1887
Volume 21, Issue 3-4
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Gravity investigations in mountainous areas have been traditionally performed along profiles located in the valleys due to the extremely rugged topography. Errors up to 10 mGal can be caused due to fault structures or low density sediments filling the valleys. Gravity stations have therefore to be distributed in a grid system with many stations high up mountain flanks and tops. This station pattern necessitates remarkable changes in measuring techniques and reduction procedures for a gravity survey. In this case the site coordinates are a source for considerable gravity errors besides the station heights, as the accuracy of topographic corrections also depends on the error of station coordinate determination. Topographic corrections have to be performed by high resolution techniques and the radius of the correction area must be extended to 167 km. The gravity effect of lakes and glaciers has also to be considered. The problems are discussed using case histories from the Eastern Alps. The improvements gained by expanded reduction procedures are demonstrated.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG990161
1990-09-01
2026-01-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aric, K., P. Steinhauser (1976). ‘Geophysikalische Untersuchung des Inntaluntergrundes bei Thaur, ostlich von Innsbruck’ Zeitschr. Gletscherkunde u. Glazialgeologie, XII, 1, 37-54.
  2. Bruckl, E., G. Gangl, P. Steinhauser (1971). ‘Die Ergebnisse der seismischen Gletschermessungen am Dachstein im Jahre 1968’ Arb. Zentralanstalt f.Met.u.Geodynamik, Vienna, 9, 1-31.
  3. Bott, M.H.P. (1959). ‘The use of electronic digital computers for the evaluation of gravimetric terrain corrections’ Geophys. Prosp. 7, 45-54.
  4. Cogbill, A.H. (1990). ‘Gravity terrain corrections calculated using digital elevation models’ Geophysics 55, 102-106.
  5. Ehrismann, W., Muller, G., Rosenbach, Q, and Sperlich, N. (1966). ‘Topographic reductions of gravity measurements by the aid of digital computers’ Bolletino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata 8, 1-20.
  6. Gotze, H.J. and Lahmeyer, B. (1988). ‘Application of three dimensional interactive modeling in gravity and magnetics’ Geophysics 53, 1096-1108.
  7. GOtze, H.J., Strunk, S., and Schmidt, S. (1988). ‘Central Andean gravity field and its relation to crustal structures’ In: Lecture Notes in Earth Sience. (Eds.: Bahlburg, Breitkreuz and Giese), Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Vol. 17, 199-208.
  8. Granser, H. (1987). ‘Topographic reduction of gravity measurements by numerical integration of boundary integrals’ Geophys. Prosp. 35, 71-82.
  9. von Frese, R.R.B., Hinze, W.J., Braile, L.W. and Luca, A.J. (1981). ‘Spherical-earth gravity and magnetic anomaly modeling by Gauss-Legend re quadrature integration’ J. Geophys. 49, 234-242.
  10. Kane, M.F. (1962). ‘A comprehensive system of terrain corrections using a digital computer’ Geophysics 27, 455-462.
  11. Ketelaar, A.C.R. (1976). ‘A system for computer-calculation of the terrain correction in gravity surveying’ Geoexploration 14, 57-65.
  12. Meurers, B. (1986). ‘Improvement of terrain corrections by applying numerical integration techniques and bicubic spline interpolation’ Bolletino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata 28, 111/112, 227-234.
  13. Meurers, B. (1988). ‘Accuracy of gravity measurements in mountainous areas’ Unpublished report.
  14. Meurers, B., Ruess, D., and Steinhauser, P. (1987). ‘The Gravimetric Alpine Traverse’ In:‘Geodynamics of the Eastern Alps’ Flu’gel, H. and Faupl, P. (Editors), Deuticke, Vienna, 334-344.
  15. Meurers, B., Steinhauser, P. and Zych, D. (1990). ‘Berechnung der Bougueranomalie im Hochgebirge unter Anwendung eines geologischen Dichtemodells. Jahrb.Geol.Bundesanstalt, Vienna, 1, 99-109.
  16. Nye, J.F. (1952). A comparison between the theoretical and measured long profile of the Unteraar glacier’ J. Glaciol. 2, 103-107.
  17. Plouff, D. (1976). ‘Gravity and magnetic fields of polygonal prisms and application to magnetic terrain corrections’ Geophysics 41, 727-741.
  18. Raoul, V. (1956). ‘Bouguer corrections with varying surface density’ Geophysics 4, 1004-1020.
  19. Ruess, D. (1980). ‘Gravimetrische Untersuchung am Ostrand des Tauernfensters’ Ph.D Thesis, University of Vienna (Austria).
  20. Ruess, D. (1985a). ‘Geléndereduktionen im Hochgebirge mit dem digitalen Gel–ndemodell Osterreichs - Fehlerabsch–tzung am Beispiel Brandhorn’ Ber. Tiefbau Ostalpen, 12, Publ. Zentralanstalt f.Met.u.Geodynamik, Vienna, 298, 169-173.
  21. Ruess, D. (1985b). ‘Berucksichtigung von Wasser- und Eismassen bei der topographischen Reduktion’ Ber. Tiefbau Ostalpen, 12, Publ. Zentralanstalt f.Met.u.Geodynamik, Vienna, 298, 175-177.
  22. Sprenke, K.F. (1989). ‘Efficient terrain corrections: A geostatistical analysis’ Geophysics 54, 1622-1628.
  23. StJohn, V. R. and Green, R. (1967). ‘Topographic and isostatic corrections to gravity surveys in mountainous areas’Geophys. Prosp. 15, 151-162
/content/journals/10.1071/EG990161
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Gravity; gravity errors; high resolution terrain correction; rugged topography

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error