1887
Volume 28, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

3-D acoustic wave propagation in a 2-D model is simulated in the frequency-wavenumber domain. Fourier transforms are used to reduce the problem of solving the 3-D equation to the solution of multiple 2-D boundary-value problems. Each of these 2-D boundary-value problems is associated with a frequency-wavenumber pair, and its discretisation via a finite-difference approximation leads to a sparse system of linear algebraic equations. The sparse linear system is repeatedly solved by an LU decomposition method for different pairs of wavenumber and frequency. The 3-D response for a specific frequency is obtained by an inverse Fourier transformation of these solutions with respect to the wavenumber. Time-domain synthetic seismograms are obtained by a further temporal inverse Fourier transformation of the frequency response.

A 2.5-D absorbing boundary condition is derived from the paraxial approximation of the 3-D wave equation. It is more efficient than the 2-D boundary condition in suppressing the artificial reflections from the edges of the computational domain. The numerical singularity is avoided by allowing the frequency to become complex. The Fourier transform with respect to the wavenumber can be accelerated by a non-uniform sampling in the wavenumber domain.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG997011
1997-03-01
2026-01-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bleistein, N., 1986, Two-and-one-half dimensional in-plane wave propagation: Geophysical Prospecting 34, 686-703.
  2. Cao, S. and Greenhalgh, S., 1992, Finite-difference simulation of P-SV-wave propagation: a displacement-potential approach: Geophysical Journal International 109, 525-535.
  3. Cerjan, C, Kosloff, D., Kosloff, R. and Reshef, M., 1985, A nonreflecting boundary condition for discrete acoustic and elastic wave equation: Geophysics 50, 705-708.
  4. Cerveny, V., Molotkov, LA. and Psencik, L, 1977, Ray method in seismology: Charles University Press, Prague.
  5. Chapman, C.H., 1978, A new method for computing synthetic seismograms: Geophysical Journal of the Royal astronomical Society 64, 321-372.
  6. Chapman, C.H. and Drummond, R., 1982, Body-wave seismograms in inhomogeneous media using Maslov asymptotic theory: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 72, 5277-5317.
  7. Clayton, R. and Engquist, B., 1977, Absorbing boundary conditions for acoustic and elastic wave equations: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 67, 1529-1540.
  8. Drake, L.A., 1972, Rayleigh waves at a continental boundary by the finite element method: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 62, 1259-1268.
  9. Fuchs, K. and Muller, G., 1971, Computation of synthetic seismograms with the reflectivity method and comparison with observations: Geophysical Journal of the Royal astronomical Society 23, 417-433.
  10. Furumura, T. and Takenaka. H., 1996, 2.5-D modelling of elastic waves using the pseudospectral method: Geophysical Journal International 124, 820-832.
  11. Helmberger, D.V., 1968, The crust-mantle transition in the Bering Sea: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 58, 179-214.
  12. Higdon, R.L., 1991, Absorbing boundary conditions for elastic waves: Geophysics 56, 231-241.
  13. Mora, P., 1990, Modeling anisotropic seismic waves in 3-D: Society of Exploration Geophysicists 59th Annual International Meeting Expanded Abstracts, 1039-1043.
  14. Reynolds, A.C., 1978, Boundary conditions for the numerical solution of wave propagation problems: Geophysics 43, 1099-1110.
  15. Song, Z.-M. and Williamson, PR., 1995, Frequency-domain acoustic-wave modeling and inversion of crosshole data: Part I - 2.5-D modeling method: Geophysics 60, 784-795.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG997011
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): acoustic wave; domain; finite difference; frequency-wavenumber; numerical modelling

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error