1887
Volume 49, Issue 5
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

[

The archaeological site of Sagalassos is a very important settlement located in a magnificent mountain landscape, 7 km north from a village named Ağlasun (province of Burdur, south-west Turkey). Since 1990, the University of Leuven (Belgium) has carried out an interdisciplinary archaeological research program that studies >1000 years of uninterrupted human occupation in Sagalassos, concerning all historical aspects of daily life from architecture, to trade and its mechanisms and environmental conditions. The ancient Roman city is covered by layers of eroded soil that has preserved many secrets waiting to be revealed. A geophysical campaign was planned along the south facing terraces of the mountain slopes to highlight the structure of the city that remains covered in soil. Site conditions (high slope, high grass, several obstacles) and the need to investigate to depths greater than 20 m influenced the choice of geophysical methods; we chose to use both passive and active electrical resistivity tomography. Three different areas, labelled Area 1, Area 2 and Area 3, were investigated, with results revealing information about the location, depth, size and extent of buried archaeological features. Of particular interest is the presence of: (i) a deep depression in Area 1, thought to be a clay quarry; (ii) a number of tombs related to the Byzantine period in Area 2; and (iii) defensive walls in Area 3.

,

The ancient Roman city of Sagalassos (Turkey) is covered by layers of eroded soil that have preserved many secrets waiting to be revealed. A geophysical campaign was planned to highlight the buried structure. Geophysics revealed evidence of a clay quarry, a number of tombs related to the Byzantine period and defensive walls.

]
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG16154
2018-10-01
2026-01-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Argote-Espino D. Tejero-Andrade A. Cifuentes-Nava G. Iriarte L. Farıas S. Chavez R. E. Lopez F. 2013 3D electrical prospection in the archaeological site El Pahnu, Hidalgo State, Central Mexico:Journal of Archaeological Science4012131223 10.1016/j.jas.2012.08.034
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.08.034 [Google Scholar]
  2. Burger, H. R., and Burger, D. C., 1992, Exploration geophysics of the shallow subsurface: Prentice Hall.
  3. Chavez, R. E., Chavez-Hernandez, G., Tejero, A., and Alcantara, M. A., 2011, The ‘L-Array’, a 3D tool to characterize a fracture pattern in an urban zone: Near Surface 2011 – 17th EAGE European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Expanded Abstracts, 114–155.
  4. Clark, A. J., 1980, Archaeological detection by resistivity: M.Sc. thesis, University of Southampton.
  5. De Giorgi L. Leucci G. 2015 Study of shallow low-enthalpy geothermal resources using integrated geophysical methods:Acta Geophysica63125153 10.2478/s11600‑014‑0243‑4
    https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-014-0243-4 [Google Scholar]
  6. Degryse P. Poblome J. Donners K. Deckers J. Waelkens M. 2003 Geoarchaeological investigations of the ‘potters’ quarter’ at Sagalassos, southwest Turkey:Geoarchaeology18255281 10.1002/gea.10060
    https://doi.org/10.1002/gea.10060 [Google Scholar]
  7. Di Fiore B. Mauriello P. Monna D. Patella D. 2002 Examples of application of tensorial resistivity probability tomography to architectonic and archaeological targets:Annals of Geophysics45417429
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Drahor M. G. 2004 Application of the self-potential method to archaeological prospection: some case histories:Archaeological Prospection1177105 10.1002/arp.224
    https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.224 [Google Scholar]
  9. Drahor M. G. Akyol A. L. Dilaver N. 1996 An application of self-potential (SP) method in archaeogeophysical prospection:Archaeological Prospection3141158 10.1002/(SICI)1099‑0763(199609)3:3<141::AID‑ARP53>3.0.CO;2‑I
    https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0763(199609)3:3<141::AID-ARP53>3.0.CO;2-I [Google Scholar]
  10. El-Gamili M. M. El-Mahmoudi A. S. Osman S. S. Hassaneen A. G. Metwaly M. A. 1999 Geoelectric resistance scanning on parts of Abydos Cemetery Region, Sohag Governorate, Upper Egypt:Archaeological Prospection6225239 10.1002/(SICI)1099‑0763(199912)6:4<225::AID‑ARP126>3.0.CO;2‑S
    https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0763(199912)6:4<225::AID-ARP126>3.0.CO;2-S [Google Scholar]
  11. Eppelbaum L. V. Khesin B. E. Itkis S. E. 2001 Prompt magnetic investigations of archaeological remains in areas of infrastructure development: Israeli experience:Archaeological Prospection8163185 10.1002/arp.167
    https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.167 [Google Scholar]
  12. Eppelbaum, L. V., Khesin, B. E., Itkis, S. E., and Ben-Avraham, Z., 2004, Advanced analysis of self-potential data in ore deposits and archaeological sites: Proceedings of the 10th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 4 pp.
  13. Griffiths D. H. Barker R. D. 1994 Electrical imaging in archaeology:Journal of Archaeological Science21153158 10.1006/jasc.1994.1017
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jasc.1994.1017 [Google Scholar]
  14. Leucci G. De Giorgi L. Scardozzi G. 2014 Geophysical prospecting and remote sensing for the study of the San Rossore area in Pisa (Tuscany, Italy):Journal of Archaeological Science52256276 10.1016/j.jas.2014.08.028
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.08.028 [Google Scholar]
  15. Leucci G. Parise M. Sammarco M. Scardozzi G. 2016 The use of geophysical prospections to map ancient hydraulic works: the Triglio underground aqueduct (Apulia, southern Italy):Archaeological Prospection23 3 195211 10.1002/arp.1541
    https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.1541 [Google Scholar]
  16. Leucci G. De Giorgi L. Gizzi F. T. Persico R. 2017 Integrated geo-scientific surveys in the historical centre of Mesagne (Brindisi, Southern Italy):Natural Hazards86363383 10.1007/s11069‑016‑2645‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2645-x [Google Scholar]
  17. Loke, M. H., 2001, Electrical imaging surveys for environmental and engineering studies: a practical guide to 2-D and 3-D surveys online. Available at: http://personales.upv.es/jpadin/lokenote.pdf.
  18. Mauriello, P., and Patella, D., 2005, Introduction to tensorial resistivity probability tomography. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0512147, 1–8.
  19. Negri S. Leucci G. Mazzone F. 2008 High resolution 3D ERT to help GPR data interpretation for researching archaeological items in a geologically complex subsurface:Journal of Applied Geophysics65111120 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.06.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.06.004 [Google Scholar]
  20. Reynolds, J. M., 2011, An introduction to applied and environmental geophysics (2nd edition): Wiley – Blackwell.
  21. Schmidt, A., 2013, Earth resistance for archaeologists: Alta Mira Press.
  22. Tejero-Andrade A. Cifuentes G. Chavez R. E. Lopez Gonzalez A. Delgado-Solorzano C. 2015 L- and CORNER-arrays for 3D electrical resistivity tomography: an alternative for geophysical surveys in urban zones:Near Surface Geophysics13355367 10.3997/1873‑0604.2015015
    https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2015015 [Google Scholar]
  23. Vermoere M. Six S. Poblome J. Degryse P. Paulissen E. Waelkens M. Smets E. 2003 Pollen sequences from the city of Sagalassos (Psidia, southwest Turkey):Anatolian Studies53161173 10.2307/3643093
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3643093 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1071/EG16154
Loading
/content/journals/10.1071/EG16154
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): archaeology; ERT; Sagalassos; SP; tensor resistivity

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error