1887
Volume 24, Issue 3-4
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Extrapolating recorded elastic displacement data from the surface downwards is the first step of a two-step elastic migration scheme. The second step is the image formation condition. Although an elastic (vector) reverse time migration can extrapolate elastic displacement data downwards, the subsurface reflections and the loss of energy due to the use of the two-way wave equations are unavoidable. The elastic Kirchhoff-Helmholtz type integrals can not be used to extrapolate elastic displacement data downwards in media in which the velocity changes in both the x-direction and the z-direction. The present method attempts to first obtain the P-and S-wave displacement potentials near the surface. Then the P- and S-wave displacement potentials are each extrapolated (in a scalar fashion) with the split-step Fourier method, subject to modest velocity gradients. Finally, the elastic displacement fields within the subsurface can be obtained from the extrapolated potential fields.

In order to obtain the P- and S-wave displacement potentials near the surface, the finite difference elastic reverse time migration method is used to extrapolate the recorded elastic surface displacement data downwards only a few depth intervals, assuming a constant velocity over this small depth region, so that the P- and S-displacement potentials can be computed from the calculated elastic displacement fields. Therefore the method can be used to extrapolate recorded elastic displacement fields from the surface downwards with almost no velocity limitation except near the surface (only a few depth intervals). It was tested on the numerical model data produced by a fourth order finite difference elastic forward modelling program with good results. The finite difference elastic reverse time migration method was used because a finite difference elastic forward modelling program had already been developed and could be run inverse. In addition, the use of the Kirchhoff-Helmholtz type integrals is preferable for the initial extrapolation of elastic surface displacement data downwards a few depth intervals to calculate potentials because of its high accuracy, no velocity limitation in the z-direction and no spurious boundary reflections. However such a scheme is computationally demanding and was not used in the present study.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG993873
1993-09-01
2026-01-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aki, K. and Richards, P.G. (1980), Quantitative Seismology. W.H. Freeman and Co.
  2. Baysal, E., Kosloff, D.D. and Sherwood, J.W.C. (1983), ‘Reverse time migration’, Geophysics 48, 1514–1524.
  3. Chang, W.F. and McMechan, G.A. (1987), ‘Elastic reverse-time migration’, Geophysics 52, 1365–1375.
  4. Dai, T.F. and Kuo, J.T. (1986), ‘Real data results of Kirchhoff elastic wave migration’, Geophysics 51, 1006–1011.
  5. Kuo, J.T. and Dai, T.F. (1984), ‘Kirchhoff elastic wave migration for the case of noncoincident source and receiver’. Geophysics 49, 1223–1238.
  6. Stoffa, P.L., Fokkema, J.T., Freire, R.M.D. and Kessinger, W.P. (1990), ‘Split-step Fourier migration’. Geophysics 55, 410–421.
  7. Stolt, R.H. (1978), ‘Migration by Fourier transform’, Geophysics 43, 23–48.
  8. Sun, R. and McMechan, G.A. (1986), ‘Pre-stack reverse-time migration for elastic waves with application to synthetic offset vertical seismic profiles’, Proc., Inst. Electr. and electron. Eng., 74, 457–465.
  9. Wapenaar, C.P.A. and Haime, G.C. (1990), ‘Elastic exploration of primary seismic P- and S-waves’. Geophysical Prospecting 38, 23–60.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG993873
Loading

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error