1887
Volume 49, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

[

Airborne magnetic surveys over rugged topography generate noticeable magnetic signatures that are likely equivalent in amplitude with the signal of geological interest. Synthetic models demonstrate that this magnetic terrain effect has the same wavelength as the topography and cannot be overcome by drape flying. The magnetic terrain effect amplifies negative and positive magnetic signals over steep valleys and ridges, respectively. These magnetic artefacts may induce incorrect geological interpretation of magnetic features. In order to remove these spurious signals, we develop a semiquantitative methodology based on 3D magnetic modelling of the topographic effect. Observed total magnetic field is then corrected by subtracting the synthetic field related to the topographic effect. The key element in this approach is the appropriate estimate of the magnetisation associated with the topography, which is especially difficult to determine in areas characterised by rugged terrain. We estimate the magnetic signal related to the topographic effect by: (1) filtering the magnetic data based on the wavelength band in which magnetic and topographic data show maximum coherency, (2) inverting the filtered magnetic data in order to obtain a model of the magnetic susceptibility distribution associated with the topography, and finally (3) calculating the magnetic signal response of the topography-related susceptibility model. We successfully tested this approach in the Río Blanco-Los Bronces and El Teniente porphyry copper districts (Andes of Central Chile), which are characterised by rugged topography and the presence of highly magnetised volcanic rocks. Validation is achieved by comparing the magnetic response over zones with a good geological and petrophysical knowledge. In these examples, the topography-corrected magnetic data show the distribution of geological units and susceptibility better than the non-corrected magnetic data.

,

This paper describes a semiquantitative, 3D-modelling based methodology that has been developed to remove topographic effects on magnetic data. Through synthetic and real cases in the Andes, we show that airborne magnetic surveys over rugged topography generate magnetic signatures that could be of similar amplitude with the signal of geological interest.

]
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG17016
2018-08-01
2026-01-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amante, C., and Eakins, B. W., 2009, ETOPO1 1 arc-minute global relief model: procedures, data sources and analysis: US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service, National Geophysical Data Center, Marine Geology and Geophysics Division, Colorado.
  2. Astudillo N. Roperch P. Townley B. Arriagada C. Chauvin A. 2010 Magnetic polarity zonation within the El Teniente copper-molybdenum porphyry deposit, central Chile: Mineralium Deposita 45 23 41 10.1007/s00126‑009‑0256‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00126-009-0256-0 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bansal A. R. Dimri V. P. 2014 Modelling of magnetic data for scaling geology: Geophysical Prospecting 62 385 396 10.1111/1365‑2478.12094
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12094 [Google Scholar]
  4. Carretier S. Goddéris Y. Delannoy T. Rouby D. 2014 Mean bedrock-to-saprolite conversion and erosion rates during mountain growth and decline: Geomorphology 209 39 52 10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.11.025
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.11.025 [Google Scholar]
  5. Carter G. Knapp C. Nuttall A. 1973 Estimation of the magnitude-squared coherence function via overlapped fast Fourier transform processing: IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics 21 337 344 10.1109/TAU.1973.1162496
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TAU.1973.1162496 [Google Scholar]
  6. Charrier, R., Pinto, L., and Rodríguez, M. P., 2007, Tectonostatigraphic evolution of the Andean Orogen in Chile, in T. Moreno, and W. Gibbons, eds., The geology of Chile: The Geological Society, London, 21–114.
  7. Fedi M. Pilkington M. 2012 Understanding imaging methods for potential field data: Geophysics 77 G13 G24 10.1190/geo2011‑0078.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011-0078.1 [Google Scholar]
  8. Goguitchaichvili A. Chauvin A. Roperch P. Prévot M. Aguirre L. Vergara M. 2000 Palaeomagnetism of the Miocene Farellones formation (Chile): Geophysical Journal International 140 357 373 10.1046/j.1365‑246x.2000.00022.x
    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.2000.00022.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Grauch V. J. S. Campbell D. 1984 Does draping aeromagnetic data reduce terrain-induced effects? Geophysics 49 75 80 10.1190/1.1441563
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441563 [Google Scholar]
  10. Gupta V. K. Fitzpatrick M. M. 1971 Evaluation of terrain effects in ground magnetic surveys: Geophysics 36 582 589 10.1190/1.1440193
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440193 [Google Scholar]
  11. Li Y. Oldenburg D. 1996 3-D inversion of magnetic data: Geophysics 61 394 408 10.1190/1.1443968
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443968 [Google Scholar]
  12. Mahmoodi O. Smith R. S. Spicer B. 2017 Using constrained inversion of gravity and magnetic field to produce a 3D litho-prediction model: Geophysical Prospecting 10.1111/1365‑2478.12484
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12484 [Google Scholar]
  13. Pedersen L. B. 1991 Relations between potential fields and some equivalent sources: Geophysics 56 961 971 10.1190/1.1443129
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443129 [Google Scholar]
  14. Pilkington M. Keating P. B. 2009 The utility of potential field enhancements for remote predictive mapping: Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 35 S1 S11
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Pilkington M. Thurston J. 2001 Draping corrections for aeromagnetic data: line- versus grid-based approaches: Exploration Geophysics 32 95 101 10.1071/EG01095
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG01095 [Google Scholar]
  16. Piquer J. Castelli J. C. Charrier R. Yañez G. 2010 El Cenozoico del alto Rio Teno, Cordillera Principal, Chile central: estratigrafia, plutonismo y su relacion con estructuras profundas: Andean Geology 37 32 53
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Schiffler M. Queitsch M. Stolz R. Meyer H.-G. Kukowski N. 2017 Application of Hilbert-like transforms for enhanced processing of full tensor magnetic gradient data: Geophysical Prospecting 10.1111/1365‑2478.12518
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12518 [Google Scholar]
  18. Sernageomin, 2003, Mapa Geológico de Chile escala 1 : 1.000.000. Servicio Nacional de Geología y Minería.
  19. Spector, A., 1968, Spectral analysis of aeromagnetic maps: Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto.
  20. Stolz, R., Schiffler, M., Queitsch, M., Schönau, T., Schmelz, M., Goepel, A., Meyer, U., Kukowski, N., and Meyer, H.-G., 2015, Why bother about gradients? – a SQUID based full tensor magnetic gradiometer for mineral exploration: DGG/EAGE Workshop on Airborne Geophysics, Hannover, Germany, pp. 28–33.
  21. Tensor Research, 2016, ModelVision v15.0 user guide: Tensor Research.
  22. UBC Geophysical Inversion Facility (UBC-GIF), 2013, A Program Library for Forward Modelling and Inversion of Magnetic Data over 3D Structures, version 5.0.
  23. Ugalde H. Morris W. A. 2008 An assessment of topographic effects on airborne and ground magnetic data: The Leading Edge 27 76 79 10.1190/1.2831683
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2831683 [Google Scholar]
  24. Wang J. Meng X. Li F. 2015 A computationally efficient scheme for the inversion of large scale potential field data: application to synthetic and real data: Computers & Geosciences 85 102 111 10.1016/j.cageo.2015.09.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2015.09.005 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1071/EG17016
Loading
/content/journals/10.1071/EG17016
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): magnetics; mining geophysics; potential fields; South America

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error