1887
Volume 48, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

[

Electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) is a useful tool to map near-surface conducting anomalies. The detailed ERT survey was taken over an already defined conducting zone on a regional scale through a magnetotelluric (MT) survey, in order to provide better resolution of the subsurface structure within the study area. The survey lines were carried out crossing the delineated conducting zone through MT giving a dense coverage over the area. The ERT survey were carried out along 15 lines covering an area of ~1 km2 with a line spacing of ~50 m in the northern fringe of the Dalma volcanics (DVs). The study utilised the 61-channel cum 64-electrode resistivity equipment, FlashRES-Universal ERT multi-electrode data acquisition system, developed by ZZ Resistivity Imaging, Australia. Data has been acquired both through conventional arrays i.e. Wenner, Schlumberger and ZZ unconventional arrays. Inversion of the data set have been performed using 2.5D finite element conjugate gradient algorithm after performing the quality check. Resistivity models along all the lines were obtained using Wenner, Schlumberger and combination of Wenner, Schlumberger and ZZ arrays. Resistivity models resolved four major zones: (1) resistivity less than 1 Ωm; (2) resistivity 1–10 Ωm; (3) resistivity 10–100 Ωm; and (4) resistivity more than 100 Ωm . The resistivity results corroborate well with the geological succession from the drilling data. The conducting zones with resistivity values ranging from 1–10 Ωm correlates with the Lower Dalma volcanics while the Upper Dalma volcanics corresponds to the regions with resistivity values of less than 1 Ωm. The Upper Dalma volcanics corresponds to the metallogeny while the depth to the top of the ore body is ~25 m.

,

An ERT survey was conducted over a defined conducting zone through a magnetotelluric survey in the Dalma volcanics, India. The resistivity models resolved four major zones and the results corroborate well with the geological succession. The resistivity values of less than 1 Ωm at a depth of ~25 m correspond to the deposit.

]
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG15078
2017-12-01
2026-01-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anand S. P. Rajaram M. 2006 Aeromagnetic data analysis for the identification of concealed uranium deposits: a case history from Singhbhum uranium province, India: Earth, Planets, and Space 58 1099 1103 10.1186/BF03352616
    https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352616 [Google Scholar]
  2. Beresnev I. A. Hruby C. E. Davis C. A. 2002 The use of multielectrode resistivity imaging in gravel prospecting: Journal of Applied Geophysics 49 245 254 10.1016/S0926‑9851(02)00147‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(02)00147-7 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bery A. A. Saad R. Mohamad E. T. Jinmin M. Azwin I. N. Akip Tan N. M. Nordiana M. M. 2012 Electrical resistivity and induced polarization data correlation with conductivity for iron ore exploration: The Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 17 3223 3233
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhattacharya, B. B., and Shalivahan, 2016, Geoelectric methods: theory and applications: McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited (in press).
  5. Biswas A. Mandal A. Sharma S. P. Mohanty W. K. 2014 Delineation of subsurface structures using self-potential, gravity, and resistivity surveys from South Purulia Shear Zone, India: Implication to uranium mineralization: Interpretation (Tulsa) 2 T103 T110 10.1190/INT‑2013‑0170.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/INT-2013-0170.1 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bose, M. K., 2008, Petrology and geochemistry of the proterozoic ‘newer Dolerite’ and associated ultramafic dyke within Singhbhum granite pluton, eastern India, in R. K. Srivastava, ed., Indian dykes: geochemistry, geophysics, and geochronology: Narosa Publishing House Pvt Ltd, New Delhi, India.
  7. Bose M. K. 2009 Precambrian mafic magmatism in the Singhbhum craton, eastern India: Journal of the Geological Society of India 73 13 35 10.1007/s12594‑009‑0002‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-009-0002-3 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chakraborti M. K. Bose M. K. 1985 Evaluation of the tectonic setting of Precambrian Dalma volcanic belt, eastern India using trace element data: Precambrian Research 28 253 268 10.1016/0301‑9268(85)90033‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9268(85)90033-6 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dahlin T. Zhou B. 2006 Gradient array measurements for multi-channel 2D resistivity imaging: Near Surface Geophysics 4 113 123
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Das L. K. Agarwal B. N. P. 2001 The evolution of the Singhbhum Craton, a geophysical perspective: Indian Minerals 55 143 170
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Deb M. 2014 Precambrian geodynamics and metallogeny of the Indian shield: Ore Geology Reviews 57 1 28 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2013.08.022
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2013.08.022 [Google Scholar]
  12. Edwards L. S. 1977 A modified pseudosection for resistivity and induced-polarization: Geophysics 42 1020 1036 10.1190/1.1440762
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440762 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ford, K., Keating, P., and Thomas, M. D., 2007, Overview of geophysical signatures associated with Canadian ore deposits, in W. D. Goodfellow, ed., Mineral deposits of Canada – a synthesis of major deposit-types, district metallogeny, the evolution of geological provinces, and exploration methods: Geological Association of Canada, Mineral Deposits Division, Special Publication, 5, 939–970.
  14. Green T. H. 1995 Significance of Nb/Ta as an indicator of geochemical processes in the crust–mantle system: Chemical Geology 120 347 359 10.1016/0009‑2541(94)00145‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(94)00145-X [Google Scholar]
  15. Griffiths D. H. Baker R. D. 1993 Two-dimensional resistivity imaging and modelling in areas of complex geology: Journal of Applied Geophysics 29 211 226 10.1016/0926‑9851(93)90005‑J
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-9851(93)90005-J [Google Scholar]
  16. Gupta, A., and Basu, A., 2000, North Singhbhum Proterozoic mobile belt Eastern India – a review: Geological Survey of India Special Publication, 55, 195–226.
  17. Kailasam L. N. 1975 Epeirogenic studies in India with reference to recent vertical movements: Tectonophysics 29 505 521 10.1016/0040‑1951(75)90178‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(75)90178-X [Google Scholar]
  18. Kemna A. Binley A. Ramirez A. Daily W. 2000 Complex resistivity tomography for environmental applications: Chemical Engineering Journal 77 11 18 10.1016/S1385‑8947(99)00135‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1385-8947(99)00135-7 [Google Scholar]
  19. Loke, M. H. (2000), Electrical imaging surveys for environmental and engineering studies: a practical guide to 2-D and 3-D surveys, 1–20.
  20. Loke, M. H. (2012), Tutorial: 2-D and 3-D electrical imaging surveys, 1–18.
  21. Longo V. Testone V. Oggiano G. Testa A. 2014 Prospecting for clay minerals within volcanic successions: application of electrical resistivity tomography to characterise bentonite deposits in northern Sardinia (Italy): Journal of Applied Geophysics 111 21 32 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.09.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.09.014 [Google Scholar]
  22. Mahadevan, T. M., 2002, Geology of Bihar and Jharkhand: Geological Society of India.
  23. Maurya V. P. Shalivahan Bhattacharya B. B. Adhikari P. K. Das L. K. 2015 Preliminary magnetotelluric results across Dalma Volcanics, Eastern India: inferences on metallogeny: Journal of Applied Geophysics 115 171 182 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.02.021
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.02.021 [Google Scholar]
  24. Mazumder R. 2005 Proterozoic sedimentation and volcanism in the Singhbhum crustal province, India and their implications: Sedimentary Geology 176 167 193 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2004.12.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2004.12.011 [Google Scholar]
  25. Milkereit B. Eaton D. Wu J. Perron G. Salisbury M. 1996 Seismic imaging of massive sulfide deposits – part II. Reflection seismic profiling: Economic Geology and the Bulletin of the Society of Economic Geologists 91 829 834 10.2113/gsecongeo.91.5.829
    https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.91.5.829 [Google Scholar]
  26. Mineral Exploration Corporation Limited, 2010, Geological report on detailed exploration for gold ore in Parasi (Central Block) gold deposit – phase-I & phase-II, north of Sonapet anticline, district: Ranchi, Jharkhand.
  27. Morgan, L. A., 2012, Geophysical characteristics of volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits in volcanogenic massive sulfide occurrence model: US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5070–C, chap. 7, 115–131.
  28. Pal D. C. Barton M. D. Sarangi A. K. 2009 Deciphering a multistage history affecting U– Cu(–Fe) mineralization in the Singhbhum Shear Zone, eastern India, using pyrite textures and compositions in the Turamdih U–Cu(–Fe) deposit: Mineralium Deposita 44 61 80 10.1007/s00126‑007‑0165‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00126-007-0165-z [Google Scholar]
  29. Pal D. C. Trumbull R. B. Wiedenbeck M. 2010 Chemical and boron isotope compositions of tourmaline from Jaduguda U (–Cu–Fe) deposit, Singhbhum shear zone, India: implications for the sources and evolution of mineralizing fluids: Chemical Geology 277 245 260 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2010.08.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2010.08.008 [Google Scholar]
  30. Panek T. Hradecky J. Silhan K. 2008 Application of electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) in the study of various types of slope deformations in anisotropic bedrock: case studies from the Flysch Carpathians: Studia Geomorphologica Carpatho-Balcanica 42 57 73
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Prasad, K., Nagaraja, P. K., and Roy, S. K., 2014, Report on ground geophysical mapping in parts of toposheet no. 73J/1, J/2, J/5 & J/6, East Singhbhum district of Jharkhand, Mayurbhanj district of Odisha and Purulia district of West Bengal, FS 2013–14, unpub. rep. of GSI.
  32. Ramirez A. Daily W. Binley A. LaBrecque D. 1999 Electrical impedance tomography of known targets: Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics 4 11 26 10.4133/JEEG4.1.11
    https://doi.org/10.4133/JEEG4.1.11 [Google Scholar]
  33. Revil A. Leroy P. Titov K. 2005 Characterization of transport properties of argillaceous sediments. Application to the Callovo-Oxfordian Argillite: Journal of Geophysical Research 110 B06202 10.1029/2004JB003442
    https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JB003442 [Google Scholar]
  34. Roy A. Sarkar A. Jeyakumar S. Aggarwal S. K. Ebihara M. 2002 Mid-Proterozoic plume-related thermal event in eastern Indian craton: evidence from trace elements, REE geochemistry and Sr–Nd isotope systematics of basic–ultrabasic intrusives from Dalma volcanic belt: Gondwana Research 5 133 146 10.1016/S1342‑937X(05)70897‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1342-937X(05)70897-2 [Google Scholar]
  35. Saha, A. K., 1994, Crustal evolution of Singhbhum-North Orissa, eastern India: Geological Society of India, Memoirs, 27, 341 pp.
  36. Salisbury M. Milkereit B. Bleeker W. 1996 Seismic imaging of massive sulfide deposits – part I. Rock properties: Economic Geology and the Bulletin of the Society of Economic Geologists 91 821 828 10.2113/gsecongeo.91.5.821
    https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.91.5.821 [Google Scholar]
  37. Sarkar, S. C., 1984, Geology and ore mineralisation along the Singhbhum copper uranium belt: Ph.D. thesis, Jadavpur University, Calcutta.
  38. Sarkar S. C. Deb M. 1974 Metamorphism of the sulfides of the Singhbhum copper belt, India – the evidence from the ore fabric: Economic Geology and the Bulletin of the Society of Economic Geologists 68 1283 1293
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Savin, C., Robineau, B., Monteil, G., Beauvais, A., Parisot, J. C., and Ritz, M., 2003, Electrical imaging of peridotite weathering mantles as a complementary tool for nickel ore exploration in New Caledonia: ASEG 16th Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, 1–5.
  40. Schrott L. Saas O. 2008 Application of field geophysics in geomorphology: advances and limitations exemplified by case studies: Geomorphology 93 55 73 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.12.024
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.12.024 [Google Scholar]
  41. Sengupta D. Kumar R. Singh A. K. Prasad R. 2001 Radon exhalation and radiometric prospecting on rocks associated with Cu–U mineralizations in the Singhbhum shear zone, Bihar: Applied Radiation and Isotopes 55 889 894 10.1016/S0969‑8043(00)00344‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-8043(00)00344-4 [Google Scholar]
  42. Shalivahan Bhattacharya B. B. Chalapathi Rao N. V. Maurya V. P. 2014 Thin lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary beneath Eastern Indian craton: Tectonophysics 612–613 128 133
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Stummer P. Maurer H. Green A. 2004 Experimental design: electrical resistivity data sets that provide optimum subsurface information: Geophysics 69 120 139 10.1190/1.1649381
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1649381 [Google Scholar]
  44. Verma R. K. Sharma A. U. S. Mukhopadhyay M. 1984 Gravity field over Singhbhum, its relationship to geology and tectonic history: Tectonophysics 106 87 107 10.1016/0040‑1951(84)90223‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(84)90223-3 [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhe J. Greenhalgh S. Marescot L. 2007 Multichannel, full waveform and flexible electrode combination resistivity-imaging system: Geophysics 72 F57 F64 10.1190/1.2435081
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2435081 [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhou B. Greenhalgh S. A. 1999 Explicit expressions and numerical calculations for the Fre’chet and second derivatives in 2.5D Helmholtz equation inversion: Geophysical Prospecting 47 443 468 10.1046/j.1365‑2478.1999.00139.x
    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2478.1999.00139.x [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhou B. Greenhalgh S. A. 2000 Crosshole resistivity tomography using different electrode configurations: Geophysical Prospecting 48 887 912 10.1046/j.1365‑2478.2000.00220.x
    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2000.00220.x [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1071/EG15078
Loading
/content/journals/10.1071/EG15078
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Dalma volcanics, ERT, metallogeny, VMS, ZZ array.

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error