1887
Volume 24, Issue 3-4
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

If it is assumed that sonic velocity in a sedimentary rock decreases with burial-depth according to a known velocity/depth relationship, and that velocity is not reduced by erosion from maximum burial-depth, any erosion of that rock from maximum burial-depth may be quantified using velocity data. The displacement, on the depth axis, of sonic velocity in a given unit from the normally compacted velocity/depth relationship yields apparent erosion (i.e. amount of missing section or height above maximum burial-depth).

Shales have been considered to be the only lithology to follow a sufficiently predictable velocity/depth relationship with burial-depth to be used in the estimation of erosion from sonic velocity data. However, erosion estimates based on sonic velocities in the Lower Cretaceous Allaru/Oodnadatta Mudstone of the Eromanga Basin are statistically similar to those derived from velocities in the Middle Jurassic Hutton Sandstone (an important hydrocarbon reservoir sandstone in the basin). Similarly, erosion estimates based on velocities in the Lower Triassic Bunter Sandstone (an important hydrocarbon reservoir sandstone) of the United Kingdom Southern North Sea are statistically similar to those based on velocities from the Lower Triassic Bunter Shale.

The consistency of results from the shaly and sandy units analysed suggests that overcompaction (i.e. anomalously fast sonic velocity) of the sandstones is controlled by erosion from previously greater burial-depth, rather than by burial-depth independent sedimentological and/or diagenetic processes. The results validate the use of sandstones in maximum burial-depth studies, and perhaps more importantly suggest that, even in reservoir sandstones, burial-depth is the primary control on compaction and hence porosity.

© 1993 ASEG
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG993561
1993-09-01
2026-01-22

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1071/EG993561
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baldwin, B. and Butler, C.O. (1985), ‘Compaction curves’, American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin69, 622–626.
  2. Bulat, J. and Stoker, S.J. (1987), ‘Uplift determination from interval velocity studies, United Kingdom southern North Sea’, In: Brooks, J. and Glennie, K. (Eds), Petroleum Geololgy of North West Europe, Graham and Trotman, London, 293–305.
  3. Hillis, R.R. (1991), ‘Chalk porosity and Tertiary uplift, Western Approaches Trough, SW United Kingdom and NW French continental shelves’, Journal of the Geological Society, London148, 669–679.
  4. Hillis, R.R. (1992), ‘Evidence for Pliocene erosion at Ashmore Reef (Timor Sea) from the sonic velocities of Neogene limestone formations’, Explor. Geophys.23, 489–495.
  5. Hillis, R.R., Thomson, K. and Underhill, J.R. (in press), ‘Quantification of Tertiary erosion in the Inner Moray Firth by sonic velocity data from the Chalk and the Kimmeridge Clay’, Marine and Petroleum Geology.
  6. Issler, D.R. (1992), ‘A new approach to shale compaction and stratigraphic restoration, Beaufort-Mackenzie Basin and Mackenzie Corridor, Northern Canada’, American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin76, 1170–1189.
  7. Jankowsky, W. (1962), ‘Diagenesis and oil accumulation as aids in the analysis of the structural history of the north-western German Basin’, Zeitschrift der Deutscher Geologischer Gesellschaft114, 452–460.
  8. Japsen, P. (1993), ‘Influence of lithology and Neogene uplift on seismic velocities in Denmark: implications for depth conversion of maps’, American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin77, 194–211.
  9. Lang, W.H. (1978), ‘The determination of prior depth of burial (uplift and erosion) using interval transit time’, Society of Professional Well Log Analysts Nineteenth Annual Logging Symposium, June 13-16, 1978, Paper B.
  10. Magara, K. (1976), Thickness of removed sedimentary rocks, paleopore pressure and paleotemperature, southwestern part of Western Canada Basin, American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin60, 554–565.
  11. Marie, J.P.P. (1975), ‘Rotliegendes stratigraphy and diagenesis’. In: Woodland, A.W. (Ed.), Petroleum and the Continental Shelf of North-west Europe, Volume 1, Geology. Applied Science Publishers, London, 205–211.
  12. McDonald, D.A. and Surdan, R.C. (Eds) (1984), Clastic Diagenesis. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 37.
  13. Richardsen, G., Vorren, T.O. and Tørudbakken, B.O. (1993), ‘Post-Early Cretaceous uplift and erosion in the southern Barents Sea: a discussion on analysis of seismic interval velocities’, Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift73, 3–20.
  14. Rodgers, J., Wehr, F.L. and Hunt, J.W. (1991), ‘Tertiary uplift estimation from velocity data in the Eromanga Basin’, Explor. Geophys.22, 321–324.
  15. Skagen, J.l. (1992),’Methodology applied to uplift and erosion’, Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift72, 307–311.
  16. Taylor, J.C.M. (1978), ‘Introduction to the State of the Art Meeting 1977 on Sandstone Diagenesis’, Journal of the Geological Society, London135, 3–5.
  17. Till, R. (1974), Statistical Methods for the Earth Scientist, MacMillan Press, London, 154pp.
  18. Wells, P.E. (1990), ‘Porosities and seismic velocities of mudstones from Wairarapa and oil wells of North Island, New Zealand, and their use in determining burial history’, New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics33, 29–39.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG993561
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): erosion magnitude.; maximum burial-depth; sandstone; shale; sonic velocity

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error