1887
Volume 24, Issue 3-4
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Recent work using radio wave frequencies to define ore shape between boreholes shows promise for changing the way mine geologists evaluate a deposit.

Traditionally, orebody evaluation at an advanced exploration site or a mine involves three distinct tiers of information, exploration drilling (>200 m borehole separation), follow-up drilling (40 m to 100 m separation), and in-fill drilling (<20 m). the inexact nature of ore definition at the follow-up and in-fill stages inevitably results in poor mine design or dilution. this has been shown to have a significant cost to any operation. the clear incentive is to improve evaluation techniques by using high resolution sensing methods between physical intersections.

A new geophysical technique using comparative radio wave attentuation values from cross-borehole measurements and advanced tomographic imaging procedures has been applied at a number of mine sites in Australia. Radio wave attentuation is a function of the host medium conductivity. Conductive ore will attenuate the signal more than resistive host rock. These variations in signal attenuation may be expressed in the form of a tomographic image for analysis.

This paper evaluates results from controlled experimentation at the Broken Hill and Osborne deposits and reviews the likely future role for radio imaging at metalliferous mine sites.

It is suggested that the clear role for radio scanning is particularly in the follow-up stage of drilling (40 m to 100 m). The integration of the images into mine planning packages, as an input to geostatistics and as a visualisation aid for mine planners and geologists is likely to improve the accuracy of ore definition and overall metal recovery at individual mine sites.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG993805
1993-09-01
2026-01-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Lowy, H., and Leimbeck, G. (1910). Patent 55330, Austria, April 1910.
  2. McCracken, K. (1993). ‘Geophysics for orebody delineation: the facts and the feasible’ 34th AMlRA Annual Meeting, Kalgoorlie, W.A., Sept. 1993.
  3. Rogers, P.G., Edwards, S.A., Young, J.A., and Downey, M. (1987). ‘Geotomography for the delineation of coal seam structure’, Geoexploration24, 301–328.
  4. Scott, A., Gurgenci, H., and Slifirski, M. (1992). ‘Report on the review of underground metalliferous mining and equipment research priorities’ C.M.T.E. Brisbane, Qld.
  5. Stolarczyk, L.G. (1986). ‘Continuous wave medium frequency signal transmission survey procedure for imaging structure in coal seams’, US Patent No. 4, 577, 153.
  6. Thomson, S., Hatherly, P., and Liu, G. (1990). ‘The RIM I in-mine method — Theoretical and applied studies of its mine exploration capabilities’, The Coal Journal29, 33–40.
  7. Thomson, S., Young, J., and Sheard, N. (1992). ‘Base metal applications of the radio imaging method. Current status and case studies’. Explor. Geophys.23, 373–380.
  8. Vozoff, K., Smith, G., Hatherly, P., and Thomson, S. (1993). ‘An overview of the Radio Imaging Method in Australian coal mining’, First Break Vol. 10, No. 1, Jan 1993/13.
  9. Williams, PK. (1993). ‘What is the Prize?’, 34th AMlRA Annual Meeting, Kalgoorlie, W.A., Sept. 1993.
  10. Young, J., Thomson, S. and Neil, M. (1992). ‘Geological interpretation of radio wave tomography’, Proc. 26th Newcastle Symposium, April 1992, 191–198.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG993805
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): mine geology; orebody delineation; Radio Imaging Method; RIM

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error