1887
Volume 49, Issue 6
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

[

Staggered grid finite difference (FD) methods are widely used to synthesise seismograms theoretically, and are also the basis of reverse time migration and full waveform inversion. Grid dispersion is one of the key problems for FD methods. It is desirable to have a FD scheme which can accelerate wave equation simulation while still preserving high accuracy. In this paper, we propose a totally new staggered grid FD scheme which uses different staggered grid FD operators for different first order spatial derivatives in the first order acoustic wave equation. We determine the FD coefficient in the space domain with the least-squares method. The dispersion analysis and numerical simulation demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed method.

,

In this paper, we propose a new finite difference (FD) scheme which uses different staggered grid FD operators for different first order spatial derivatives in the first order acoustic wave equation. The dispersion analysis and numerical simulation demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed method.

]
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG17088
2018-11-01
2026-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bohlen T. Wittkamp F. 2016 Three-dimensional viscoelastic time-domain finite-difference seismic modeling using the staggered Adams–Bashforth time integrator:Geophysical Journal International2041781178810.1093/gji/ggv546
    https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv546 [Google Scholar]
  2. Chu C. Stoffa P. L. 2012 Determination of finite-difference weights using scaled binomial windows:Geophysics77W17W2610.1190/geo2011‑0336.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011-0336.1 [Google Scholar]
  3. Di Bartolo L. Dors C. Mansur W. J. 2012 A new family of finite-difference schemes to solve the heterogeneous acoustic wave equation:Geophysics77T187T19910.1190/geo2011‑0345.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011-0345.1 [Google Scholar]
  4. Etemadsaeed L. Moczo P. Kristek J. Ansari A. Kristekova M. 2016 A no-cost improved velocity–stress staggered-grid finite-difference scheme for modelling seismic wave propagation:Geophysical Journal International20748151110.1093/gji/ggw287
    https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggw287 [Google Scholar]
  5. Liang W. Q. Yang C. C. Wang Y. F. Liu H. W. 2013 Acoustic wave equation modeling with new time-space domain finite difference operators:Chinese Journal of Geophysics5684085010.1002/cjg2.20076
    https://doi.org/10.1002/cjg2.20076 [Google Scholar]
  6. Liu Y. Sen M. K. 2011 Scalar wave equation modeling with time-space domain dispersion-relation-based staggered-grid finite-difference schemes:Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America10114115910.1785/0120100041
    https://doi.org/10.1785/0120100041 [Google Scholar]
  7. Ren Z. Liu Y. 2015 Acoustic and elastic modeling by optimal time-space-domain staggered-grid finite-difference schemes:Geophysics80T17T4010.1190/geo2014‑0269.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2014-0269.1 [Google Scholar]
  8. Ren Z. Liu Y. Sen M. K. 2017 Least-squares reverse time migration in elastic media:Geophysical Journal International2081103112510.1093/gji/ggw443
    https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggw443 [Google Scholar]
  9. Robertsson J. O. Blanch J. O. Symes W. W. 1994 Viscoelastic finite-difference modeling:Geophysics591444145610.1190/1.1443701
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443701 [Google Scholar]
  10. Tan S. Huang L. 2014aA staggered-grid finite-difference scheme optimized in the time-space domain for modeling scalar-wave propagation in geophysical problems:Journal of Computational Physics27661363410.1016/j.jcp.2014.07.044
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2014.07.044 [Google Scholar]
  11. Tan S. Huang L. 2014bAn efficient finite-difference method with high-order accuracy in both time and space domains for modelling scalar-wave propagation:Geophysical Journal International1971250126710.1093/gji/ggu077
    https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu077 [Google Scholar]
  12. Virieux J. 1984 SH-wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity-stress finite-difference method:Geophysics491933194210.1190/1.1441605
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441605 [Google Scholar]
  13. Virieux J. 1986 P-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity-stress finite-difference method:Geophysics5188990110.1190/1.1442147
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442147 [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang Y. Liang W. Nashed Z. Li X. Liang G. Yang C. 2014 Seismic modeling by optimizing regularized staggered-grid finite-difference operators using a time-space-domain dispersion-relationship-preserving method:Geophysics79T277T28510.1190/geo2014‑0078.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2014-0078.1 [Google Scholar]
  15. Wu Z. Alkhalifah T. 2014 The optimized expansion based low-rank method for wavefield extrapolation:Geophysics79T51T6010.1190/geo2013‑0174.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2013-0174.1 [Google Scholar]
  16. Yan H. Liu Y. 2013 Acoustic VTI modeling and pre-stack reverse-time migration based on the time-space domain staggered-grid finite-difference method:Journal of Applied Geophysics90415210.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.12.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.12.008 [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhang J. H. Yao Z. X. 2013 Optimized finite-difference operator for broadband seismic wave modeling:Geophysics78A13A1810.1190/geo2012‑0277.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2012-0277.1 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1071/EG17088
Loading
/content/journals/10.1071/EG17088
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error