1887
Volume 29, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

AEM data collected over quasi-layered regolith structures is readily and conveniently interpreted using stitched 1D models. As a check on the validity of this process, a 3D modelling program was used to generate a ‘blocky’ regolith conductivity profile to characterise the gross conductivity structure seen on a stitched 1D model of a 12-km AEM survey line. The differences between model data based on ‘stitched 1D conductivities’ and the original field data highlight ‘interpretation errors’ resulting from a simplistic 1D assumption. In the case tested, large conductive zones (1 km or so in lateral scale) directly interpreted from a stitched 1D conductivity section underestimated the required local conductivity and overestimated the true lateral dimensions. Interspersed resistive areas are thus spatially more extensive than they appear on the stitched 1D model.

Simple 3D modelling does not however automatically correct for survey deficiencies. For example, probable errors in bird location resulted in surficial conductors being modelled at a ‘false’ depth of 10 to 20 m using the nominal but imprecisely known AEM system geometry. Topography should also be modelled to account for all observed features, but this was not possible with the 3D-modelling program used.

© 1998 ASEG
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG998191
1998-03-01
2026-01-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1071/EG998191
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Green, A., Roberts, G., Duncan, A., Pik, P, Sattel, D., Golding, C., and Lane, R., 1998, The Saltmap AEM system: paper presented at AEM ’98 conference, Sydney, 23–25 Feb, Expanded Abstracts, 1P5.
  2. King, A., 1998, Inversion of localised electromagnetic anomalies: Ph.D. thesis, Macquarie University.
  3. Macnae, J. and Lamontagne, Y., 1987, Imaging quasi-layered conductive structures by simple processing of transient electromagnetic data: Geophysics 52. 545–554.
  4. Macnae, J.C., Smith, R., Polzer, B.D., Lamontagne, Y., and Klinkert, P.S., 1991, Conductivity-depth imaging of airborne electromagnetic step-response data: Geophysics 56, 102–114.
  5. Palacky, G.J., 1988, Resistivity characteristics of geologic targets, in Nabighian, M.N., (ed.), Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics 1, Theory, 52–129, Soc. Explor. Geophys.
  6. Sattel, D., 1996, Resolving shallow conductivity structures: Ph.D. thesis, Macquarie University.
  7. Sattel, D., 1998, Conductivity information in three dimensions. Exploration Geophysics 29 (this issue)
  8. Stolz, E.M., Raiche, A., Sugeng, F., and Macnae, J.C., 1985, Is full 3D inversion necessary for interpreting EM data? Exploration Geophysics 26, 167–171.
  9. Stolz, E.M., and Macnae, J.C., 1998, Evaluating EM waveforms by singular-value decomposition of exponential basis functions: Geophysics 63, 64–74.
  10. Sykes, M., and Das, U., 1998, Removal of herringbone effects from AEM data using the Radon transform: Exploration Geophysics 29 (this issue).
  11. Wolfgram, P. and Karlik, G, 1995, Conductivity-depth transform of Geotem data: Exploration Geophysics 26, 179–185.
  12. Xiong, Z., and Tripp, A.C., 1995, Electromagnetic scattering of large structures in layered earth using integral equations, Radio Science 30, 921–929
  13. Xiong, Z., 1992, Electromagnetic modelling of three-dimensional structures by the method of system iteration using integral equations, Geophysics 57, 1556–1561.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG998191
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error