1887
Volume 28, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Historical arguments about the ‘sensitivity’ of an electrode array to different volume elements in the subsurface have been satisfied by the concept of signal contribution sections, although they address only homogeneous Earths. Similar arguments on the ‘depth of investigation’ of various electrode arrays have been put to rest by the concept of . The effective depth is a well-defined characteristic of the vertical response function of an electrode array obtained by integrating horizontal planes of the corresponding signal contribution section. Debate on the ‘resolution’ of various electrode arrays has not reached a firm conclusion. The ranking of arrays in order of resolving power varies according to the definition of resolution. A new resolution index is proposed here. It builds on the successful effective depth concept by introducing new concepts called and . The index is quantified by formulating the cumulative vertical response function of a general electrode array. The dipole-dipole arrays are found to have the best vertical resolution, and the Schlumberger array is found to be better than the conventional Wenner array.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG997106
1997-03-01
2026-01-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Acworth, R.I. and Griffiths, D.H., 1985, Simple data processing of tripotential apparent resistivity measurements as an aid to the interpretation of subsurface structure: Geophysical Prospecting 33, 861-887.
  2. Banerjee, B. and Pal, B.P., 1986, Asimple method for determination of depth of investigation in resistivity prospecting: Exploration Geophysics 17, 93-95.
  3. Barker, R.D., 1979, Signal contribution sections and their use in resistivity studies: Geophysical Journal of the Royal astronomical Society 59, 123-129.
  4. Barker, R.D., 1981, The offset system of electrical resistivity sounding and its use with a multicore cable: Geophysical Prospecting 29, 128-143.
  5. Barker, R.D., 1989, Depth of investigation of collinear symmetrical four-electrode arrays: Geophysics 54, 1031-1037.
  6. Edwards, L.S., 1977, A modified pseudosection for resistivity and IP: Geophysics 42, 1020-1036.
  7. Evjen, H. M., 1938, Depth factors and resolving power of electrical measurements: Geophysics 3, 78-95.
  8. Merrick, N. P., 1996, The electrical resistivity method. In:. Zannetti P ed., Environmental modeling Vol.3: Computer methods and software for simulating environmental pollution and its adverse effects, Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, 329-370.
  9. Parasnis, D.S., 1986, Principles of applied geophysics: Fourth edition. Chapman and Hall, New York, 402pp.
  10. Roy, A. and Apparao, A., 1971, Depth of investigation in direct current methods: Geophysics 36, 943-959.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG997106
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): effective depth; resistivity; resolution

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error