1887
Volume 25, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

We report here two new applications of the Poisson relation useful when a joint magnetic and gravity gradient survey has been made. In the first, an apparent susceptibility contrast to density contrast ratio map (which we call the “pseudo-lithology” map) can be estimated. In the second, selected values of the above ratio are used in a “pseudo-magnetic” filter to subtract from the magnetic field measurements the effect of a particular rock type. This would be especially useful as a filter of “geological noise” due perhaps to weathered magnetite products, particularly if the latter had an effect over a large area.

As a test of these techniques we have applied them to a simulated joint airborne survey over a model which we designate “Mini-Elura”, in which the magnetic magnitude and vertical gravity gradient anomalies are not visible above the noise due to surficiai variations.

The computed pseudo-lithology map clearly distinguishes the regions of the map dominated by the alluvium source from those due to the “Mini-Elura” orebody, while the pseudo-magnetic filter does very effectively remove the “noise” due to the alluvium from the magnetic map.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG994025
1994-03-01
2026-01-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adams, R.L. and Schmidt, B.L., (1980), ‘Geology of the Elura Zn-Pb-Ag Deposit’, in ‘The Geophysics of the Elura Orebody Cobar, New South Wales’, Emerson, DW. ed., The Australian Society of Exploration Geophysics, Sydney, 1–4.
  2. Baranov, V., (1957), ‘A New Method for Interpretation of Aeromagnetic Maps: Pseudo-gravimetric Anomalies’, Geophysics, 22,359–383.
  3. Blackburn, G., (1980), ‘Gravity and magnetic surveys – Elura orebody’, in ‘The Geophysics of the Elura Orebody Cobar, New South Wales’, Emerson, D.W. ed., The Australian Society of Exploration Geophysics, Sydney, 17–24.
  4. Choudhury, M.H., (1989), ‘Electromagnetism’, Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester, U.K.
  5. Dransfield, M.H., Buckingham, M.J., Edwards, C., van Kann, F.J., Mann, A.G., Matthews, R. and Turner, P.J., (1991), ‘Gravity Gradiometry for Geophysical Prospecting’, Explor. Geophys., 22, 107–110.
  6. Emerson, D.W., (1980), ‘The Elura Compendium’, in ‘The Geophysics of the Elura Orebody Cobar, New South Wales’, Emerson, D.W. ed., The Australian Society of Exploration Geophysics, Sydney, v-vi.
  7. Eötvös, Roland von, (1896), ‘Untersuchungen über Gravitation und Erdmagnetismus’, Ann. Physik und Chem. n. f. Leipzig, Band 59, 354–400.
  8. Fox, C., (1987), ‘An Inverse Fourier Transform Algorithm for Generating Random Signals of a Specified Spectral Form’, Computers and Geosciences, 13, 369–374.
  9. Gidley, PR. and Stuart, D.C., (1980), ‘Magnetic property studies and magnetic surveys of the Elura prospect, Cobar, N.S.W.’, in ‘The Geophysics of the Elura Orebody Cobar, New South Wales’, Emerson, D.W. ed., The Australian Society of Exploration Geophysics, Sydney, 25–30.
  10. Grant, F.S. and West, G.F., (1965), ‘Interpretation Theory in Applied Geophysics’ McGraw-Hill Book Company, Toronto.
  11. Gunn, P.J., (1975), ‘Detection of Bodies with Specified Density-Magnetization Ratios by the Use of Multichannel Wiener Filters’, Geophysics, 40, 617–620.
  12. Jekeli, C., (1988), ‘The Gravity Gradlometer Survey System (GGSS)’, Eos, 69, 105 & 116–117.
  13. Kanasewich, E.R. and Agarwal, R.G., (1970), ‘Analysis of Combined Gravity and Magnetic Fields in Wave Number Domain’, J. Geophys. Res., 75, 5702–5712.
  14. Pick, M., Pmcha, J. and Vyskocil, V., (1973), ‘Theory of the Earth’s Gravity Field’, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG994025
Loading

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error