6th International Conference in Airborne Electromagnetics (AEM 2013)

References

1. Chen T. Hodges G. Miles P. 2015 MULTIPULSE – high resolution and high power in one TDEM system: Exploration Geophysics 46 49 57 10.1071/EG14027
   https://doi.org/10.1071/EG14027 [Google Scholar]
2. Combrinck M. 2015 Developing an efficient modelling and data presentation strategy for ATDEM system comparison and survey design: Exploration Geophysics 46 3 11 10.1071/EG14026
   https://doi.org/10.1071/EG14026 [Google Scholar]
3. Fullagar P. K. Pears G. A. Reid J. E. Schaa R. 2015 Rapid approximate inversion of airborne TEM: Exploration Geophysics 46 112 117 10.1071/EG14046
   https://doi.org/10.1071/EG14046 [Google Scholar]
4. Guillemoteau J. Sailhac P. Behaegel M. 2015 Modelling an arbitrarily oriented magnetic dipole over a homogeneous half-space for a rapid topographic correction of airborne EM data: Exploration Geophysics 46 85 96 10.1071/EG13093
   https://doi.org/10.1071/EG13093 [Google Scholar]
5. Hodges G. Chen T. 2015 Geobandwidth: comparing time domain electromagnetic waveforms with a wire loop model: Exploration Geophysics 46 58 63 10.1071/EG14032
   https://doi.org/10.1071/EG14032 [Google Scholar]
6. Legault J. M. Izarra C. Prikhodko A. Zhao S. Saadawi E. M. 2015 Helicopter EM (ZTEM–VTEM) survey results over the Nuqrah copper–lead–zinc–gold SEDEX massive sulphide deposit in the Western Arabian Shield, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Exploration Geophysics 46 36 48 10.1071/EG14028
   https://doi.org/10.1071/EG14028 [Google Scholar]
7. Leggatt P. B. 2015 Extending the range of time constants recorded by the SPECTREM AEM system: Exploration Geophysics 46 136 139 10.1071/EG14029
   https://doi.org/10.1071/EG14029 [Google Scholar]
8. Ley-Cooper A. Y. Viezzoli A. Guillemoteau J. Vignoli G. Macnae J. Cox L. Munday T. 2015 Airborne electromagnetic modelling options and their consequences in target definition: Exploration Geophysics 46 74 84 10.1071/EG14045
   https://doi.org/10.1071/EG14045 [Google Scholar]
9. Macnae J. 2015 3D-spectral CDIs: a fast alternative to 3D inversion?: Exploration Geophysics 46 12 18 10.1071/EG14036
   https://doi.org/10.1071/EG14036 [Google Scholar]
10. Peters G. Street G. Kahimise I. Hutchins D. 2015 Regional TEMPEST survey in north-east Namibia: Exploration Geophysics 46 27 35 10.1071/EG14022
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG14022 [Google Scholar]
11. Pfaffhuber A. A. Hendricks S. 2015 Not extinct yet: innovations in frequency domain HEM triggered by sea ice studies: Exploration Geophysics 46 64 73 10.1071/EG14034
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG14034 [Google Scholar]
12. Sattel D. Mutton P. 2015 Modelling the superparamagnetic response of AEM data: Exploration Geophysics 46 118 129 10.1071/EG14005
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG14005 [Google Scholar]
13. Sattel D. Witherly K. 2015 The analysis of ZTEM data across the Humble magnetic anomaly, Alaska: Exploration Geophysics 46 19 26 10.1071/EG14006
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG14006 [Google Scholar]
14. Smiarowski A. 2015 Using the in-line component for fixed-wing EM 1D inversion: Exploration Geophysics 46 130 135 10.1071/EG14024
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG14024 [Google Scholar]
15. Vallée M. A. 2015 New developments in AEM discrete conductor modelling and inversion: Exploration Geophysics 46 97 111 10.1071/EG14025
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG14025 [Google Scholar]