1887
Volume 23, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Random noise can cause problems with the interpretation of seismic sections and can degrade the performance of deconvolution, velocity analysis and migration. When the noise occupies the same frequency band as the signal the only way to attenuate the noise is to perform some ‘averaging’ process across adjacent traces. A very successful way of doing this on 2D data is with the method of FX prediction filtering.

This paper describes the advantages that are gained by extending FX spatial prediction filtering for random noise reduction to 3D. First of all we give an outline of spatial prediction filtering in both 2D and 3D, pointing out the detrimental effects of the process on weak events, curved events and faulted events. It is then shown how the true 3D version of the method (which we call FXY prediction) performs better than the 2D version with respect to the above problems, with examples given using synthetic data. We find that FX and FXY filtering are both capable of reducing random noise on 3D data to the same extent, but that FXY is preferable because it gives less distortion of the geology.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG992051
1992-03-01
2026-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Burg, J. P. (1975). ‘Maximum entropy spectral analysis’, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University.
  2. Canales, L. L. (1984). ‘Random noise reduction’. 54th SEG meeting abstracts, 525.
  3. Hornbostel, S. (1991). ‘Spatial prediction filtering in the t-x and f-x domains’. Geophysics56, 2019–2026.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG992051
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): noise attenuation; prediction filtering; Seismic data processing

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error