1887
Volume 23, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Seismoelectric exploration records the electrical (or magnetic) response from a seismic input in order to resolve targets that may not be amenable to other geophysical methods. The latter targets include quartz veins, relatively pure sphalerite and kimberlite.

Various mechanisms have been proposed to explain the conversion of seismic to electromagnetic energy. Of these, piezoelectricity is the most familiar. This paper concentrates on other, less familiar, phenomena. We examine these in the context of four field experiments carried out in various geological settings. These settings are the quartz-ankerite Paymaster vein, near Timmins, Ontario; a road fill at Haney, British Columbia; and at the Mobrun, Quebec, and Sullivan, British Columbia, sulphide mines. The first two illustrate essentially linear conversion processes in which the measured electric field contains frequencies comparable with those in the seismic input. The third and fourth illustrate highly nonlinear processes with high-frequency impulsive responses.

Brief descriptions are given of the experimental techniques that were used, and representative results are presented. In all cases, the measurements give information about targets of interest, and therefore suggest that seismoelectric techniques deserve more attention than has been afforded them in the past.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG992201
1992-03-01
2026-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Blau, L. W., and Statham, L. (1936). ‘Method and apparatus for seismic-electric prospecting’, U.S. Patent No. 2 054 067
  2. Cress, G. O., Brady, B. T., and Rowell, G. A. (1987). ‘Sources of electromagnetic radiation from fracture of rock samples in the laboratory’. Geophys. Res. Lett. 14, 331-334.
  3. Ivanov, A. G. (1940). ‘The seismoelectric effect of the second kind’. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Geograf. i Geofiz. 4, 699-727. (In Russian. English translation is available from the US Library of Congress.)
  4. Martner, S. T., and Sparks, N. R. (1959). ‘The electroseismic effect’. Geophysics24, 297-308.
  5. O’Keefe, S. G., and Thiel, D. V. (1991). ‘Electromagnetic emissions during rock blasting’. Geophys. Res. Lett. 18, 889-892.
  6. Russell, R. D., Maxwell, M., Butler, K. E., and Kepic, A. W. (in press). ‘Electromagnetic responses from seismically excited targets A: piezoelectric phenomena at Humboldt, Australia’. Explor. Geophys. 23 (this volume).
  7. Sobolev, G. A., Demin, V. M., Los, V. F., and Maybuk, Yu. Ya. (1982). ‘Study of the electromagnetic radiation of rocks containing semiconductor and piezoelectric minerals’. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Geofiz. 11, 72-86. (In Russian. English translation in Izvestiya, Earth Physics, American Geophysical Union, 18, 888-897, 1982.)
  8. Sobolev, G. A., Demin, V. M., Narod, B. B., and Whaite, P. (1984). ‘Tests of piezoelectric and pulsed-radio methods for quartz vein and base-metal sulfides prospecting at Giant Yellowknife Mine, N.W.T., and Sullivan Mine, Kimberley, Canada’. Geophysics49 2178-2185.
  9. Thompson, A. H., and Gist, G. A. (1991). ‘Electroseismic prospecting’. 61st Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 425-427. (??)
  10. Thompson, R. R. (1936).‘ The seismic-electric effect’. Geophysics1, 327-335.
  11. Volarovich, V. I., and Parkhomenko, E. I. (1954). ‘Piezoelectric Phenomena in Rocks’. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR99, 239-242.
  12. White, D. L. (1962). ‘Amplification of ultrasonic waves in piezoelectric semiconductors’. J. Appl. Phys. 33, 2547-2554.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG992201
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): electromagnetics; exploration; piezoelectric; seismoelectric

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error