1887
Volume 23, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

There have recently been substantial developments in the theory and application of the self-potential (SP) technique as it applies to sulphide and other conductive mineralization. The present discussion evaluates the significance of these for the execution and interpretation of SP surveys.

Recent developments include new numerical techniques for modelling the SP phenomenon that incorporate more realistic double-layer sources and take into account the conductivity distribution of the earth. These suggest two main applications for SP surveys. One application concerns the definition of the electrochemically induced double-layer source over the boundary of a mineralized region with known geometry and electrical characteristics. The other more conventional application requires the assumption of the source distribution, and so allows the determination of the electrical and geometrical parameters of the source body.

Recent ideas on the variation of the electrochemical environment within the earth suggest that the mechanism for the generation of mineral self-potentials may not necessarily require the intersection of the source body and the water table. In this case the possibility exists that deep sulphide bodies lying completely below the water table may generate substantial spontaneous potentials. This provides an interesting opportunity for the SP technique in deeply weathered tropical terrains, where both conductive and resistive overburdens can combine to make the application of techniques employing artificial fields problematical.

© 1992 ASEG
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG992141
1992-03-01
2026-01-15

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1071/EG992141
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Becker, A., and Telford, W. M. (1965). ‘Spontaneous polarization studies’. Geophys. Prosp.13, 173–188.
  2. Bolviken, B. (1978). ‘The redox potential field of the earth’. In Ahrens, L. H. (Ed.), Origin and distribution of the elements. Proc. 2nd Symp., Paris Unesco, May 1977. Pergamon Press, New York, N.Y., 649–665.
  3. Bolviken, B., and Logn, O. (1975). ‘An electrochemical model for element distribution around sulphide bodies’. In Elliot, I. L., and Fletcher, W. K. (Eds), Geochemical exploration. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 631–648.
  4. Brant, A. A. (1955). ‘The role of geophysical methods in modern geophysical programs’. Eng. Min. J.156, 25–32.
  5. Bruckshaw, J. M. (1931). ‘Theoretical considerations (of the spontaneous polarization method)’. In Edge, A. B., and Laby, T. H. (Eds), The principles and practice of geophysical prospecting. Cambridge, 242–245.
  6. Corry, C. E. (1985). ‘Spontaneous polarization associated with porphyry sulphide mineralization’. Geophysics50, 1020–1034.
  7. Corwin, R. F. (1989). ‘Data quality for engineering self-potential surveys’. In Merkler, G. P., Militzer, G. P., Hotzl, H., Armbruster, H., and Brauns J. (Eds), Detection of subsurface flow phenomena. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 51–72.
  8. Corwin, R. F., and Hoover, D. B. (1979). ‘The self-potential method in geothermal exploration’. Geophysics44, 226–245.
  9. Eskola, L. and Hongisto, H. (1987). ‘A macroscopic physical model for the self-potential of a sulphide deposit’. Geoexploration24, 219–226.
  10. Fitterman, D. V. (1978). ‘Electrokinetic and magnetic anomalies associated with dilatant regions in a layered earth’. J. geophys. Res.83, 5923–5928.
  11. Furness, P. (1992a). ‘Modelling spontaneous mineralization potentials with a new integral equation’. J. Appl. Geophys. (in press).
  12. Furness, P. (1992b). ‘A reconciliation of mathematical models for spontaneous mineralization potentials’ (in prep.).
  13. Guptasarma, D. (1983). ‘Effect of surface polarization on resistivity modelling’. Geophysics48, 98–106.
  14. Hovdan, H., and Bolviken, B. (1985). ‘Sulphide self potentials in relation to oxygen content in drill-hole water’. Geoexploration23, 387–394.
  15. Kayal, J. R., Datta, S., and Madhusudan, I. C. (1982). ‘Resistance and self-potential logging for copper deposits’. Geophys. Res. Bull.20, 157–161.
  16. Kilty, K. T. (1984). ‘On the origin and interpretation of self-potential anomalies’. Geophys. Prosp.32, 51–62.
  17. Logn, O., and Bolviken, B. (1974). ‘Self potentials at the Joma pyrite deposit, Norway’. Geoexploration 12, 11–28.
  18. Sato, M., and Mooney, H. M. (1960). ‘The electrochemical mechanism of sulphide self-potentials’. Geophysics25, 226–249.
  19. Sill, W. R. (1983). ‘Self-potential modelling from primary flows’. Geophysics48, 76–86.
  20. Vetter, K. J. (1967). ‘Electrochemical kinetics’. Academic Press, New York.
  21. Weigel, M. (1989). ‘Self-potential surveys on waste dumps — theory and practice’. In Merkler, G. P., Militzer, H., Hotzl, H., Armbruster, H., and Brauns, J. (Eds), Detection of subsurface flow phenomena. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 109–120.
  22. Wurmstich, B., and Faber, S. (1989). ‘Long-term self-potential data aquisition and processing’. In Merkler, G. P., Militzer, H., Hotzl, H., Armbruster, H., and Brauns, J. (Eds), Detection of subsurface flow phenomena. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 171–196.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG992141
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): integral equations; mineral self-potentials; Spontaneous mineralization potentials

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error