1887
Volume 49, Issue 5
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

[

The Marine Vibrator Joint Industry Project (MVJIP), sponsored by Shell, Total and ExxonMobil, has been ongoing for four years. During this time significant progress has been made towards developing fully commercial marine vibrators. We begin by describing the history of, and need for, marine vibrator development, including the successes and shortcomings of the technology development before the MVJIP. Following this, we discuss the motivation for initiating the MVJIP, including the specifications required and initial phases of the project. Next, we move on to the vendors that are developing the different options. For each of the three vendors, we shall discuss their background with the technology, the type of technology being developed and their results to date. After discussing the vendors, we shall move on to the impact the MVJIP has had on the commercial marine vibrator industry. Finally, we will discuss our experiences to date and conclude with further work and the way forward for the project.

,

The Marine Vibrator Joint Industry Project (MVJIP), sponsored by Shell, Total and ExxonMobil, has been ongoing for four years. This paper discusses the history, motivation, technology and latest developments from the project.

]
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG17093
2018-10-01
2026-01-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anonymous, 1987, MULTIPULSE Source makes waves for Western: Western Profile [Web document]: Accessed 15 September 2017. Available at http://media.seg.org/documents/WesternProfile/1987SummerWesternProfile.pdf
  2. Anonymous, 2017, APS Company Profile: Applied Physical Sciences [Web document]: Accessed 12 April 2017. Available at https://www.aphysci.com/Content/Company_Profile.asp
  3. Bird, J. M., Peacock, J. H., and Walker, L. J., 1984, Development of a hydraulic transducer for marine seismic: 54th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 825–826.
  4. Caldwell J. Dragoset W. H. 2000 A brief overview of seismic air-gun arrays:The Leading Edge19898902 10.1190/1.1438744
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1438744 [Google Scholar]
  5. Dragoset, W. H., 1988, Marine vibrators and the Doppler effect: 58th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 75–78.
  6. Dragoset W. H. 1990 Airgun array specs: A tutorial:The Leading Edge92432 10.1190/1.1439671
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1439671 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dragoset W. H. Hargreaves N. Larner K. 1987 Airgun source instabilities:Geophysics5212291251 10.1190/1.1442385
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442385 [Google Scholar]
  8. Haldorsen, J., Desler, J. F., and Chu, D., 1985, Use of vibrators in a marine seismic source: 55th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 509–511.
  9. Halliday, D., Laws, R., and Özbek, A., 2017, Phase sequencing, marine vibrators, and high-multiplicity simultaneous sources: 87th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 57–61.
  10. Houston, M. H., 1987, Spectral shaping with a digital marine vibratory source: 57th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 208–210.
  11. Johnson, G. R., Thompson, I., and Walker, L. J., 1988, The GECO marine vibrator system: 58th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 71–74.
  12. LGL and MAI, 2011, Environmental Assessment of Marine Vibroseis: Joint Industry Programme, E&P Sound and Marine Life International Association of Oil and Gas Producers [Web document]: Accessed 20 April 2017. Available at http://www.marineacoustics.com/pdf/EnvironmentalAssessmentOfMarineVibroseis.pdf
  13. Morozov, A. K., Webb, D. C., Chiu, C. S., Worcester, P. F., Dzieciuch, M. A., Sagen, H., Guigné, J. Y., and Altshuler, T. W., 2016, High efficient tunable sound sources for ocean and bottom tomography, 15 years of operating history: OCEANS 2016 MTS/IEEE Monterey, 1–10.
  14. Neill, E., Pessoa, M. E., and Kean, A., 2002, Optimizing air gun arrays for shallow water and transition zone seismic acquisition: 72nd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 67–69.
  15. Potter, G., Mann, A., Jenkerson, M., and Rodriguez, J. M., 1997, Comparison of marine vibrator, dynamite and airgun sources in the transition zone: 59th Conference and Technical Exhibition, EAGE, Expanded Abstracts, 132–133.
  16. Qi, C., and Hilterman, F., 2016, Removal of Doppler effects from marine vibrator OBN seismic: 86th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 183–187.
  17. Smith, J. G., and Jenkerson, M. R., 1998, Acquiring and processing marine vibrator data in the transition zone: 68th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 136–139.
  18. Tenghamn R. 2006 An electrical marine vibrator with a flextensional shell:Exploration Geophysics37286291 10.1071/EG06286
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG06286 [Google Scholar]
  19. Ursin-Holm, B., Tengham, R., Fritsvold, R., and Osterholt, P. A., 1991, Development of a new improved marine vibrator based on Terfenol D: 61st Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 796–799
/content/journals/10.1071/EG17093
Loading
/content/journals/10.1071/EG17093
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): acquisition; marine; oil and gas exploration; seismic exploration; sources; vibroseis

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error