1887
Volume 24, Issue 3-4
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Ground penetrating radar (GPR), of all the commonly practiced geophysical techniques, has the greatest ability to provide clear high resolution images of shallow sub-surface structure. To date, however, the perceived unpredictability of its performance at different sites has limited its use.

Factors which control the performance of GPR can be summarised by the radar range equation. The site dependence of GPR is a result of the wide variation between the wave attenuation rates of different geological materials and the variation in the reflectivities of the different targets. The attenuation rate of a material depends on its conductivity and dielectric constant while the reflectivity depends on the contrast of these properties between the target and host materials. Unfortunately, since conductivity varies with frequency, conductivities obtained by resistivity and other low frequency electromagnetic geophysical measurements are different to those at GPR frequencies.

One way to obtain these properties is to make measurements of the radio-frequency electrical properties of rock samples from prospective GPR sites. For this purpose the open-ended coaxial line technique has been found to be the most practical method. Above 100 MHz measurements can be made on small samples with a single flat surface. Below 100 MHz the accuracy of this technique deteriorates and the capacitance bridge technique, which requires small disk-shaped samples, is more suitable.

In homogeneous media, nomograms can be used to convert the attenuation rates determined from the sample measurements, to a maximum depth that can be imaged by a GPR system. The maximum depth in layered media can be determined by a simple graphical method involving summing the attenuation and spreading in each layer. Case histories from 4 different sites show that despite the uncertainties involved in making any measurement on samples which have been removed from their in-situ conditions, ranges calculated in this way provide a valuable guide as to how well GPR will perform at a particular site.

© 1993 ASEG
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG993819
1993-09-01
2026-01-21

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1071/EG993819
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I.A. (Eds), (1965), Handbook of mathematical functions, Dover Publications, 616–618.
  2. Annan, A.P. and Davis, J.L. (1977), ‘Radar range analysis for geological materials’, Report of activities, Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 77-1B, 117–124.
  3. Baker, P.L. (1991), ‘Response of ground-penetrating radar to bounding surfaces and lithofacies variations in sand barrier sequences’, Explor. Geophys. 22, 19–22.
  4. Burdette, E.C., Cain, F.L. and Seals J. (1980), ’In Vivo probe measurement technique for determining dielectric properties at VHF through microwave frequencies’, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques28, 414–427.
  5. Chew, W.C., Olp, K.J. and Otto, G.P. (1991), ‘Design and calibration of a large broadband dielectric measurement cell’, IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing29, 42–47.
  6. Collett, L.S. and Katsube, T.J. (1973), ‘Electrical parameters of rocks in developing geophysical techniques’, Geophysics38, 76–91.
  7. Cook, J.C. (1970), ‘RF electrical properties of bituminous coal samples’, Geophysics35, 1079–1085.
  8. Davis, J.L. and Annan, A.P. (1989), ‘Ground-penetrating-radar for high resolution mapping of soil and rock stratigraphy’, Geophysical Prospecting37, 531–551.
  9. Deschamps, G.A. (1962), ‘Impedance of an antenna in a conducting medium’, IEEE Transactions on antennas and propagation10, 648–650.
  10. Freeman, M.S., Nottenburg, R.N. and Dubow, J.B. (1979), ‘An automated frequency domain technique for dielectric spectroscopy of materials’, Journal of Physics E: Scientific Instruments12, 899–903.
  11. Ghodgaonkar, D.K. Varadan, V.V. and Varadan, V.K. (1989), ‘A free-space method for measurement of dielectric constants and loss tangents at microwave frequencies’, IEEE Transactions on instrumentation and measurement37, 789–793.
  12. Han, K., Butler, C.M., Shen, L., He, H.Y. and Harris, M.A. (1991). ‘High frequency, complex dielectric permittivity of saline solution at elevated temperatures’, IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing29, 48–56.
  13. Hänninen, P. and Auto, S. (Eds), (1992), ‘Proceedings of the fourth international conference on ground penetrating radar’, Geological Survey of Finland, Special Paper 16.
  14. Hewlett Packard (1990a), HP 85070A Dielectric Probe Kit Product Note.
  15. Hewlett Packard, (1990b), HP 85070A Dielectric Probe Kit Manual.
  16. Kraus, J.D. (1988), Antennas, McGraw-Hill, 558.
  17. Marcuvitz, N. (1951), Waveguide Handbook, McGraw-Hill, 213–216.
  18. Maze, G., Bonnefoy, J.L. and Kamarei, M. (1990), ‘Microwave measurement of the dielectric constant using a sliding short-circuited waveguide method’, Microwave Journal23, 77–88.
  19. Nelson, S.O., Stetson, L.E. and Schlaphoff, C.W. (1974), ‘A general computer program for precise calculation of dielectric properties from short circuited waveguide measurements’, IEEE Transactions on instrumentation and measurement19, 455–460.
  20. Nicolson, A.M. and Ross, G.F. (1970), ‘Measurement of the intrinsic properties of materials by time domain techniques’, IEEE Transactions on instrumentation and measurement19, 377–382.
  21. Palaith, D.E. and Chang, S. (1983), ‘Improved accuracy for dielectric data’, Journal of Physics E: Scientific Instruments16, 227.
  22. Pham, A. (1991), ‘Material permittivity using a monopole antenna’, Telecom Australia Research Laboratories Report No. 8078.
  23. Rau, R.N. and Wharton, R.P (1982), ‘Measurement of core electrical parameters at ultrahigh and microwave frequencies’, Journal of Petroleum Technology34, 2689–2700. Paper SPE 9380.
  24. Siggins, A.F. (1990), ‘Ground penetrating radar in geotechnical applications’, Explor. Geophys. 21, 175–186.
  25. Skolnik, M.l. (1990), Radar Handbook, McGraw-Hill Publ. Co., 1.6–1.10.
  26. Smith, G.S. (1984), ‘Directive properties of antennas for transmission into a material half space’, IEEE Trans, on antennas and propagation32, 323–246.
  27. Stratton, J.A. (1941), Electromagnetic Theory, McGraw-Hill Book Co., 276.
  28. Stuchly, M.A., Brady, M.M., Stuchly, S.S. and Gadja, G. (1982), ‘Equivalent Circuit of an open ended coaxial line in a lossy dielectric’, IEEE Transactions on instrumentation and measurement31, 116–119.
  29. Stuchly, M.A. and Stuchly, S.S. (1980), ‘Coaxial line reflection methods for measuring dielectric properties of biological substances at radio and microwave frequencies — A review’, IEEE Transactions on instrumentation and measurement29, 176–183.
  30. Stuchly, S.S., Rzepecka, M.A. and Iskander, M.F. (1974), ‘Permittivity measurements at microwave frequencies using lumped elements’, IEEE Transactions on instrumentation and measurement23, 56–62.
  31. Turner, G. (1992), ‘Pulse distortion due to reflection in subsurface radar surveying’, Proceedings of the 54th EAEG Conference, June 1992, Paris, France.
  32. von Hippel, A.R. (1954), Dielectrics and waves, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 73–82.
  33. Westphal, W.B. (1954), ‘Distributed circuits’, in von Hippel, A.R. (Ed.), Dielectric materials and applications: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 63–121.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG993819
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): dielectric probe; ground penetrating radar; radar range.; RF sample testing; void detection

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error