1887
Volume 18, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

The fixed receiver electromagnetic (FREM) method is the reverse of the fixed transmitter method. The receiver is fixed, the transmitter is moved, and measurements are plotted in profile or plan at the transmitter positions. In drill hole applications the method extends the way in which information can be gathered and provides improved definition of conductive mineralization. In order to predict and interpret anomaly patterns, it is convenient to invoke reciprocity and visualise the receiver as an electromagnetic source, and the transmitter as a signal measurer. Model and field results confirm that a finite conductor causes a dipolar type magnetic field anomaly, which readily gives information on the strike, dip and approximate location of the conductor. However, conductive overburden may also produce a significant down hole electromagnetic response, and a FREM anomaly that is approximately dipolar. It is therefore necessary to identify the overburden effects and perhaps attempt to remove them, before interpretation.

In addition to rules of thumb, a dipole source, and a rectangular current filament source, have been used successfully for interpreting conductor geometry from FREM data. The FREM approach is novel; it complements conventional drill hole electromagnetic survey measurements. A further appreciation of its advantages as well as drawbacks will come from experience.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG987305
1987-06-01
2026-01-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barnett, C. T. (1984)—‘Simple inversion of time-domain electromagnetic data’, Geophysics 49, 925-933.
  2. Dyck, A. V., Bloore, M. and Vallee, M. A. (1980)—‘User manual for programs Plate and Sphere’, Research in Applied Geophysics, n. 14, University of Toronto.
  3. Dyck, A. V. (1981)—‘A method of quantitative interpretation of wideband, drill-hole EM surveys in mineral exploration’, Research in Applied Geophysics, n. 23, University of Toronto.
  4. Holladay, J. S. (1981)—‘Yvesft and Channel: a subroutine package for stable transformation of sparse frequency domain electromagnetic data to the time domain’, Research in Applied Geophysics, n. 17, University of Toronto.
  5. Woods, D. V. (1975)—‘A model study of the Crone borehole pulse electromagnetic (PEM) system’, MSc thesis, Queen’s University, Kingston.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG987305
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): drill hole; electromagnetic; fixed receiver; nickel; reciprocity; sulphides; Western Australia

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error