1887
Volume 19, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Although our understanding of vibrator source characteristics continues to increase, the fundamental issues of signal polarity and phase remain controversial. Improvements in the accuracy of vibrator control have reduced the potential for phase inconsistencies in processed data, but field setup procedures and variations in data processing still create confusion.

This paper describes an experiment comparing a vibrator and two impulsive sources. Downgoing and reflected waveforms from these three sources are analyzed at selected stages in the processing sequence. Emphasis is placed on polarity procedures during data collection and phase considerations during digital processing. Polarity issues are examined in detail.

Downhole tests compare first-arrival energy from dynamite, an ARIS* impulse source, and a 45,000 pounds peak force vibrator. Stacked sections and VSP data recorded using the ARIS source and vibrator over a well are compared to a synthetic seismogram derived from the lithology of the well. The results show that controlling the vibrator ground force permits the polarity of the vibrator signal to be defined consistently with respect to impulsive signals for both downgoing and reflected energy.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG988190
1988-03-01
2026-01-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baeten, G. J. M., Fokkema, J. T. & Ziolkowski, A. M. (1986)—‘Seismic Vibrator Modeling’, presented at the 56th Annual SEG meeting, Houston, Texas.
  2. Kan, T. K., Batzle, M. L. & Gaiser, J. E. (1983)—‘Attenuation measured from VSP: Evidence of frequency-dependent Q’, presented at the 53rd Annual SEG meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.
  3. Sallas, J. J. (1984)—‘Seismic Vibrator Control and the downgoing P-wave’, Geophysics49, 732–740.
  4. Sallas, J. J. (1985)—‘SEG workshop on data acquisition’, Monterey, California.
  5. Thigpen, B. B., Dalby, A. E. & Landrum, R. (1975)—‘Special report of the Subcommittee on Polarity Standards’, Geophysics40, 694–699.
  6. Wason, C. B. & Potts, M. J. (1984)—‘Some salient issues in vibrator data processing’, presented at the 54th Annual SEG meeting, Atlanta, Georgia.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG988190
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error