1887
Volume 10, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

The topographic anomaly dominates over contributions from subsurface bodies whose dimensions are comparable to the topography. Its removal from airborne and marine data is made doubly difficult by variations in topographic density over large distances, and the non-proximity of the observations to the anomaly sources. The smoothing inherent in non-proximity data makes the separation of anomaly components difficult, resulting in a high degree of ambiguity.

Various automatic methods of dealing with the topographic anomaly are discussed. None of them can restore gradients already missing in non-proximity data, and none are valid for general application. The blending of anomaly components, which can be easily demonstrated, means that there can be no general form of Nettleton's density profiling concept.

There is no general panacea for the topography problem Observing as close to the ground as possible will give the best results and multiple density profiling, based on Nettleton's principle is essential for understanding the ambiguity involved. Regardless of whether topographic density varies laterally or not, a set of multiple-density Bouguer profiles is the only known means of conveying the ambiguity resulting from the interaction between the topographic anomaly and other anomalies. This factor mitigates against contour analysis, where density profiles cannot be used.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG979164
1979-06-01
2026-01-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ANFILOFF, W., 1976: Automated density profiling over elongate topographic features, BMR Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics, v. 1, no. 1, p. 57-61.
  2. BHATTACHARYYA, B.K. and CHAN, K.C. 1977: Reduction of magnetic and gravity data acquired in a region of high topographic relief, Geophysics, v. 42, p. 1411 -1430.
  3. CHINNERY, M.A., 1961: Terrain corrections for airborne gravity gradient measurements: Geophysics, v. 26, p. 480-489.
  4. FLAVELLE, A.J., and ANFILOFF, W., 1976: Non-standard gravity anomalies over sedimentary structures: Aust. Petrol. Expl. Assoc. Journal, v. 16, p. 117-121.
  5. GRANT, F.S., & ELSAHARTY, A.F., 1962, Bouguer gravity corrections using a variable density. Geophysics, v. 28, p. 616-626.
  6. HAMMER, S., 1971, Vertical attenuation of anomalies in airborne gravimetry. Geophysics, v. 36, p. 867-877.
  7. HAMMER, S., 1974, Topographic and terrain corrections for airborne gravimetry: Geophysics, v. 39, p. 537-542.
  8. HAMMER, S., 1976, Topographic corrections for gradients in airborne gravimetry: Geophysics, v. 41, p. 1346-1352.
  9. MALZAC, J., and ROUSSEAU, A., 1978: A “processing density” to calculate marine Bouguer gravity free of topographic variations in case of unknown bottom density: Geophysical Prospecting, v. 26, p. 853-867.
  10. NETTLETON, L.L., 1939: Determination of density for the reduction of gravimeter observations. Geophysics, v. 4, p. 176-183.
  11. SIEGERT, A.J.F., 1942: Determination of the Bouguer correction constant: Geophysics, v. 7, p. 29-34.
  12. VAJK, R., 1956, Bouguer corrections with varying surface density, Geophysics, v. 21, p. 1004-1020.
  13. WATTS, A.B., 1978: An analysis of isostasy in the world's oceans. 1. Hawaiian-Emperor seamount chain, Journ. Geophys Res., v. 83, no. B12, p. 5989-6004.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG979164
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error