. 2003 Efficient computation of linearized cross-covariance and auto-covariance matrices of interdependent quantities: Mathematical Geology 35 53 66
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Pilkington M. 2012 Analysis of gravity gradiometer inverse problems using optimal design measures: Geophysics 77 G25 G31 10.1190/geo2011‑0317.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011-0317.1 [Google Scholar]
  36. Rainsford, D., Houlé, M. G., Metsaranta, R., Keating, P., and Pilkington, M., 2011, An overview of the McFaulds Lake airborne gravity gradiometer and magnetic survey, Northwestern Ontario, in Summary of Field Work and Other Activities 2011: Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 6270, 39-1–39-8.
  37. Rene R. M. 1986 Gravity inversion using open, reject, and ‘shape-of-anomaly’ fill criteria: Geophysics 51 988 994 10.1190/1.1442157
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442157 [Google Scholar]
  38. Sander, S., Argyle, M., Elieff, S., Ferguson, S., Lavoie, V., and Sander, L., 2004, The AIRGrav airborne gravity system, in R. J. L. Lane, ed., Airborne Gravity 2004 - Abstracts from the ASEG-PESA Airborne Gravity 2004 Workshop: Geoscience Australia Record 2004/18, 49–54.
  39. Shamsipour P. Marcotte D. Chouteau M. Keating P. 2010 a 3D stochastic inversion of gravity data using cokriging and cosimulation: Geophysics 75 I1 I10 10.1190/1.3295745
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3295745 [Google Scholar]
  40. Shamsipour, P., Chouteau, M., and Marcotte, D., 2010b, 3D stochastic inversion of borehole and surface gravity data using geostatistics: EGM 2010 International Workshop, 12–14 April, Capri, Italy.
  41. Shamsipour P. Chouteau M. Marcotte D. 2011 3D stochastic inversion of magnetic data: Journal of Applied Geophysics 73 336 347 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.02.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.02.005 [Google Scholar]
  42. Shamsipour P. Marcotte D. Chouteau M. 2012 3D stochastic joint inversion of gravity and magnetic data: Journal of Applied Geophysics 79 27 37 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.12.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.12.012 [Google Scholar]
  43. Shamsipour P. Marcotte D. Chouteau M. Rivest M. Bouchedda A. 2013 3D stochastic gravity inversion using non-stationary covariances: Geophysics 78 G15 G24 10.1190/geo2012‑0122.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2012-0122.1 [Google Scholar]
  44. Stott, G. M., Josey, S. D., Rainsford, D. R. B., and McIlraith, S. J., 2008, Precambrian geology and aeromagnetic data of the Hudson Bay and James Bay Lowlands Region with Precambrian basement depth estimates and related tables of geochronology and diamond-drill hole data: Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Release Data 233.
  45. Tarantola A. Valette B. 1982 Generalized nonlinear inverse problems solved using the least squares criterion: Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics 20 219 232 10.1029/RG020i002p00219
    https://doi.org/10.1029/RG020i002p00219 [Google Scholar]
  46. Tchikaya, E., Chouteau, M., Keating, P., and Shamsipour, P., 2013, 3D inversion of airborne gravity gradient data using stochastic methods: 13th Biennal SAGA Meeting, 6–9 October 2013, Kruger Park, South Africa.
  47. Thomson, S., Fountain, D., and Watts, T., 2007, Airborne geophysics – evolution and revolution, in B. Milkereit, ed., Proceedings of Exploration 07: Fifth Decennial International Conference on Mineral Exploration, 19–37.
  48. Uieda, L., and Barbosa, V. C. F., 2011, Robust 3D gravity gradient inversion by planting anomalous densities: 81st Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 820–824.
  49. van Kann, F., 2004, Requirements and general principles of airborne gravity gradiometers for mineral exploration, in R. J. L. Lane, ed., Airborne Gravity 2004 – Abstracts from the ASEG-PESA Airborne Gravity 2004 Workshop: Geoscience Australia Record 2004/18, 1–5.
  50. van Leeuwen E. H. 2000 BHP develops airborne gravity gradiometer for mineral exploration: The Leading Edge 19 1296 1297 10.1190/1.1438526
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1438526 [Google Scholar]
  51. Vasco D. W. Taylor C. 1991 Inversion of airborne gravity gradient data, southwestern Oklahoma: Geophysics 56 90 101 10.1190/1.1442961
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442961 [Google Scholar]
  52. Witherly, K., 2005, New developments in airborne geophysics enhancing discovery effectiveness: The Ontario Prospector, Vol. 10, Issue 1.
  53. Zhdanov M. S. Ellis R. Mukherjee S. 2004 Three-dimensional regularized focusing inversion of gravity gradient tensor component data: Geophysics 69 925 937 10.1190/1.1778236
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1778236 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1071/EG14084
Loading
3D unconstrained and geologically constrained stochastic inversion of airborne vertical gravity gradient data
Exploration Geophysics 47, 67 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1071/EG14084
/content/journals/10.1071/EG14084
/content/journals/10.1071/EG14084
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): 3D modelling; cokriging; cosimulation; gradient gravity; inversion

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error