1887
Volume 49, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

[

Global lightning networks catalogue the time and location of up to four million lightning strikes per day. We use lightning network data to predict sferic arrival times, vertical electric field amplitudes and arrival azimuths at an audio-frequency magnetotelluric sounding near Heathcote, Victoria.

,

Sferics used in audio-frequency magnetotellurics (AMT) for shallow conductivity-depth soundings (up to 400 m in a 1000 Ωm half-space at 1.5 kHz) are detected by global lightning networks, which catalogue the time and location of up to four million lightning strikes per day. Passive AMT surveys do not use source information, but rather assume that global lightning activity provides sufficient signal if data are acquired for long enough. This assumption not only limits survey productivity, but can also result in poor signal-to-noise ratios (S/N), particularly at dead-band frequencies (1.5–5 kHz). To increase S/N and survey productivity, we used lightning network data as a proxy for direct measurement of sferic source information. We carried out a Global Positioning System (GPS) synchronised AMT survey, and for each lightning strike in the catalogue we modelled earth-ionosphere waveguide propagation to accurately predict arrival time for every predicted sferic in our time series data. We extracted a window of data around each predicted sferic and stored these time series into a structured database with associated lightning network data, such as lightning peak current, polarity and geographical coordinates. Two examples from our sferic database show that lightning network data are accurate enough to predict amplitude and polarisation of sferics at our survey site. For large lightning peak current, we observed a strong correlation between source proximity and increased S/N, particularly at dead-band frequencies, which often correlate to induction scales pertinent to mineral exploration. Our findings establish an interconnected relationship between lightning network data and lightning sourced fields, introducing known source AMT.

]
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG16163
2018-08-01
2026-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abramowitz, M., and Stegun, I. A., 1964, Handbook of mathematical functions: with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables: Courier Corporation.
  2. Auger, F., Flandrin, P., Gonçalvès, P., and Lemoine, O., 1996, Time-frequency toolbox: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.
  3. Chave, A. D., and Jones, A. G., 2012, The magnetotelluric method: theory and practice: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Christian H. J. Blakeslee R. J. Boccippio D. J. Boeck W. L. Buechler D. E. Driscoll K. T. Goodman S. J. Hall J. M. Koshak W. J. Mach D. M. Stewart M. F. 2003 Global frequency and distribution of lightning as observed from space by the Optical Transient Detector: Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 108 ACL 4–1 ACL 4–15 10.1029/2002JD002347
    https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002347 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chronis T. Koshak W. McCaul E. 2016 Why do oceanic negative cloud-to-ground lightning exhibit larger peak current values?: Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 121 4049 4068 10.1002/2015JD024129
    https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024129 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cummins K. L. Murphy M. J. 2009 An overview of lightning locating systems: history, techniques, and data uses, with an in-depth look at the US NLDN: IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility 51 499 518 10.1109/TEMC.2009.2023450
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMC.2009.2023450 [Google Scholar]
  7. Garcia X. Jones A. G. 2002 Atmospheric sources for audio-magnetotelluric (AMT) sounding: Geophysics 67 448 458 10.1190/1.1468604
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1468604 [Google Scholar]
  8. Garcia X. Jones A. G. 2005 A new methodology for the acquisition and processing of audio-magnetotelluric (AMT) data in the AMT dead band: Geophysics 70 G119 G126 10.1190/1.2073889
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2073889 [Google Scholar]
  9. Groom R. W. Bailey R. C. 1989 Decomposition of magnetotelluric impedance tensors in the presence of local three‐dimensional galvanic distortion: Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 94 1913 1925 10.1029/JB094iB02p01913
    https://doi.org/10.1029/JB094iB02p01913 [Google Scholar]
  10. Hope M. Andersson S. 2016 The discovery and geophysical response of the Atlántida Cu–Au porphyry deposit, Chile: Exploration Geophysics 47 237 247 10.1071/EG15094
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG15094 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hu X. Peng R. Wu G. Wang W. Huo G. Han B. 2013 Mineral exploration using CSAMT data: application to Longmen region metallogenic belt, Guangdong Province, China: Geophysics 78 B111 B119 10.1190/geo2012‑0115.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2012-0115.1 [Google Scholar]
  12. Huang E. Williams E. Boldi R. Heckman S. Lyons W. Taylor M. Nelson T. Wong C. 1999 Criteria for sprites and elves based on Schumann resonance observations: Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 104 16943 16964 10.1029/1999JD900139
    https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900139 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ishaq M. Jones D. L. 1977 Method of obtaining radiowave propagation parameters for the Earth-ionosphere duct at ELF: Electronics Letters 13 254 255 10.1049/el:19770184
    https://doi.org/10.1049/el:19770184 [Google Scholar]
  14. Karney C. F. F. 2013 Algorithms for geodesics: Journal of Geodesy 87 43 55 10.1007/s00190‑012‑0578‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-012-0578-z [Google Scholar]
  15. Legault, J. M., Wijns, C., Izarra, C., and Plastow, G., 2016, The Balboa ZTEM Cu-Mo-Au porphyry discovery at Cobre Panama: 25th ASEG International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, 361–366.
  16. Macnae, J., 2012, Design and testing of ARMIT magnetic field sensors for EM systems: 22nd ASEG Geophysical Conference, Extended Abstracts, 1–4.
  17. Neukirch M. Garcia X. 2014 Nonstationary magnetotelluric data processing with instantaneous parameter: Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 119 1634 1654 10.1002/2013JB010494
    https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JB010494 [Google Scholar]
  18. Nickolaenko, A. P., and Hayakawa, M., 2002, Resonances in the Earth-ionosphere cavity: Springer Science & Business Media.
  19. Nickolaenko A. P. Hayakawa M. Hobara Y. 2010 Q-bursts: natural ELF radio transients: Surveys in Geophysics 31 409 425 10.1007/s10712‑010‑9096‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-010-9096-9 [Google Scholar]
  20. Rakov, V. A., and Uman, M. A., 2003, Lightning: physics and effects: Cambridge University Press.
  21. Said, R., and Murphy, M., 2016, GLD360 upgrade: performance analysis and applications: 24th International Lightning Detection Conference & 6th International Lightning Meteorology Conference, San Diego, California, 18–21 April 2016, 1–8.
  22. Said R. K. Inan U. S. Cummins K. L. 2010 Long-range lightning geolocation using a VLF radio atmospheric waveform bank: Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 115 D23108
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Said R. K. Cohen M. B. Inan U. S. 2013 Highly intense lightning over the oceans: estimated peak currents from global GLD360 observations: Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 118 6905 6915 10.1002/jgrd.50508
    https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50508 [Google Scholar]
  24. Sato M. Takahashi Y. Yoshida A. Adachi T. 2008 Global distribution of intense lightning discharges and their seasonal variations: Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 41 234011 10.1088/0022‑3727/41/23/234011
    https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/41/23/234011 [Google Scholar]
  25. Smiarowski A. Macnae J. 2013 Detection of a perfect conductor with an airborne electromagnetic system: The Gemini Field Test: Geophysics 78 E249 E259 10.1190/geo2012‑0469.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2012-0469.1 [Google Scholar]
  26. Szarka L. 1988 Geophysical aspects of man-made electromagnetic noise in the earth – a review: Surveys in Geophysics 9 287 318 10.1007/BF01901627
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01901627 [Google Scholar]
  27. Thomson D. J. 1982 Spectrum estimation and harmonic analysis: Proceedings of the IEEE 70 1055 1096 10.1109/PROC.1982.12433
    https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1982.12433 [Google Scholar]
  28. Ushio T. Wu T. Yoshida S. 2015 Review of recent progress in lightning and thunderstorm detection techniques in Asia: Atmospheric Research 154 89 102 10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  29. Wait J. 1991 Diffraction of VLF radio waves by polar ice caps: Electronics Letters 27 1030 1032 10.1049/el:19910641
    https://doi.org/10.1049/el:19910641 [Google Scholar]
  30. Wait, J., 2012, Geo-electromagnetism: Elsevier.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG16163
Loading
/content/journals/10.1071/EG16163
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): electromagnetics; lightning; magnetotellurics

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error