1887
Volume 28, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

The patterns of source and receiver locations, i.e., the acquisition geometry, used in a seismic survey affect the resulting data in a variety of ways. Herein is a study of the relationships between the acquisition geometry and the resulting subsurface illumination patterns by comparing basic land and Ocean Bottom Cable geometries with modern marine geometries. From the imaging point of view, there are certain advantages to some of the land-type acquisition geometries. By examining a new set of acquisition attributes based on imaging properties, such differences in image quality can be predicted and perhaps corrected in the survey design stage.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG997192
1997-03-01
2026-01-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Beasley, C. and Klolz, R., 1992, Equalization of DMO for irregular spatial sampling. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 62nd Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 970-973.
  2. Beasley, C, 1993, Quality assurance of spatial sampling for DMO. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 63rd Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 544-547.
  3. George, D. 1994, Seismic acquisition. Offshore 54, no. 10, 24.
  4. Vermeer, G., 1994, 3-D symmetric sampling. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 64th Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 906-909.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG997192
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): acquisition; imaging; quality assurance; survey design

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error