1887
Volume 48, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

[

Gravity gradiometry has a long legacy, with airborne/marine applications as well as surface applications receiving renewed recent interest. Recent instrumental advances has led to the emergence of downhole gravity gradiometry applications that have the potential for greater resolving power than borehole gravity alone. This has promise in both the petroleum and geosequestration industries; however, the effect of inherent uncertainties in the ability of downhole gravity gradiometry to resolve a subsurface signal is unknown. Here, we utilise the open source modelling package, Fatiando a Terra, to model both the gravity and gravity gradiometry responses of a subsurface body. We use a Monte Carlo approach to vary the geological structure and reference densities of the model within preset distributions. We then perform 100 000 simulations to constrain the mean response of the buried body as well as uncertainties in these results. We varied our modelled borehole to be either centred on the anomaly, adjacent to the anomaly (in the -direction), and 2500 m distant to the anomaly (also in the -direction). We demonstrate that gravity gradiometry is able to resolve a reservoir-scale modelled subsurface density variation up to 2500 m away, and that certain gravity gradient components (Gzz, Gxz, and Gxx) are particularly sensitive to this variation in gravity/gradiometry above the level of uncertainty in the model. The responses provided by downhole gravity gradiometry modelling clearly demonstrate a technique that can be utilised in determining a buried density contrast, which will be of particular use in the emerging industry of CO geosequestration. The results also provide a strong benchmark for the development of newly emerging prototype downhole gravity gradiometers.

,

In this paper, we describe the utilisation of numerical models to simulate the downhole application of gravity gradiometry in order to benchmark the impact of a density contrast at depth, with specific application to monitor a density contrast consistent with the sequestration of CO displacing brine water in an abandoned oil reservoir.

]
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG15039
2017-09-01
2026-01-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bell R. E. Anderson R. Pratson L. 1997 Gravity gradiometry resurfaces: The Leading Edge 16 55 59 10.1190/1.1437431
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1437431 [Google Scholar]
  2. Chilès, J.-P., and Delfiner, P., 2008, Geostatistics: modeling spatial uncertainty: Wiley Online Library.
  3. Dodds K. Krahenbuhl R. Reitz A. Li Y. Hovorka S. 2013 Evaluating time-lapse borehole gravity for CO2 plume detection at SECARB Cranfield: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 18 421 429 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.05.024
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.05.024 [Google Scholar]
  4. Dransfield, M., 2007, Airborne gravity gradiometry in the search for mineral deposits, in B. Milkereit, ed., Exploration in the New Millennium: Proceedings of the Fifth Decennial International Conference on Mineral Exploration, 341–354.
  5. Gravitec, n.d., Gravity gradiometer. Available at: http://www.gravitec.co.nz/gravity_gradiometer.html (accessed 10 November 2015).
  6. Hopkins J. 1975 Gravity gradiometry - a rebirth: Canadian Journal of Exploration Geophysics 11 34 37
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Jacob T. Rohmer J. Manceau J.-C. 2016 Using surface and borehole time-lapse gravity to monitor CO2 in saline aquifers: a numerical feasibility study: Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology 6 34 54 10.1002/ghg.1532
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.1532 [Google Scholar]
  8. Jekeli C. 1993 A review of gravity gradiometer survey system data analyses: Geophysics 58 508 514 10.1190/1.1443433
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443433 [Google Scholar]
  9. Kearey, P., Brooks, M., and Hill, I., 2002, An introduction to geophysical exploration (3rd edition): Blackwell Publishing.
  10. Lockerbie, N., 2013, Development of a downhole gravity gradiometer (AMADEUS). University of Strathclyde Glasgow. Available at https://pure.strath.ac.uk/portal/en/projects/development-of-a-downhole-gravity-gradiometer-amadeus(4c3b214b-d607-4b03-9e6a-c6c04e69643d).html
  11. Nagy D. Papp G. Benedek J. 2000 The gravitational potential and its derivatives for the prism: Journal of Geodesy 74 552 560 10.1007/s001900000116
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s001900000116 [Google Scholar]
  12. pbEncom, 2014, ModelVision v14.0 User Guide, pp. 675–678. Available at: http://www.pitneybowes.com/content/dam/pitneybowes/pbencom/en/modelvision/M odelVision14_User_Guide.pdf (accessed 12 October 2015).
  13. Uieda, L., Oliveira, V. C., Jr, and Barbosa, V. C. F., 2013, Modeling the Earth with Fatiando a Terra: Proceedings of the 12th Python in Science Conference (SciPy 2013), 96–103.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG15039
Loading
/content/journals/10.1071/EG15039
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): borehole, gradiometry, gravity, Monte Carlo.

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error