1887
Volume 28, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Principal directions for an azimuthally anisotropic medium are the directions along which the quasi P and quasi S waves propagate as pure P and S modes. For azimuthal anisotropy, induced by a single set of oriented vertical fractures, two of these principal directions are the directions parallel to and perpendicular to the fractures.

To investigate if conventional P-wave data could be used in fracture detection, we computed synthetic data for an isotropic Taylor shale over a fractured Austin chalk model. We found that the modelled P-wave reflection amplitude variation with offset has different slopes along different directions. We also found that the reflection amplitude at fixed offsets is periodic in , where is the orientation angle of the shooting direction with respect to one of the principal directions. For fracture induced anisotropy, this principal direction corresponds to the direction parallel to or perpendicular to the fractures. We use this periodic azimuthal dependence to obtain fracture orientation and a qualitative measure of the fracture density from the azimuthal P-wave data.

We applied our technique to real P-wave data, collected over a wide source-to-receiver azimuth. Computations using our method gave an orientation of the principal direction consistent with the general fracture orientation in the area as inferred from other geological and geophysical evidence.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG997379
1997-09-01
2026-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alford, R.M., 1986, Shear data in the presence of azimuthal anisotropy, Dilley, Texas: 56th Ann. Internat. Mtg. Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 476-479.
  2. Allen, J.L., and Peddy, C.P., 1993, Amplitude variation with offset: Gulf coast case studies: Soc. Expl. Geophys.
  3. Chang, C.H., and Gardner, G.H.F., 1993, Effects of vertically aligned fractures on reflection amplitudes, an amplitude-versus-offset study: 63rd Ann. Internat. Mtg. Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 769-771.
  4. Lefeuvre, F, 1994, Fracture related anisotropy detection and analysis: "and if the P waves were enough": 64th Ann. Internat. Mtg. Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 942-945.
  5. Mallick, S., and Frazer, L.N., 1990, Computation of synthetic seismograms for stratified azimuthally anisotropic media: J. Geophys. Res 95, 8513-8526.
  6. Mallick, S., and Frazer, L.N., 1991, Reflection/transmission coefficients and azimuthal anisotropy in marine seismic studies: Geophys. J. Int. 105, 241-252.
  7. Neidell, N.S., and Cook, E.E., 1986, Seismic method for identifying low velocity subsurface zones: US Patent No 4,571,710; Feb. 18, 1986.
  8. RUeger, A., and Tsvankin, I., 1995, Azimuthal variation of AVO response for fractured reservoirs, 65th Ann. Internat. Mtg. Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 1103-1106.
  9. Thomsen, L., 1988, Reflection seismology over azimuthally anisotropic media: Geophysics 53, 304-313.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG997379
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): AVOAnisotropy; azimuthal anisotropy; fractures

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error