1887
Volume 29, Issue 3-4
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Two methods of reducing noise in aerial survey data have been evaluated as to their performance on a set of spectra measured with a laboratory spectrometer and a section of an aerial survey. The two methods were Noise Adjusted Singular Value Decomposition (NASVD) and Maximum Noise Fraction (MNF). These are applied to the spectral data before subsequent processing to determine potassium, uranium and thorium concentrations. The MNF method was found most effective at removing noise from U and Th signals, reducing noise in U by a factor of 3.5 and Th by 1.5. No technique investigated gave an effective noise reduction for K. The MNF technique requires that a measure of the noise be obtained and this is best done using the differences of adjoining spectra along flight lines. Parameters such as the number of spectral channels to use in the analysis and the number of MNF components to retain in reconstructing the smoothed spectra were investigated. We recommend keeping around 40 MNF components to ensure minor spatially related signal is retained and using spectral data in the range 200 to 3000 keV.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG998324
1998-09-01
2026-01-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Briggs, I.C., 1974. Machine contouring using minimum curvature. Geophysics, 39, 39–48.
  2. Bristow, Q., 1983, Airborne gamma-ray spectrometry in uranium exploration. Principles and current practice: Internat. J. Appl. Radiation Isotopes, 34,199–229.
  3. Darnley, A.G., 1977, The advantages of standardizing radiometric exploration measurements, and how to do it: Can. Inst. Mining Bull., Feb, 91–95.
  4. Grasty, R.L., Glynn, J.E. and Grant, J.A., 1985, The analysis of multichannel airborne gamma-ray spectra: Geophysics, 50, 2611–2620.
  5. Grasty, R.L., 1982, Utilizing experimentally derived multi-channel gamma-ray spectra for the analysis of airborne data: in Proc. Uranium Exploration Methods. Review of NEA; IAEA R&D Programme, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, 653–668.
  6. Green, A.A., Berman, M., Switzer, P. and Craig, M.D., 1988, A transformation for ordering multispectral data in terms of image quality with implications for noise removal: IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, 26, 65–74.
  7. Hovgaard, J. and Grasty, R.L., 1997, Reducing statistical noise in airborne gamma-ray data through spectral component analysis: in Gubins, A.G., ed., Proceed. Exploration 97: Fourth Decennial Internat. Conf. Mineral Exploration, 753–764.
  8. IAEA, 1991, Airborne gamma-ray spectrometer surveying: Internat. Atomic Energy Agency, Technical Report Series, No 323.
  9. Mathis, G.L., 1987, Smoothing spectral gamma logs: a simple but effective technique: Geophysics, 52, 363–367.
  10. Minty, B.R.S., 1992, Airborne gamma-ray spectrometr]ic background estimation using full spectrum analysis: Geophysics, 57, 279–287.
  11. Minty, B.R.S., Luyendyk, A.P.J. and Brodie, R.C., 1997, Calibration and data processing for airborne gamma-ray spectrometry: AGSO J. Aust. Geol. Geophys., 17,51–62.
  12. Nielson, A.A., 1994, Analysis of regularly and irregularly sampled spatial, multivariate, and multi-temporal data: PhD thesis, Tech. Univ. of Denmark.
  13. Olsen, Si, 1993, Estimation of noise in images: An evaluation: Graphical Models and Image Processing, 55, 319–323.
  14. Tammenmaa, J., Grasty, R.L. and Peltoniemi, M., 1976, The reduction of statistical noise in airborne radiometric data: Can. J. Earth Sci., 13,1351–1357.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG998324
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Gamma-ray Aerial Noise Reduction Statistics

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error