1887
Volume 26, Issue 2-3
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Dip moveout (DMO) processing is frequently used to enhance stacked seismic sections. All DMO methods strictly require that the input data have been normal-moveout (NMO) corrected using the true medium velocity rather than the stacking (or RMS) velocity function. Unfortunately this is rarely the case in that most data which are input to DMO have been NMO-corrected according to the stacking velocity, in order to maximise semblance on a CMP gather. Such data are incompatible with the basic DMO assumption. Under such circumstances only a partial DMO process, which produces a parabolic impulse response, should be used rather than a full DMO algorithm, such as that of Hale, which entails an elliptical impulse response. The partial DMO operator accounts for the inaccuracy of the velocity information used in the NMO correction, and leads to superior results.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG995493
1995-06-01
2026-01-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bale, R. and Jakubowicz, H. 1987, Post-stack prestack migration: 57th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 714-717.
  2. Black, J.L., Schleicher, K.L. and Zhang, L, 1993, True-amplitude imaging the dip moveout: Geophysics 58, 47-66.
  3. Biondi, B. and Ronen, J. 1987, Dip moveout in shot profiles: Geophysics 52, 1473-1482.
  4. Bolondi, G., Loinger, E. and Rocca, F., 1982, Offset continuation of seismic sections: Geophysical Prospecting 30, 813-828.
  5. Deregowski, S.M., 1985, An integral implementation of dip-moveout: 47th Ann. Mtg. Europ. Assn. Explor. Geophys., Budapest.
  6. Hale, D., 1984, Dip moveout by Fourier transform: Geophysics 49, 741-757.
  7. Hale, D., 1991, Dip moveout processing: Course Notes Series, Vol 4, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa.
  8. Judson, D.R., Schultz, P.S. and Sherwood, J.W.C., 1978, Equalizing the stacking velocities of dipping events via DEVILISH: 48th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., San Francisco.
  9. Levin, F.K. 1971, Apparent velocity from dipping interface reflections.:Geophysics 36, 510-516.
  10. Li, J. 1992, Finite-difference migration to zero offset: 62nd Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Exp. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 962-965.
  11. Liner, C.L., 1991, Born theory of wave-equation dip-moveout: Geophysics 56, 182-189.
  12. Notfors, CD. and Godfrey, R.J., 1987, Dip moveout in the frequency-wavenumber domain?: Geophysics 52, 1718-1721.
  13. Salvador, L. and Savelli, S., 1982, Offset continuation for seismic stacking: Geophysical Prospecting 30, 829-8849.
  14. Yilmaz, O. and Claerbout, J.L., 1980, Prestack partial migration: Geophysics 45, 1753-1779.
  15. Zhou, B., Mason, I.M. and Greenhalgh, S.A., 1995, Accurate and efficient shot-gather dip moveout processing in the log-stretch domain. Geophysical Prospecting 43 (in press).
/content/journals/10.1071/EG995493
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Dip moveout; parabolic impulse response; stacking velocity

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error