1887
Volume 29, Issue 3-4
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Hydrocarbon production may cause changes in dynamic reservoir properties including pressure and fluid saturation. Understanding the magnitude of such variations is essential for the exploration of new reserves and optimising the performance of existing fields. Laboratory measurements of acoustic properties of representative rock samples, simulating in situ pressure and fluid saturation, provide a useful guide for calibrating and interpreting seismic and sonic log data. A petro-acoustic study was carried out to investigate factors influencing acoustic properties of Cooper Basin sandstones. This study integrated field data and petrography with laboratory measurements of acoustic properties of representative rock samples. In a previous paper we highlighted experimental data; here we elaborate on implications of these results in predicting rock property and pore fluid type from sonic logs and seismic reservoir monitoring. Analysis of data from acoustic measurements at ultrasonic frequencies on samples from the Cooper Basin reveals that the pressure dependency of the Cooper Basin rocks is very large. The velocity-pressure relationship obtained from laboratory data is consistent with the sonic log anomaly observed in partially pressure-depleted reservoirs in the Cooper Basin. Neglecting the pressure effect on velocity results in the overestimation of rock porosity by the sonic log in overpressured formations, and underestimation of porosity in pressure depleted zones. A method is proposed to correct the sonic log reading for pressure variation in the study area. At in-situ reservoir pressure and V are strongly correlated and dry and water-saturated samples show significantly different velocity ratios (V/V). The V/V ratio is not affected by porosity and clay content and therefore has potential as a gas indicator in the region. The strong stress sensitivity and the distinct V/V. values for dry and water saturated Cooper Basin cores suggest that the dynamic changes in pressure and saturation of the reservoir rocks may also be detectable from acoustic impedance or travel time at seismic and sonic log frequencies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG998456
1998-09-01
2026-01-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Castagna, J.P., Batzle, M.L. and Eastwood, R.L., 1985, Relationships between compressional-wave and shear-wave velocities in clastic silicate rocks: Geophysics, 50, 571-581.
  2. Dutta, N.C., 1997, A new procedure to generate Pseudo-shear wave log construction-methods, results and road a head: EAGE 59th Conference, Extended Abstracts, paper F25.
  3. Freund, D., 1992, Ultrasonic compressional and shear velocities in dry clastic rocks as a function of porosity, clay content, and confining pressure: Geophys. I. Internat., 108, 125-135.
  4. Han, D-H., Nur, A. and Morgan, D" 1986, Effects of porosity and clay content on wave velocities in sandstones: Geophysics, 51, 2093-2107.
  5. Jizba, D. and Marion, D., 1994, Heimdal Monitoring I: Establishing feasibility from cores and logs: SEG Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, paper DP4.4.
  6. Khaksar, A. and Griffiths, C.M., 1996, Influence of effective stress on acoustic velocity and log derived porosity: SPE 36981.
  7. Khaksar, A. and Griffiths, C.M., 1998, Acoustic velocities as function of effective pressure in low to moderate porosity shaly sandstones, part 1-Experimental Results: Exploration Geophysics (this volume).
  8. Khaksar, A., McCann, C., Griffiths, C., Sothcott, J. and Khazanehdari, J., 1997, Stress sensitivity of P-and S-wave velocities in a set of low to medium porosity dry sandstones: EAGE 59th Conference, Extended Abstracts, paper F31.
  9. Tatham, R.H., 1982, Vp/Vs and lithology: Geophysics, 47, 336-344.
  10. Vernik, L., 1997. Predicting porosity from acoustic velocities in siliciclastics: a new look: Geophysics, 62, 118-128.
  11. Vernik, L., 1994, Predicting lithology and transport properties from acoustic velocities based on petrophysical classification of siliciclastics: Geophysics 59, 420-427.
  12. Waite, M.W. and Sigit, R., 1997, Seismic monitoring of the Duri steamflood, Application to reservoir management: The Leading Edge 16, 1275-1278.
  13. Wang, Z.H., 1997, Feasibility of time-lapse seismic reservoir monitoring: the physical basis: The Leading Edge, 16, 1327-1329.
  14. Watts, G.F. T., Jizba, D., Gawith, D.E. and Gutteridge, P., 1996, Reservoir monitoring of the Magnus Field through 4D time-lapse seismic analysis: Petroleum Geoscience, 2, 361-372.
  15. Wyllie, M.R., Gregory, A.R. and Gardner, G.H.F., 1958, An experimental investigation of factors affecting elastic wave velocities in porous media: Geophysics, 23, 459-493.
  16. Xu, S. and White, R.E., 1996, A physical model for shear-wave prediction: Geophys. Prosp., 43, 91-118.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG998456
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): reservoir pressure; shear wave; time lapse seismic; velocity ratio

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error