1887
Volume 47, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

[

We present a hybrid inversion scheme for airborne TEM data that introduces approximation only in the calculation of partial derivatives. The objective function is evaluated with a full nonlinear one-dimensional (1D) forward model.

,

Airborne transient electromagnetic (TEM) methods target a range of applications that all rely on analysis of extremely large datasets, but with widely varying requirements with regard to accuracy and computing time. Certain applications have larger intrinsic tolerances with regard to modelling inaccuracy, and there can be varying degrees of tolerance throughout different phases of interpretation. It is thus desirable to be able to tune a custom balance between accuracy and compute time when modelling of airborne datasets. This balance, however, is not necessarily easy to obtain in practice. Typically, a significant reduction in computational time can only be obtained by moving to a much simpler physical description of the system, e.g. by employing a simpler forward model. This will often lead to a significant loss of accuracy, without an indication of computational precision.

We demonstrate a tuneable method for significantly speeding up inversion of airborne TEM data with little to no loss of modelling accuracy. Our approach introduces an approximation only in the calculation of the partial derivatives used for minimising the objective function, rather than in the evaluation of the objective function itself. This methodological difference is important, as it introduces no further approximation in the physical description of the system, but only in the process of iteratively guiding the inversion algorithm towards the solution. By means of a synthetic study, we demonstrate how our new hybrid approach provides inversion speed-up factors ranging from ~3 to 7, depending on the degree of approximation. We conclude that the results are near identical in both model and data space. A field case confirms the conclusions from the synthetic examples: that there is very little difference between the full nonlinear solution and the hybrid versions, whereas an inversion with approximate derivatives and an approximate forward mapping differs significantly from the other results.

]
ASEG
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG14121
2016-12-01
2026-01-18

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1071/EG14121
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allard, M., 2007, On the origin of the HTEM species, in B. Milkereit, ed., Proceedings of Exploration 07: Fifth Decennial International Conference on Mineral Exploration: Decennial Mineral Exploration Conferences, 355–374.
  2. Auken E. Christiansen A. V. 2004 Layered and laterally constrained 2D inversion of resistivity data: Geophysics 69 752 761 10.1190/1.1759461
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1759461 [Google Scholar]
  3. Auken E. Christiansen A. V. Jacobsen L. Sørensen K. I. 2008 A resolution study of buried valleys using laterally constrained inversion of TEM data: Journal of Applied Geophysics 65 10 20 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.03.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.03.003 [Google Scholar]
  4. Auken E. Christiansen A. V. Kirkegaard C. Fiandaca G. Schamper C. Behroozmand A. A. Binley A. Nielsen E. Effersø F. Christensen N. B. Sørensen K. I. Foged N. Vignoli G. 2014 An overview of a highly versatile forward and stable inverse algorithm for airborne, ground-based and borehole electromagnetic and electric data: Exploration Geophysics 10.1071/EG13097
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG13097 [Google Scholar]
  5. Broyden C. G. 1965 A class of methods for solving nonlinear simultaneous equations: Mathematics of Computation 19 577 593 10.1090/S0025‑5718‑1965‑0198670‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-1965-0198670-6 [Google Scholar]
  6. Christensen N. B. 1997 Electromagnetic subsurface imaging. A case for adaptive Born approximation: Surveys in Geophysics 18 477 510 10.1023/A:1006593408478
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006593408478 [Google Scholar]
  7. Christensen N. B. Reid J. E. Halkjaer M. 2009 Fast, laterally smooth inversion of airborne time-domain electromagnetic data: Near Surface Geophysics 7 599 612 10.3997/1873‑0604.2009047
    https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2009047 [Google Scholar]
  8. Christiansen A. V. Auken E. 2004 Optimizing a layered and laterally constrained 2D inversion of resistivity data using Broyden’s update and 1D derivatives: Journal of Applied Geophysics 56 247 261 10.1016/S0926‑9851(04)00055‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(04)00055-2 [Google Scholar]
  9. Christiansen A. V. Auken E. 2012 A global measure for depth of investigation: Geophysics 77 WB171 WB177 10.1190/geo2011‑0393.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011-0393.1 [Google Scholar]
  10. Christiansen A. V. Auken E. Viezzoli A. 2011 Quantification of modeling errors in airborne TEM caused by inaccurate system description: Geophysics 76 F43 F52 10.1190/1.3511354
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3511354 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cox L. H. Wilson G. A. Zhdanov M. S. 2010 3D inversion of airborne electromagnetic data using a moving footprint: Exploration Geophysics 41 250 259 10.1071/EG10003
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG10003 [Google Scholar]
  12. Haber E. Ascher U. M. Oldenburg D. 2000 On optimization techniques for solving nonlinear inverse problems: Inverse Problems 16 1263 1280 10.1088/0266‑5611/16/5/309
    https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/16/5/309 [Google Scholar]
  13. Harbo, M. S., Pedersen, J., Johnsen, R., and Petersen, K., eds., 2011, Groundwater in a future climate: Danish Ministry of the Environment Nature Agency.
  14. Hestenes M. R. Stiefel E. 1952 Methods of conjugate gradients for solving linear systems: Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards 49 409 436 10.6028/jres.049.044
    https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.049.044 [Google Scholar]
  15. Huang H. Fraser D. C. 1996 The differential parameter method for multifrequency airborne resistivity mapping: Geophysics 61 100 109 10.1190/1.1574674
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1574674 [Google Scholar]
  16. Huang H. Palacky G. J. 1991 Damped least-squares inversion of time-domain airborne EM data based on singular value decomposition: Geophysical Prospecting 39 827 844 10.1111/j.1365‑2478.1991.tb00346.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1991.tb00346.x [Google Scholar]
  17. Jørgensen F. Scheer W. Thomsen S. Sonnenborg T. O. Hinsby K. Wiederhold H. Schamper C. Roth B. Kirsch R. Auken E. 2012 Transboundary geophysical mapping of geological elements and salinity distribution critical for the assessment of future sea water intrusion in response to sea level rise: Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 16 1845 1862 10.5194/hess‑16‑1845‑2012
    https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1845-2012 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kirkegaard C. Auken E. 2015 A parallel, scalable and memory efficient inversion code for very large scale airborne EM surveys: Geophysical Prospecting 63 495 507 10.1111/1365‑2478.12200
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12200 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kirkegaard C. Sonnenborg T. O. Auken E. Flemming J. 2011 Salinity distribution in heterogeneous coastal aquifers mapped by airborne electromagnetics: Vadose Zone Journal 10 125 135 10.2136/vzj2010.0038
    https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2010.0038 [Google Scholar]
  20. Kirkegaard C. Foged N. Auken E. Christiansen A. V. Sørensen K. I. 2012 On the value of including x-component data in 1D modeling of electromagnetic data from helicopterborne time domain systems in horizontally layered environments: Journal of Applied Geophysics 84 61 69 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.06.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.06.006 [Google Scholar]
  21. Legault, J. M., Witter, J. B., Berardelli, P., Lombardo, S., and Orta, M., 2011, Recent ZTEM airborne AFMAG EM survey results over Reese River and other geothermal test areas: Geothermal Resources Council 2011 Annual Meeting, 23–26 October 2011, San Diego, California, 35, 879–884.
  22. Ley-Cooper A. Y. Viezzoli A. Guillemoteau J. Vignoli G. Macnae J. Cox L. Munday T. 2015 Airborne electromagnetic modelling options and their consequences in target definition: Exploration Geophysics 46 74 84 10.1071/EG14045
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG14045 [Google Scholar]
  23. Loke M. H. Barker R. D. 1996 Rapid least squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method: Geophysical Prospecting 44 131 152 10.1111/j.1365‑2478.1996.tb00142.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1996.tb00142.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Macnae J. King A. Stolz N. Osmakoff A. Blaha A. 1998 Fast AEM data processing and inversion: Exploration Geophysics 29 163 169 10.1071/EG998163
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG998163 [Google Scholar]
  25. Marquardt D. 1963 An algorithm for least squares estimation of nonlinear parameters: SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 11 431 441 10.1137/0111030
    https://doi.org/10.1137/0111030 [Google Scholar]
  26. Minsley, B., Cox, L. H., Brodie, R., Wilson, G. A., Abraham, J. D., and Zhdanov, M. S., 2012, A comparison of AEM inversion methods for discontinuous permafrost at Fort Yukon, Alaska: Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Environmental and Engineering Problems, SAGEEP, Tuscon, Arizona.
  27. Oldenburg D. W. Ellis R. G. 1991 Inversion of geophysical data using an approximate inverse mapping: Geophysical Journal International 105 325 353 10.1111/j.1365‑246X.1991.tb06717.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1991.tb06717.x [Google Scholar]
  28. Pfaffhuber A. A. Monstad S. Rudd J. 2009 Airborne electromagnetic hydrocarbon mapping in Mozambique: Exploration Geophysics 40 237 245 10.1071/EG09011
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG09011 [Google Scholar]
  29. Plessix R. E. 2006 A review of the adjoint-state method for computing the gradient of a functional with geophysical applications: Geophysical Journal International 167 495 503 10.1111/j.1365‑246X.2006.02978.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02978.x [Google Scholar]
  30. Romdhane A. Grandjean G. Brossier R. M. Rejiba F. Operto S. Vineux J. 2011 Shallow structure characterization by 2D elastic full-waveform inversion: Geophysics 76 R81 R93 10.1190/1.3569798
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3569798 [Google Scholar]
  31. Sengpiel K. P. Siemon B. 2000 Advanced inversion methods for airborne electromagnetic exploration: Geophysics 65 1983 1992 10.1190/1.1444882
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444882 [Google Scholar]
  32. Siemon B Christiansen A. V. Auken E 2009 A review of helicopter-borne electromagnetic methods for groundwater exploration: Near Surface Geophysics 7 629 646
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Sørensen K. I. Auken E. 2004 SkyTEM – a new high-resolution helicopter transient electromagnetic system: Exploration Geophysics 35 191 199
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Torres-Verdín C. Druskin V. L. Fang S. Knizhnerman L. A. Malinverno A. 2000 A dual-grid nonlinear inversion technique with applications to the interpretation of dc resistivity data: Geophysics 65 1733 1745 10.1190/1.1444858
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444858 [Google Scholar]
  35. Viezzoli A. Christiansen A. V. Auken E. Sørensen K. I. 2008 Quasi-3D modeling of airborne TEM data by spatially constrained inversion: Geophysics 73 F105 F113 10.1190/1.2895521
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2895521 [Google Scholar]
  36. Viezzoli A. Munday T. Auken E. Christiansen A. V. 2010 Accurate quasi 3D versus practical full 3D inversion of AEM data – the Bookpurnong case study: Preview 149 23 31
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Ward, S. H., and Hohmann, G. W., 1988, Electromagnetic theory for geophysical applications, in M. N. Nabighian, ed., Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics: Society of Exploration Geophysicists (SEG), 131–311.
  38. Wilson G. A. Raiche A. Sugeng F. 2006 2.5D inversion of airborne electromagnetic data: Exploration Geophysics 37 363 371
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhdanov, M. S., 2002, Geophysical inverse theory and regularization problems: Elsevier.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG14121
Loading
An efficient hybrid scheme for fast and accurate inversion of airborne transient electromagnetic data
Exploration Geophysics 47, 323 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1071/EG14121
/content/journals/10.1071/EG14121
/content/journals/10.1071/EG14121
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): AEM, approximate Jacobian, hybrid minimisation, large dataset inversion.

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error