Airborne magnetic susceptibility mapping

Joao B. C. Silva; Gerald W. Hohmann

doi:10.1071/EG984001

ISSN: 0812-3985
E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Airborne magnetic susceptibility mapping
Authors Joao B. C. Silva^a and Gerald W. Hohmann^b
View Affiliations Hide Affiliations

^a NcGG-UFPa, , Caixa Postal 1611, 66000 Belem, Para, , Brazil ^b Geology and Geophysics Department, University of Utah, , Salt Lake City, , Utah, 84112, , USA
Publisher: Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Source: Exploration Geophysics, Volume 15, Issue 1, Mar 1984, p. 1 - 13
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/EG984001
- Published online: 01 Mar 1984

Abstract

This paper describes an automated, three-dimensional, multibody aeromagnetic interpretation technique, which operates on the total intensity map by means of straightforward operations. The magnetic field is reduced to the pole, and the magnetization of an equivalent layer of poles is computed at discrete points by a linear inversion procedure. Assuming induced magnetization only, the computer magnetization map can be transformed into an apparent susceptibility map by dividing it by the total intensity of the geomagnetic field.

The apparent susceptibility map will approximate the true variations in susceptibility if the magnetic sources have vertical sides, flat horizontal tops lying at the same depth, and bottom at infinity. In this case the horizontal outline of the sources is obtained. In order to apply this technique to large areas, a stabilization procedure is introduced. Using theoretical data, we analyse the effects of violating some of the above assumptions: uneven top, wrong assumed depth to the top, and finite thickness. We have found that, in general, the technique produces reasonable estimates of the magnetic susceptibility and a rough outline of the sources.

We applied the technique to field data from three different geological settings in the USA. However, the method may be particularly applicable in Australia, where the topography is usually gentle. Our results show that the apparent susceptibility map often provides a good qualitative picture of the actual susceptibility distribution, which can be used to select favourable sites for detailed anomaly modeling. However, rough topography presents a serious obstacle, and the ambiguity involving depth and susceptibility cannot be resolved without independent geophysical or geological information.

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG984001

1984-03-01

2026-01-17

From This Site

/content/journals/10.1071/EG984001

dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword

-contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution

10

5

Full text loading...

References

Al-Chalabi, M. (1971), ‘Some studies relating to non-uniqueness in gravity and magnetic inverse problems’. Geophysics 36, 835-55.
Baranov, W. (1975), ‘Potential Fields and their Transformations in Applied Geophysics’, Gebruder Borntraeger, Berlin.
Bhattacharyya, B. K. (1964), ‘Magnetic anomalies due to prism-shaped bodies with arbitrary polarization’. Geophysics 29, 517-31.
Bhattacharyya, B. K. (1965), ‘Two-dimensional harmonic analysis as a tool for magnetic interpretation’. Geophysics 30, 829-57.
Bhattacharyya, B. K. (1980), ‘A generalized multibody model for inversion of magnetic anomalies’. Geophysics 45, 255-70.
Bott, M. H. P. (1967), ‘Solution of the linear inverse problem in magnetic interpretation with application to oceanic magnetic anomalies’, Geophys. J. ft. Astr. Soc. 13, 313-23.
Brant, A. A. (1966), ‘Geophysics in the exploration for Arizona porphyry coppers’, in S. R. Titley and C. L. Hicks (eds) Geology of the Porphyry Copper Deposits, Southwestern North America’, Univ. Arizona Press, Tuscon.
Carlson, J. E. & Mabey, D. R. (1963), ‘Gravity and aeromagnetic map of the Ely area. White Pine County, Nevada’, U.S. Geological Survey Map GP-392.
Clark, D. A. (1983), ‘Comments on magnetic petrophysics’. Bull. Aust. Soc. Explor. Geophys. 14, 49-62.
Dampney, C. N. G. (1969), ‘The equivalent source technique’. Geophysics 39, 39-53.
Emilia, D. A. (1973), ‘Equivalent sources used as an analytic base for processing total magnetic field profiles’. Geophysics 38, 339-48.
Fuller, B. D. (1967), ‘Two-dimensional frequency analysis and design of grid operators’, in Mining Geophysics, Vol. 2, pp. 658-708, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa.
Grant, F. S. (1973), ‘The magnetic susceptibility mapping method for interpreting aeromagnetic surveys’, paper presented at 43rd SEG meeting, Mexico City.
Gunn, P. J. (1972), ‘Application of Wiener filters to transformations of gravity and magnetic fields’, Geophys. Prosp. 20, 860-71.
Gunn, P. J. (1975), ‘Linear transformations of gravity and magnetic fields’, Geophys. Prosp. 23, 300-12.
Hartman, R. R., Teskey, D. J. & Friedberg, J. L., 1971, ‘A system for rapid digital aeromagnetic interpretation’. Geophysics 36,891-918.
Hoerl, A. E. & Kennard, R. W. (1970a), ‘Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems’, Technometrics 12,55-67.
Hoerl, A. E. & Kennard, R. W. (1970b), ‘Ridge regression: Applications to nonorthogonal problems’, Technometrics 12, 69-82.
Kleinkopf, M. D., Witkind, I. J. & Keefer, W. R. (1972), ‘Aeromagnetic, Bouguer gravity, and generalized geologic maps of the central part of the Little Belt Mountains, Montana’, U.S. Geological Survey Map GP 837.
Marquardt, D. W. (1970), ‘Generalized inverses, ridge regression, biased linear estimation, and nonlinear estimation’, Technometrics 12, 591-612.
Mayhew, M. A., Johnson, B. D. & Langel, R. A. (1980), ‘An equivalent source model of the satellite-altitude magnetic anomaly field over Australia’, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 51, 189-98.
Naudy, H. (1971), ‘Automatic determination of depth on aero-magnetic profiles’. Geophysics 36, 717-22.
O’Brien, D, (1972), ‘CompuDepth, a new method for depth-to-basement computation’, paper presented at 42nd SEG Meeting, Anaheim, California, 29 November.
Peters, L. J. (1949), ‘The direct approach to magnetic interpretation and its practical application’. Geophysics 14, 290-319.
Reford, M. S. (1980), ‘Magnetic method’. Geophysics 45, 1640-58.
Roy, A. (1962), ‘Ambiguity in geophysical interpretation’. Geophysics 27, 90-9.
Rudman, A. J. Mead, J., Whaley, J. F. & Blakely, R. F. (1971), ‘Geophysical analysis in Central Indiana using potential field continuation’. Geophysics 36, 878-90.
Teskey, D. J. (1978), ‘Design for a semi-automated three-dimensional interpretation system for potential field data’, Ph.D. thesis, McGill University.
Werner, S. (1953), ‘Interpretation of magnetic anomalies of sheetlike bodies’, Sveriges Geologiska Undersokning, Ser. C. Arsbok43, N: o 6.
Whitehill, D. E. (1973), ‘Automated interpretation of magnetic anomalies using the vertical prism model’. Geophysics 38, 1070-87.

/content/journals/10.1071/EG984001

Article Type: Research Article

Keyword(s): airborne magnetics; automated interpretation; magnetic susceptibility

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

- A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys
  
  Authors M.H. Loke, Ian Acworth and Torleif Dahlin
- Reverse-Time Migration using the Poynting Vector
  
  Authors Kwangjin Yoon and Kurt J. Marfurt
- SkyTEM–a New High-resolution Helicopter Transient Electromagnetic System
  
  Authors K. I. Sorensen and Esben Auken
- An overview of a highly versatile forward and stable inverse algorithm for airborne, ground-based and borehole electromagnetic and electric data
  
  Authors Esben Auken, Anders Vest Christiansen, Casper Kirkegaard, Gianluca Fiandaca, Cyril Schamper, Ahmad Ali Behroozmand, Andrew Binley, Emil Nielsen, Flemming Effersø, Niels Bøie Christensen, Kurt Sørensen, Nikolaj Foged and Giulio Vignoli
- The Fast Marching Method: An Effective Tool for Tomographic Imaging and Tracking Multiple Phases in Complex Layered Media
  
  Authors Nicholas Rawlinson and Malcolm Sambridge
- 3-D Analytic Signal in the Interpretation of Total Magnetic Field Data at Low Magnetic Latitudes
  
  Authors Ian N. MacLeod, Keith Jones and Ting Fan Dai
- CMP cross-correlation analysis of multi-channel surface-wave data
  
  Authors Koichi Hayashi and Haruhiko Suzuki
- A new direct non-invasive groundwater detection technology for Australia
  
  Authors M. Schirov, A. Legchenko and G. Creer
- 3D inversion of airborne electromagnetic data using a moving footprint
  
  Authors Leif H. Cox, Glenn A. Wilson and Michael S. Zhdanov
- Notes On Rock Magnetization Characteristics In Applied Geophysical Studies
  
  Authors D. A. Clark and J. B. Emerson
More Less

Airborne magnetic susceptibility mapping

Abstract

Most Read This Month

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed