1887
Volume 49, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

[

We propose an elastic full-waveform inversion method based on P- and S-wave mode separation to mitigate the crosstalk artefacts between P- and S-wave modes by deriving the gradient formulas with respect to various wave modes using a P- and S-wave mode separated first-order velocity-stress wave equation.

,

Multi-parameter elastic full-waveform inversion (EFWI) attempts to find high resolution model parameters that are able to match observed data exactly by minimising residuals between the observed and predicted data. However, the coupling of V and V, and the cross-talk artefacts between P- and S-wave modes increase non-uniqueness and ill-conditionedness. We propose a new EFWI method based on P- and S-wave mode separation to mitigate these problems. In this method, we derive the gradient formulas with respect to various wave modes using a P- and S-wave mode separated first-order velocity-stress wave equation, and use a step search method in subspace to calculate the corresponding step lengths. The algorithm, called wave-mode separation EFWI (SEFWI), appears to be helpful to weaken non-uniqueness and ill-conditionedness of conventional EFWI by decoupling multiple parameters. Numerical examples conducted with a synthetic dataset modelled on a simple model with anomalies reveal that SEFWI can reduce the cross-talk artefacts between P- and S-wave modes. Synthetic tests on the Marmousi2 model demonstrate that SEFWI yields better inversion results than conventional EFWI. Although the computational cost of SEFWI per iteration is 1.81 times as much as that of EFWI, the total computational cost is almost at the same level, because of its faster convergence rate.

]
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG16158
2018-08-01
2026-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aki, K., and Richards, P., 2002, Quantitative seismology (2nd edition): University Science Books.
  2. Boonyasiriwat C. Valasek P. Routh P. Cao W. Schuster G. Macy B. 2009 An efficient multiscale method for time-domain waveform tomography: Geophysics 74 WCC59 WCC68 10.1190/1.3151869
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3151869 [Google Scholar]
  3. Brossier R. Operto S. Virieux J. 2009 Seismic imaging of complex onshore structures by 2D elastic frequency-domain full-waveform inversion: Geophysics 74 WCC105 WCC118 10.1190/1.3215771
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3215771 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brossier R. Operto S. Virieux J. 2010 Which data residual norm for robust elastic frequency-domain full waveform inversion: Geophysics 75 R37 R46 10.1190/1.3379323
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3379323 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bunks C. Saleck F. Zaleski S. Chavent G. 1995 Multiscale seismic waveform inversion: Geophysics 60 1457 1473 10.1190/1.1443880
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443880 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cheong, S., Shin, C., Pyun, S., Min, D. J., and Suh, S., 2004, Efficient calculation of steepest descent direction for source-independent waveform inversion using normalized wavefield by convolution: SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 1842–1845.
  7. Choi Y. Alkhalifah T. 2011 Source-independent time-domain waveform inversion using convolved wavefields: Application to the encoded multisource waveform inversion: Geophysics 76 R125 R134 10.1190/geo2010‑0210.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2010-0210.1 [Google Scholar]
  8. Choi Y. Shin C. Min D. J. Ha T. 2005 Efficient calculation of the steepest descent direction for source-independent seismic waveform inversion: An amplitude approach: Journal of Computational Physics 208 455 468 10.1016/j.jcp.2004.09.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2004.09.019 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chung W. Shin C. Pyun S. 2010 2D elastic waveform inversion in the Laplace domain: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 100 3239 3249 10.1785/0120100061
    https://doi.org/10.1785/0120100061 [Google Scholar]
  10. Drossaert H. F. Giannopoulos A. 2007 A nonsplit complex frequency-shifted PML based on recursive integration for FDTD modeling of elastic waves: Geophysics 72 T9 T17 10.1190/1.2424888
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2424888 [Google Scholar]
  11. Gélis C. Virieux J. Grandjean G. 2007 Two-dimensional elastic full waveform inversion using Born and Rytov formulations in the frequency domain: Geophysical Journal International 168 605 633 10.1111/j.1365‑246X.2006.03135.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03135.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Guitton A. Ayeni G. Diaz E. 2012 Constrained full-waveform inversion by model reparameterization: Geophysics 77 R117 R127 10.1190/geo2011‑0196.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011-0196.1 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hu, W., 2014, FWI without low frequency data-beat tone inversion: SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 1116–1120.
  14. Kamei R. Pratt R. G. 2013 Inversion strategies for visco-acoustic waveform inversion: Geophysical Journal International 194 859 884 10.1093/gji/ggt109
    https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt109 [Google Scholar]
  15. Kang S. G. Bae H. S. Shin C. 2012 Laplace–Fourier-domain waveform inversion for fluid–solid media: Pure and Applied Geophysics 169 2165 2179 10.1007/s00024‑012‑0467‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-012-0467-7 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kennett B. L. N. Sambridge M. S. Williamson P. R. 1988 Subspace methods for large inverse problems with multiple parameter classes: Geophysical Journal International 94 237 247 10.1111/j.1365‑246X.1988.tb05898.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1988.tb05898.x [Google Scholar]
  17. Köhn D. De Nil D. Kurzmann A. Przebindowska A. Bohlen T. 2012 On the influence of model parametrization in elastic full waveform tomography: Geophysical Journal International 191 325 345 10.1111/j.1365‑246X.2012.05633.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05633.x [Google Scholar]
  18. Krebs J. R. Anderson J. E. Hinkley D. Neelamani R. Lee S. Baumstein A. Lacasse M. D. 2009 Fast full-wavefield seismic inversion using encoded sources: Geophysics 74 WCC177 WCC188 10.1190/1.3230502
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3230502 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee K. H. Kim H. J. 2003 Source-independent full-waveform inversion of seismic data: Geophysics 68 2010 2015 10.1190/1.1635054
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1635054 [Google Scholar]
  20. Li Z. Zhang H. Liu Q. Han W. 2007 Numeric simulation of elastic wavefield separation by staggering grid high-order finite-difference algorithm: Oil Geophysical Prospecting 42 510 515
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Liu, Y., Symes, W. W., and Li, Z., 2013, Multisource least-squares extended reverse-time migration with preconditioning guided gradient method: SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 3709–3715.
  22. Liu Y. Yang J. Chi B. Dong L. 2015 An improved scattering-integral approach for frequency-domain full waveform inversion: Geophysical Journal International 202 1827 1842 10.1093/gji/ggv254
    https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv254 [Google Scholar]
  23. Martin G. Wiley R. Marfurt K. 2006 Marmousi2: an elastic upgrade for Marmousi: The Leading Edge 25 156 166 10.1190/1.2172306
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2172306 [Google Scholar]
  24. Mora P. 1987 Nonlinear two-dimensional elastic inversion of multioffset seismic data: Geophysics 52 1211 1228 10.1190/1.1442384
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442384 [Google Scholar]
  25. Park E. Ha W. Chung W. Shin C. Min D. J. 2013 2D Laplace-domain waveform inversion of field data using a power objective function: Pure and Applied Geophysics 170 2075 2085 10.1007/s00024‑013‑0651‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-013-0651-4 [Google Scholar]
  26. Plessix R. E. Solano C. A. P. 2015 Modified surface boundary conditions for elastic waveform inversion of low-frequency wide-angle active land seismic data: Geophysical Journal International 201 1324 1334 10.1093/gji/ggv087
    https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv087 [Google Scholar]
  27. Pratt R. 1990 Frequency-domain elastic modeling by finite differences: a tool for crosshole seismic imaging: Geophysics 55 626 632 10.1190/1.1442874
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442874 [Google Scholar]
  28. Pratt R. 1999 Seismic waveform inversion in the frequency domain, part I: theory and verification in a physic scale model: Geophysics 64 888 901 10.1190/1.1444597
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444597 [Google Scholar]
  29. Pratt R. Shipp R. 1999 Seismic waveform inversion in the frequency domain, part 2: fault delineation in sediments using crosshole data: Geophysics 64 902 914 10.1190/1.1444598
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444598 [Google Scholar]
  30. Pratt R. Shin C. Hicks G. J. 1998 Gauss-Newton and full Newton methods in frequency-space seismic waveform inversion: Geophysical Journal International 133 341 362 10.1046/j.1365‑246X.1998.00498.x
    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.1998.00498.x [Google Scholar]
  31. Prieux V. Brossier R. Operto S. Virieux J. 2013 a Multiparameter full waveform inversion of multicomponent ocean-bottom-cable data from the Valhall field. Part 1: imaging compressional wave speed, density and attenuation: Geophysical Journal International 194 1640 1664 10.1093/gji/ggt177
    https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt177 [Google Scholar]
  32. Prieux V. Brossier R. Operto S. Virieux J. 2013 b Multiparameter full waveform inversion of multicomponent ocean-bottom-cable data from the Valhall field. Part 2: imaging compressive-wave and shear-wave velocities: Geophysical Journal International 194 1665 1681 10.1093/gji/ggt178
    https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt178 [Google Scholar]
  33. Qu Y. Huang J. Li Z. Li Q. Zhao L. Li X. 2015 a Elastic wave modeling and pre-stack reverse time migration of irregular free-surface based on layered mapping method: Chinese Journal of Geophysics 58 544 560 10.1002/cjg2.20194
    https://doi.org/10.1002/cjg2.20194 [Google Scholar]
  34. Qu, Y., Li, Z., Huang, J., Li, Q., and Li, J., 2015b, Multiple dual-variable grid encoding full time inversion based on an optimized encoding function: 2015 Workshop: Depth Model Building: Full-Waveform Inversion, 18–19 June 2015, Beijing, China, 125–129.
  35. Qu Y. Li Z. Huang J. Li J. 2016 Multi-scale full waveform inversion for areas with irregular surface topography in an auxiliary coordinate system: Exploration Geophysics in press. 10.1071/EG16037
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG16037 [Google Scholar]
  36. Qu Y. Li Z. Huang J. Li J. 2017 a Viscoacoustic anisotropic full waveform inversion: Journal of Applied Geophysics 136 484 497 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  37. Qu Y Li Z Huang J Li J Guan Z 2017 b Elastic full-waveform inversion for surface topography: Geophysics 82 R269 R285 10.1190/geo2016‑0349.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2016-0349.1 [Google Scholar]
  38. Ren Z. Liu Y. 2016 A hierarchical elastic full-waveform inversion scheme based on wavefield separation and the multistep-length approach: Geophysics 81 R99 R123 10.1190/geo2015‑0431.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2015-0431.1 [Google Scholar]
  39. Sambridge M. S. Tarantola A. Kennett B. L. N. 1991 An alternative strategy for nonlinear inversion of seismic waveforms: Geophysical Prospecting 39 723 736 10.1111/j.1365‑2478.1991.tb00341.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1991.tb00341.x [Google Scholar]
  40. Scales J. A. 1987 Tomographic inversion via the conjugate gradient method: Geophysics 52 179 185 10.1190/1.1442293
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442293 [Google Scholar]
  41. Shin C. Cha Y. H. 2008 Waveform inversion in the Laplace domain: Geophysical Journal International 173 922 931 10.1111/j.1365‑246X.2008.03768.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03768.x [Google Scholar]
  42. Shin C. Cha Y. H. 2009 Waveform inversion in the Laplace–Fourier domain: Geophysical Journal International 177 1067 1079 10.1111/j.1365‑246X.2009.04102.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04102.x [Google Scholar]
  43. Sirgue L. Pratt R. G. 2004 Efficient waveform inversion and imaging: a strategy for selecting temporal frequencies: Geophysics 69 231 248 10.1190/1.1649391
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1649391 [Google Scholar]
  44. Solano, C. A., Stopin, A., and Plessix, R. E., 2013, Synthetic study of elastic effects on acoustic full waveform inversion: 75th EAGE Conference and Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2013, Extended Abstracts, Th P10 10.
  45. Sun R. Chow J. Chen K. J. 2001 Phase correction in separating P-and S-waves in elastic data: Geophysics 66 1515 1518 10.1190/1.1487097
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1487097 [Google Scholar]
  46. Sun R. McMechan G. A. Chuang H. 2011 Amplitude balancing in separating P- and S-waves in 2D and 3D elastic seismic data: Geophysics 76 S103 S113 10.1190/1.3555529
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3555529 [Google Scholar]
  47. Tarantola A. 1984 Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation: Geophysics 49 1259 1266 10.1190/1.1441754
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441754 [Google Scholar]
  48. Tarantola A. 1986 A strategy for nonlinear elastic inversion of seismic reflection data: Geophysics 51 1893 1903 10.1190/1.1442046
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442046 [Google Scholar]
  49. Vigh D. Starr E. W. 2008 3D prestack plane-wave, full-waveform inversion: Geophysics 73 VE135 VE144 10.1190/1.2952623
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2952623 [Google Scholar]
  50. Vigh, D., Starr, B., Kapoor, J., and Li, H., 2010, 3D full waveform inversion on a Gulf of Mexico WAZ data set: SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 957–961.
  51. Virieux J. Operto S. 2009 An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics: Geophysics 74 WCC1 WCC26 10.1190/1.3238367
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3238367 [Google Scholar]
  52. Wang Y. Dong L. 2015 Multi-parameter full waveform inversion for acoustic VTI media using the truncated Newton method: Chinese Journal of Geophysics 58 2873 2885 [in Chinese]. 10.6038/cjg20150821
    https://doi.org/10.6038/cjg20150821 [Google Scholar]
  53. Wang, B. L., and Goo, J. H., 2010, Fast full inversion of multi-shot seismic data: SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 1055–1058.
  54. Wu, R. S., Luo, J., and Wu, B., 2013, Ultra-low-frequency information in seismic data and envelope inversion: SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 3078–3042.
  55. Xue, Z., Chen, Y., Fomel, S., and Sun, J., 2014, Imaging incomplete data and simultaneous-source data using least-squares reverse-time migration with shaping regularization: SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 3991–3996.
  56. Xue Z. Chen Y. Fomel S. Sun J. 2016 Seismic imaging of incomplete data and simultaneous-source data using least-squares reverse-time migration with shaping regularization: Geophysics 81 S11 S20 10.1190/geo2014‑0524.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2014-0524.1 [Google Scholar]
  57. Xue J Zhu H Fomel S 2017 Full-waveform inversion using seislet regularization: Geophysics 82 A43 A49 10.1190/geo2016‑0699.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2016-0699.1 [Google Scholar]
  58. Yang J. Liu Y. Dong L. 2014 A multi-parameter full waveform inversion strategy for acoustic media with variable density: Chinese Journal of Geophysics 57 628 643 [in Chinese]. 10.6038/cjg20140226
    https://doi.org/10.6038/cjg20140226 [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhang Q. McMechan G. A. 2010 2D and 3D elastic wavefield vector decomposition in the wavenumber domain for VTI media: Geophysics 75 D13 D26 10.1190/1.3431045
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3431045 [Google Scholar]
  60. Zhou B. Greenhalgh S. A. 2003 Crosshole seismic inversion with normalized full-waveform amplitude data: Geophysics 68 1320 1330 10.1190/1.1598125
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1598125 [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhou W. Brossier R. Operto S. Virieux J. 2015 Full waveform inversion of diving & reflected waves for velocity model building with impedance inversion based on scale separation: Geophysical Journal International 202 1535 1554 10.1093/gji/ggv228
    https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv228 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1071/EG16158
Loading
/content/journals/10.1071/EG16158
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error