1887
Volume 48, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

[

Azimuthal P-wave amplitude variation with offset (AVO) offers a method for the characterisation of a naturally fractured system in a reservoir. This information is important for the analysis of fluid flow during production of, for example, oil, petroleum and natural gas. This paper provides a modelling scheme by incorporating the squirt-flow model for the prediction of velocity dispersion and attenuation with azimuthal reflectivity method for the calculation of frequency-dependent seismic responses. Azimuthal AVO responses from a fractured poroelastic sandstone layer encased within shale are investigated based on the proposed method. Azimuthal reflections are a combination of the dynamic information including the contrast in anisotropic properties, anisotropic propagation and attenuation within the layer, as well as tuning and interferences. Modelling results indicate that seismic responses from the top of the sandstone layer are dominated by reflection coefficients, and show azimuthal variations at far offset which is consistent with conventional azimuthal AVO theory. Reflections from the base, however, demonstrate complex azimuthal variations due to anisotropic propagation and attenuation of transmission waves within the layer. Tuning and interferences further complicate the azimuthal AVO responses for thinner layer thickness. The AVO responses of top reflections show no azimuthal variations for lower fluid mobility, while those of base reflections show visible and stable azimuthal variations even at near and moderate offsets for different fluid mobility. Results also reveal that it would be practical to investigate wavetrains reflected from the fractured layers that are regarded as integrated units, especially for thinner layers where reflections from the top and base are indistinguishable. In addition, near-offset stacked amplitudes of the reflected wavetrains show detectable azimuthal variations, which may offer an initial look at fracture orientations before AVO analysis.

,

Frequency-dependent seismic responses from a fractured sandstone layer show complex azimuthal variations due to anisotropic propagation and attenuation of transmission waves associated with fluid flow. It would be practical to investigate wavetrains reflected from the fractured layers that are regarded as integrated units.

]
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG15050
2017-03-01
2026-01-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Batzle M. L. Han D. H. Hofmann R. 2006 Fluid mobility and frequency dependent seismic velocity – direct measurements: Geophysics 71 N1 N9 10.1190/1.2159053
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2159053 [Google Scholar]
  2. Chapman M. 2003 Frequency dependent anisotropy due to meso-scale fractures in the presence of equant porosity: Geophysical Prospecting 51 369 379 10.1046/j.1365‑2478.2003.00384.x
    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2003.00384.x [Google Scholar]
  3. Chapman M. Maultzsch S. Liu E. Li X. Y. 2003 The effect of fluid saturation in an anisotropic multi-scale equant porosity model: Journal of Applied Geophysics 54 191 202 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2003.01.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2003.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chapman M. Liu E. Li X. Y. 2005 The influence of abnormally high reservoir attenuation on the AVO signature: The Leading Edge 24 1120 1125 10.1190/1.2135103
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2135103 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chapman M. Liu E. Li X. Y. 2006 The influence of fluid-sensitive dispersion and attenuation on AVO analysis: Geophysical Journal International 167 89 105 10.1111/j.1365‑246X.2006.02919.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02919.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Ekanem A. M. Li X. Y. Chapman M. Main I. G. 2015 Seismic attenuation in fractured porous media: insights from a hybrid numerical and analytical model: Journal of Geophysics and Engineering 12 210 219 10.1088/1742‑2132/12/2/210
    https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/12/2/210 [Google Scholar]
  7. Far M. E. Sayers C. M. Thomsen L. Han D. Castagna J. P. 2013 a Seismic characterization of naturally fractured reservoirs using amplitude versus offset and azimuth analysis: Geophysical Prospecting 61 427 447 10.1111/1365‑2478.12011
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12011 [Google Scholar]
  8. Far M. E. Thomsen L. Sayers C. M. 2013 b Seismic characterization of naturally reservoirs with asymmetric fractures: Geophysics 78 N1 N10 10.1190/geo2012‑0319.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2012-0319.1 [Google Scholar]
  9. Far M. E. Hardage B. Wagner D. 2014 Fracture parameter inversion for Marcellus Shale: Geophysics 79 C55 C63 10.1190/geo2013‑0236.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2013-0236.1 [Google Scholar]
  10. Guo Z. Q. Liu C. Li X. Y. Lan H. T. 2015 An improved method for the modeling of frequency-dependent amplitude-versus-offset variations: IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 12 63 67 10.1109/LGRS.2014.2326157
    https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2014.2326157 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hall S. A. Kendall J. 2003 Fracture characterization at Valhall: application of P-wave amplitude variation with offset and azimuth (AVOA) analysis to a 3D ocean-bottom dataset: Geophysics 68 1150 1160 10.1190/1.1598107
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1598107 [Google Scholar]
  12. Landrø M Tsvankin I 2007 Seismic critical-angle reflectometry: a method to characterize azimuthal anisotropy? Geophysics 72 D41 D50 10.1190/1.2437145
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2437145 [Google Scholar]
  13. MacBeth C. 1999 Azimuthal variation in P-wave signatures due to fluid flow: Geophysics 64 1181 1192 10.1190/1.1444625
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444625 [Google Scholar]
  14. Pérez M. A. Gibson R. L. Toksöz M. N. 1999 Detection of fracture orientation using azimuthal variation of P-wave AVO responses: Geophysics 64 1253 1265 10.1190/1.1444632
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444632 [Google Scholar]
  15. Rüger A. 1998 Variation of P-wave reflectivity with offset and azimuth in anisotropic media: Geophysics 63 935 947 10.1190/1.1444405
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444405 [Google Scholar]
  16. Rüger, A., and Tsvankin, I., 1995, Azimuthal variation of AVO response for fractured reservoirs: 65th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1103–1106.
  17. Rüger A. Tsvankin I. 1997 Using AVO for fracture detection: analytic basis and practical solutions: The Leading Edge 16 1429 1434 10.1190/1.1437466
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1437466 [Google Scholar]
  18. Rutherford S. R. Williams R. H. 1989 Amplitude-versus-offset variations in gas sands: Geophysics 54 680 688 10.1190/1.1442696
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442696 [Google Scholar]
  19. Sayers C. M. Rickett J. E. 1997 Azimuthal variation in AVO response for fractured gas sands: Geophysical Prospecting 45 165 182 10.1046/j.1365‑2478.1997.3180238.x
    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2478.1997.3180238.x [Google Scholar]
  20. Schoenberg M. A. Protázio J. 1992 ‘Zoeppritz’ rationalized and generalized to anisotropy: Journal of Seismic Exploration 1 125 144
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Schoenberg M. A. Dean S. Sayers C. M. 1999 Azimuth-dependent tuning of seismic waves reflected from fractured reservoirs: Geophysics 64 1160 1171 10.1190/1.1444623
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444623 [Google Scholar]
  22. Vavryčuk V. Pšenčík I. 1998 PP-wave reflection coefficients in weakly anisotropic elastic media: Geophysics 63 2129 2141 10.1190/1.1444506
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444506 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1071/EG15050
Loading
/content/journals/10.1071/EG15050
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error