1887
Volume 27, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

This paper discusses aeromagnetic gradiometry techniques for fixed-wing survey aircraft and presents results. Some design criteria for airborne gradiometers are briefly noted and specifications for gradiometer surveys are discussed.

The following horizontal gradiometry applications are outlined and are illustrated with examples:

-Levelling of total field surveys without the use of tie lines.

-The use of measured lateral gradient in the total field grid-ding process to achieve higher resolution of anomalies or alternatively, to enable increased line spacing without loss of resolution.

The identification of 2-D linear structures and their strike angles, on the basis of a single flight line and from these identifications, the formation of accurate estimates of vertical gradient leading in turn to accurate depth estimates using Werner deconvolution.This technique can be useful in the redesign or reorientation of a survey with very little flown data.

-The use of directly measured longitudinal gradient to estimate diurnal variations of the total field during the time interval in which a survey line is flown. The first three of these horizontal gradiometry applications are shown to be effective, while the use of directly measured longitudinal gradient to track diurnals has not been successful and the reasons are illustrated.

For vertical gradiometry, differences between directly measured vertical gradient and vertical gradient calculated from gridded total field, are discussed with examples. Based on data available, it is concluded that directly measured vertical gradient does not provide better resolution and may, in fact, introduce artefacts.

I conclude that a lateral gradiometer offers advantages that are complementary to a total field survey, while a vertical gradiometer, which is more difficult to implement, does not.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG996001
1996-03-01
2026-01-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Akima, H., 1970, A new method of interpolation and curve fitting based on local procedures: J. Ass. Comput. Mach., 17(4), 589-602.
  2. Hansen, R.O., 1985, Two approaches to total field reconstruction from gradiometer data: SEG fifth annual international meeting, Abstracts, 50 (2), 296.
  3. Hardwick, CD., 1984, Important designconsiderations for inboard magnetic gradiometers: Geophysics, 49, 2004-2018
  4. Hardwick, CD. and Onno.T., 1992,Tests of three new magnetometers: Helium, cesium and potassium: NRC Institute for Aerospace Research, LTR-FR-117, 22 pages.
  5. Keating, RB., and Pilkington, M.,1990, An automated method for the interpretation of magnetic vertical-gradient anomalies: Geophysics, 55, 336-343
  6. Marcotte, D.L., Hardwick, CD., Lemieux, J., O'Connell, M., and Reford, M., 1990, Aeromagnetic gradiometry methods: A study using real data: SEG Sixth annual international meeting, expanded abstracts, 60, 585-586.
  7. Marcotte, D.L., Hardwick, CD., and Nelson, J.B., 1992, Automated interpretation of magnetic vertical gradient anomalies: Geophysics, 57, 288-295.
  8. Nabighian, M.N., 1984, Toward a three dimensional automatic interpretation of potential field data via generalised Hilbert transforms: Fundamental relations: Geophysics, 49, 780-786.
  9. Nelson, J.B., 1994 Levelling total-field aeromagnetic data with measured horizontal gradients: Geophysics, 59, 1166-1170.
  10. Reid, A.B., 1980, Aeromagnetic survey design: Geophysics, 45, 973-976.
  11. Slack, H.A., Lynch, V,M., and Langen, L., 1967, The geomagnetic gradiometer: Geophysics, 32-5, 877-892.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG996001
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): aeromagnetic gradiometry; compensation; configurations; horizontal; lateral; levelling; vertical

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error