1887
Volume 23, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Conductive regolith represents a geological-noise source which masks the transient EM response of conductive exploration targets in bedrock. Frequent effects are the loss of target response at early times, with a resultant loss of resolution in estimates of target size and depth, and presence of a subtle rather than distinct target response at late times.

Overburden masking can be effectively reduced by computing and stripping the theoretical response of an equivalent layered conductive overburden model from field data. This process enhances subtle signatures attributable to bedrock conductors and improves target resolution by extracting useable TEM signatures at earlier times than is possible with raw data.

Extraction of signatures attributable to deep bedrock targets requires temporal and spatial filtering of the data, followed by Hilbert transformation of vertical-component data to equivalent horizontal components. These processes facilitate identification of the subtle trends attributable to conductive targets below overburden when the processed data is presented either as stacked sections or in plan-view as images.

These enhancement procedures are demonstrated on data from the Eloise copper-gold deposit, near Cloncurry, NW Queensland, which lies below 70 m of highly conductive Mesozoic shales.

© 1992 ASEG
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG992009
1992-03-01
2026-01-17

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1071/EG992009
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Asten, M. W. (1991). ‘A study of galvanic response in the TEM response of conductive ore bodies’. Abstracts of the ASEG 8th Conference, Sydney.
  2. Brescianini, R. F., Asten, M. W., and McLean, N. (1992). ‘Geophysical response of the Eloise Cu-Au deposit, north-west Queensland’. Explor. Geophys.23, this issue.
  3. Eadie, E. T. (1987). ‘The downhole EM response of the Hellyer ore deposit’. Explor. Geophys.18, 255–264.
  4. Encom (1992). ‘Siroex — electromagnetic modelling analysis and display system v. 2.1’. Encom Technology, Sydney.
  5. Erdelyi, A., and Magnus, W. (1954). ‘Table of Integral Transforms, Vol II’. McGraw-Hill.
  6. Fraser, D. C. (1969). ‘Contouring of VLF-EM data’. Geophysics34, 958–967.
  7. Irvine, R. J. (1987). ‘Drill hole TEM surveys at Thalanga, Queensland’. Explor. Geophys.18, 285–293.
  8. Grant, F. S., and West, G. F. (1965). ‘Interpretation theory in applied geophysics’. McGraw-Hill.
  9. Liu, G., and Asten, M. W. (1992). ‘Fast approximate solutions of transient EM response to a target buried beneath a conductive overburden’. Submitted to Geophysics.
  10. McCracken, K. G., Oristaglio, M. L., and Hohmann, G. W. (1986a). ‘A comparison of electromagnetic exploration systems’. Geophysics51, 810–818.
  11. McCracken, K. G., Oristaglio, M. L., and Hohmann, G. W. (1986b). ‘Minimization of noise in electromagnetic exploration systems.’ Geophysics51, 819–832.
  12. McNae, J. (1985). ‘Manual of large-loop EM interpretation’. Lamontagne Geophysics, Kingston, Canada.
  13. McNeill, J. D., Edwards, R. N., and Levy, G. M. (1984). ‘Appropriate calculations of the transient electromagnetic response from buried conductors in a conductive half-space’. Geophysics49, 918–924.
  14. Nabighian, M. N. (1972). ‘The analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section, its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation, Geophysics37, 507–517.
  15. Nabighian, M. N. (1984). ‘Toward a three-dimensional automatic interpretation of potential field data via generalised Hilbert transforms: Fundamental relations’. Geophysics49, 780–786.
  16. Nabighian, M. N., and McNae, J. C. (1991). ‘Time domain EM prospecting methods’ in Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics Vol 2A, Chapter 6, p. 430, by M. N. Nabighian, SEG Tulsa.
  17. Silic, J. (1989). ‘Interpretation of TDEM data using first and second spatial derivative and time-decay analysis’. Explor. Geophys.20, 57–64.
  18. Stanley, J. M., and Green, R. (1976). ‘Gravity gradients and the Interpretation of the truncated plate’. Geophysics41, 1370–1376.
  19. Oristaglio, M. L., and Hohmann, G. W. (1984). ‘Diffusion of EM fields into a two-dimensional earth: a finite difference approach’. Geophysics49, 870–894.
  20. Raiche, A. R (1987). ‘Transient electromagnetic field computations for polygonal loops on layered earths’. Geophysics52, 785–793.
  21. Telford, W. M., Geldart, L. P., Sheriff, R. E., and Keys, D. A. (1976). ‘Applied Geophysics’. Cambridge University Press.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG992009
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Eloise mineral deposit; Hilbert transform; image processing; regolith; stripping; transient EM

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error